全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)暴露与乳腺癌和女性生殖器癌的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi, Elizabeth Maria Kappil, Sirui Zhang, Tongzhang Zheng, Paolo Boffetta
{"title":"全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)暴露与乳腺癌和女性生殖器癌的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi, Elizabeth Maria Kappil, Sirui Zhang, Tongzhang Zheng, Paolo Boffetta","doi":"10.23749/mdl.v115i6.16330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PFASs, synthetic chemicals, can be encountered by humans through occupational or environmental exposure, and some reports suggest that they can disrupt endocrine and hormonal activities. In this comprehensive review and meta-analysis, we explored the connection between exposure to PFASs and the risks of breast and female genital cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature from IARC Monographs, ATSDR documents, and PubMed (as of January 2024) for cohort, case-control, and ecological studies on PFAS exposure and breast or female genital cancers. Four reviewers independently screened studies, and data extraction included study design, patient characteristics, and effect size measures. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Forest plots of relative risks (RR) were constructed for breast and female genital cancer. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models, stratified analyses, dose-response assessments, and publication bias evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 24 studies, comprising 10 cohort, 13 case-control, and one ecological study. The summary relative risk (RR) of breast cancer for PFOA exposure was 1.08 (95% CI = 0.97-1.20; n=21), and for PFOS was 1.00 (95% CI = 0.85-1.18; n=12). The RR for ovarian cancer and PFAS was 1.07 (95% CI = 1.04-1.09; n=12). The stratification by quality score, year of publication, and exposure source did not reveal any differences. However, analysis by geographical region (p=0.01) and study design (p=0.03) did show differences, particularly in terms of incidence. Stratified analyses of the dose-response relationship did not reveal a trend in the risk of breast cancer or female genital cancers, and no publication bias was found for either cancer type. No results were available for cervical and endometrial cancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, we have found an association between PFAS exposure and ovarian cancer and a possible effect on breast cancer incidence in some specific groups. Although potential bias and confounding prevent conclusions regarding causality, these findings may hold significance for females who encounter such pollutants in their occupational or daily environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49833,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Del Lavoro","volume":"115 6","pages":"e2024043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Per- And Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Exposure and Risk of Breast, and Female Genital Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi, Elizabeth Maria Kappil, Sirui Zhang, Tongzhang Zheng, Paolo Boffetta\",\"doi\":\"10.23749/mdl.v115i6.16330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PFASs, synthetic chemicals, can be encountered by humans through occupational or environmental exposure, and some reports suggest that they can disrupt endocrine and hormonal activities. In this comprehensive review and meta-analysis, we explored the connection between exposure to PFASs and the risks of breast and female genital cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed the literature from IARC Monographs, ATSDR documents, and PubMed (as of January 2024) for cohort, case-control, and ecological studies on PFAS exposure and breast or female genital cancers. Four reviewers independently screened studies, and data extraction included study design, patient characteristics, and effect size measures. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Forest plots of relative risks (RR) were constructed for breast and female genital cancer. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models, stratified analyses, dose-response assessments, and publication bias evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 24 studies, comprising 10 cohort, 13 case-control, and one ecological study. The summary relative risk (RR) of breast cancer for PFOA exposure was 1.08 (95% CI = 0.97-1.20; n=21), and for PFOS was 1.00 (95% CI = 0.85-1.18; n=12). The RR for ovarian cancer and PFAS was 1.07 (95% CI = 1.04-1.09; n=12). The stratification by quality score, year of publication, and exposure source did not reveal any differences. However, analysis by geographical region (p=0.01) and study design (p=0.03) did show differences, particularly in terms of incidence. Stratified analyses of the dose-response relationship did not reveal a trend in the risk of breast cancer or female genital cancers, and no publication bias was found for either cancer type. No results were available for cervical and endometrial cancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, we have found an association between PFAS exposure and ovarian cancer and a possible effect on breast cancer incidence in some specific groups. Although potential bias and confounding prevent conclusions regarding causality, these findings may hold significance for females who encounter such pollutants in their occupational or daily environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Del Lavoro\",\"volume\":\"115 6\",\"pages\":\"e2024043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Del Lavoro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v115i6.16330\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Del Lavoro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v115i6.16330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全氟辛烷磺酸是一种合成化学物质,人类可以通过职业或环境接触接触到它们,一些报告表明它们可以扰乱内分泌和激素活动。在这项综合综述和荟萃分析中,我们探讨了PFASs暴露与乳腺癌和女性生殖器癌风险之间的联系。方法:我们系统地回顾了IARC专著、ATSDR文件和PubMed(截至2024年1月)的文献,包括PFAS暴露与乳腺癌或女性生殖器癌的队列、病例对照和生态学研究。四名审稿人独立筛选研究,数据提取包括研究设计、患者特征和效应量测量。研究质量采用改良版纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估。构建了乳腺癌和女性生殖器癌的相对危险度森林图(RR)。meta分析采用随机效应模型、分层分析、剂量反应评估和发表偏倚评估。结果:meta分析纳入24项研究,包括10项队列研究、13项病例对照研究和1项生态研究。PFOA暴露导致乳腺癌的总相对危险度(RR)为1.08 (95% CI = 0.97-1.20;n=21),全氟辛烷磺酸为1.00 (95% CI = 0.85-1.18;n = 12)。卵巢癌和PFAS的RR为1.07 (95% CI = 1.04-1.09;n = 12)。质量评分、出版年份和暴露源的分层没有发现任何差异。然而,按地理区域(p=0.01)和研究设计(p=0.03)进行的分析确实显示出差异,特别是在发病率方面。剂量-反应关系的分层分析没有揭示乳腺癌或女性生殖器癌风险的趋势,也没有发现两种癌症类型的发表偏倚。子宫癌和子宫内膜癌没有结果。结论:总之,我们已经发现PFAS暴露与卵巢癌之间存在关联,并可能对某些特定人群的乳腺癌发病率产生影响。虽然潜在的偏见和混淆妨碍了对因果关系的结论,但这些发现可能对在职业或日常环境中遇到此类污染物的女性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Per- And Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Exposure and Risk of Breast, and Female Genital Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: PFASs, synthetic chemicals, can be encountered by humans through occupational or environmental exposure, and some reports suggest that they can disrupt endocrine and hormonal activities. In this comprehensive review and meta-analysis, we explored the connection between exposure to PFASs and the risks of breast and female genital cancers.

Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature from IARC Monographs, ATSDR documents, and PubMed (as of January 2024) for cohort, case-control, and ecological studies on PFAS exposure and breast or female genital cancers. Four reviewers independently screened studies, and data extraction included study design, patient characteristics, and effect size measures. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Forest plots of relative risks (RR) were constructed for breast and female genital cancer. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models, stratified analyses, dose-response assessments, and publication bias evaluation.

Results: The meta-analysis included 24 studies, comprising 10 cohort, 13 case-control, and one ecological study. The summary relative risk (RR) of breast cancer for PFOA exposure was 1.08 (95% CI = 0.97-1.20; n=21), and for PFOS was 1.00 (95% CI = 0.85-1.18; n=12). The RR for ovarian cancer and PFAS was 1.07 (95% CI = 1.04-1.09; n=12). The stratification by quality score, year of publication, and exposure source did not reveal any differences. However, analysis by geographical region (p=0.01) and study design (p=0.03) did show differences, particularly in terms of incidence. Stratified analyses of the dose-response relationship did not reveal a trend in the risk of breast cancer or female genital cancers, and no publication bias was found for either cancer type. No results were available for cervical and endometrial cancers.

Conclusion: In summary, we have found an association between PFAS exposure and ovarian cancer and a possible effect on breast cancer incidence in some specific groups. Although potential bias and confounding prevent conclusions regarding causality, these findings may hold significance for females who encounter such pollutants in their occupational or daily environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Del Lavoro
Medicina Del Lavoro 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Medicina del Lavoro is a bimonthly magazine founded in 1901 by L. Devoto, and then directed by L. Prieti, E. Vigliani, V. Foà, P.A. Bertazzi (Milan). Now directed by A. Mutti (Parma), the magazine is the official Journal of the Italian Society of Occupational Medicine (SIML), aimed at training and updating all professionals involved in prevention and cure of occupational diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信