Frantisek Kozisek, Darina Dvorakova, Filip Kotal, Hana Jeligova, Lenka Mayerova, Veronika Svobodova, Martina Jurikova, Veronika Gomersall, Jana Pulkrabova
{"title":"Assessing PFAS in Drinking Water: Insights from the Czech Republic's Risk-Based Monitoring Approach.","authors":"Frantisek Kozisek, Darina Dvorakova, Filip Kotal, Hana Jeligova, Lenka Mayerova, Veronika Svobodova, Martina Jurikova, Veronika Gomersall, Jana Pulkrabova","doi":"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the drinking water supplies in the Czech Republic using a risk-based monitoring approach. Tap water samples (n=27) from sources close to areas potentially contaminated with PFAS were analysed. A total of 28 PFAS were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry after solid phase extraction. Total PFAS concentrations (∑PFAS) varied from undetectable to 90.8 ng/L, with perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) being the most abundant, detected in over 70% of samples. Risk-based monitoring in drinking water showed that commercial wells had higher PFAS levels compared to tap water, particularly C4-C9 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), possibly due to proximity to industrial areas. However, the hypothesis that risk-based monitoring is more effective than random monitoring was not confirmed, possibly because specific sources did not produce the target PFAS or because of the wide range and less obvious sources of potential contamination. The study also assessed exposure risks and compliance with regulatory thresholds. Weekly intake estimates for adults and children indicated that regular consumption of most contaminated water sample would exceed the tolerable weekly intake. Compared to EU regulations, none of the tap water samples exceeded the 'Sum of PFAS' parametric value of 100 ng/L, though one sample approached this limit. In addition, surface water samples from the Jizera River (n=21) showed a wider range of PFAS, with C7-C10 PFCAs, PFBS, and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in every sample, with higher PFOS concentrations at a median of 2.56 ng/L. ∑PFAS concentrations increased downstream, rising from 1.08 ng/L near the spring to 26 ng/L downstream. This comprehensive analysis highlights the need for detailed/areal monitoring to also address hidden or non-obvious sources of PFAS contamination.</p>","PeriodicalId":93933,"journal":{"name":"Chemosphere","volume":" ","pages":"143969"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用基于风险的监测方法,调查捷克共和国饮用水供应中是否存在全氟烷基物质(PFAS)。研究分析了来自可能受到 PFAS 污染地区附近水源的自来水样本(n=27)。经过固相萃取后,采用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定了 28 种 PFAS。PFAS 总浓度(∑PFAS)从检测不到到 90.8 纳克/升不等,其中以全氟戊酸 (PFPeA)、全氟己酸 (PFHxA)、全氟庚酸 (PFHpA) 和全氟丁烷磺酸 (PFBS) 的含量最高,在 70% 以上的样本中都能检测到。基于风险的饮用水监测结果表明,与自来水相比,商业水井的 PFAS 含量较高,尤其是 C4-C9 全氟羧酸(PFCAs),这可能是由于靠近工业区的缘故。不过,基于风险的监测比随机监测更有效的假设并未得到证实,这可能是因为特定来源并未产生目标 PFAS,也可能是因为潜在污染源范围广且不太明显。该研究还评估了暴露风险和对监管阈值的遵守情况。成人和儿童的每周摄入量估计值表明,经常饮用大多数受污染的水样会超过每周可容忍摄入量。与欧盟法规相比,没有一个自来水样本超过 100 纳克/升的 "全氟辛烷磺酸总和 "参数值,但有一个样本接近该限值。此外,吉泽拉河的地表水样本(n=21)显示出更广泛的 PFAS 范围,每个样本中都含有 C7-C10 PFCAs、PFBS 和全氟辛烷磺酸 (PFOS),其中 PFOS 浓度较高,中位数为 2.56 纳克/升。∑全氟辛烷磺酸的浓度在下游有所增加,从泉水附近的 1.08 纳克/升上升到下游的 26 纳克/升。这项综合分析突出表明,需要进行详细/全面的监测,以解决隐藏或不明显的全氟辛烷磺酸污染源问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing PFAS in Drinking Water: Insights from the Czech Republic's Risk-Based Monitoring Approach.

This study investigates the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the drinking water supplies in the Czech Republic using a risk-based monitoring approach. Tap water samples (n=27) from sources close to areas potentially contaminated with PFAS were analysed. A total of 28 PFAS were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry after solid phase extraction. Total PFAS concentrations (∑PFAS) varied from undetectable to 90.8 ng/L, with perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) being the most abundant, detected in over 70% of samples. Risk-based monitoring in drinking water showed that commercial wells had higher PFAS levels compared to tap water, particularly C4-C9 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), possibly due to proximity to industrial areas. However, the hypothesis that risk-based monitoring is more effective than random monitoring was not confirmed, possibly because specific sources did not produce the target PFAS or because of the wide range and less obvious sources of potential contamination. The study also assessed exposure risks and compliance with regulatory thresholds. Weekly intake estimates for adults and children indicated that regular consumption of most contaminated water sample would exceed the tolerable weekly intake. Compared to EU regulations, none of the tap water samples exceeded the 'Sum of PFAS' parametric value of 100 ng/L, though one sample approached this limit. In addition, surface water samples from the Jizera River (n=21) showed a wider range of PFAS, with C7-C10 PFCAs, PFBS, and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in every sample, with higher PFOS concentrations at a median of 2.56 ng/L. ∑PFAS concentrations increased downstream, rising from 1.08 ng/L near the spring to 26 ng/L downstream. This comprehensive analysis highlights the need for detailed/areal monitoring to also address hidden or non-obvious sources of PFAS contamination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信