Mekiayla C Singleton, Elissa Kozlov, M Reul Friedman, Susan M Enguidanos
{"title":"Planning for the Future: Advance Care Planning Knowledge, Discussion and Decision-Making Among Older, Sexual Minority Adults.","authors":"Mekiayla C Singleton, Elissa Kozlov, M Reul Friedman, Susan M Enguidanos","doi":"10.1177/10499091241309670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Prior research has shown that advance care planning (ACP) knowledge and discussion varies among racial and ethnic groups. However, little is known if similar disparities exist within the sexual minority (SM) population. <b>Objectives:</b> To investigate racial disparities in ACP knowledge, discussion, and decision making within the SM population. <b>Methods:</b> Data from an online survey (N = 281) asked Black and White SM adults ages 50+ about their knowledge and actions about future healthcare wishes and their healthcare experiences. A series of multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to examine the association between ACP knowledge, discussion, and medical decision-making and race, while adjusting for other demographic and health-related variables. <b>Results:</b> On average, respondents were 57 years old (SD = 6.04) and just over half identified as being White (52%) and as men (55%). Most participants had heard of ACP (74%) and had an ACP discussion with someone (65%). Sixty-six percent of participants were very comfortable with medical decision-making. White SM adults had higher odds of having ACP knowledge (aOR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.78, 7.07) and discussions (aOR = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.28, 4.61). While no racial differences were found in comfort with medical decision-making, other sociodemographics were significantly associated with comfort with medical decision-making. <b>Conclusion:</b> Outcomes from this work indicate persistent racial disparities in ACP within the SM population in addition to highlighting other factors that influence ACP. These findings emphasize the need for resources to address this systemic issues and to ensure that SM adults have access to and engage in ACP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091241309670"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241309670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:先前的研究表明,不同种族和族裔群体对预先护理计划(ACP)的了解和讨论程度各不相同。然而,性少数群体(SM)中是否也存在类似的差异却鲜为人知。研究目的调查性少数人群在 ACP 知识、讨论和决策方面的种族差异。方法: 通过在线调查(N = 1,000 人)获得数据:一项在线调查(N = 281)的数据询问了 50 岁以上的黑人和白人 SM 成年人对未来医疗保健愿望的了解和行动以及他们的医疗保健经验。在对其他人口统计学和健康相关变量进行调整的同时,进行了一系列多变量逻辑回归,以检验 ACP 知识、讨论和医疗决策与种族之间的关联。结果:受访者平均年龄为 57 岁(SD = 6.04),半数以上为白人(52%)和男性(55%)。大多数参与者听说过 ACP(74%),并与他人讨论过 ACP(65%)。66%的参与者对医疗决策非常满意。白种 SM 成年人拥有 ACP 知识(aOR = 3.56;95% CI = 1.78,7.07)和讨论(aOR = 2.43;95% CI = 1.28,4.61)的几率更高。虽然在医疗决策舒适度方面未发现种族差异,但其他社会人口统计学特征与医疗决策舒适度有显著相关性。结论:这项工作的结果表明,在 SM 人口中,除了强调影响 ACP 的其他因素外,在 ACP 方面还持续存在种族差异。这些发现强调,需要提供资源来解决这一系统性问题,并确保 SM 成年人能够获得并参与 ACP。
Planning for the Future: Advance Care Planning Knowledge, Discussion and Decision-Making Among Older, Sexual Minority Adults.
Background: Prior research has shown that advance care planning (ACP) knowledge and discussion varies among racial and ethnic groups. However, little is known if similar disparities exist within the sexual minority (SM) population. Objectives: To investigate racial disparities in ACP knowledge, discussion, and decision making within the SM population. Methods: Data from an online survey (N = 281) asked Black and White SM adults ages 50+ about their knowledge and actions about future healthcare wishes and their healthcare experiences. A series of multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to examine the association between ACP knowledge, discussion, and medical decision-making and race, while adjusting for other demographic and health-related variables. Results: On average, respondents were 57 years old (SD = 6.04) and just over half identified as being White (52%) and as men (55%). Most participants had heard of ACP (74%) and had an ACP discussion with someone (65%). Sixty-six percent of participants were very comfortable with medical decision-making. White SM adults had higher odds of having ACP knowledge (aOR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.78, 7.07) and discussions (aOR = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.28, 4.61). While no racial differences were found in comfort with medical decision-making, other sociodemographics were significantly associated with comfort with medical decision-making. Conclusion: Outcomes from this work indicate persistent racial disparities in ACP within the SM population in addition to highlighting other factors that influence ACP. These findings emphasize the need for resources to address this systemic issues and to ensure that SM adults have access to and engage in ACP.