Lumeng Shen, Mingfang Han, Jingjing Lou, Wenya Shen, Shibo Li
{"title":"抗病毒药物能否解决发热伴血小板减少综合征的治疗挑战?-系统的荟萃分析。","authors":"Lumeng Shen, Mingfang Han, Jingjing Lou, Wenya Shen, Shibo Li","doi":"10.3855/jidc.19032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging infectious disease with high mortality and severity rates. However, there is no clear treatment plan, specific effective antiviral drugs, or effective vaccine for SFTS. Recent studies have shown that the therapeutic effect of Ribavirin and other commonly used antiviral drugs such as Favipiravir (T-705), on SFTS is still controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of antiviral drugs on SFTS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were searched from Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase. and PubMed from inception to June 30, 2022, and updated to 2023. The study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by re-searchers independently. A counterpart assessment tool was used to assess methodological quality, and the Stata15 software was employed to perform meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 8 studies consisting of 4692 patients. The results showed no significant difference in the mortality rate of SFTS patients between the antiviral drug group and the control group (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.46-1.59, p = 0.618). Antiviral drugs had no noticeable effect on this disease (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.58-1.48, p = 0.747).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At present, antiviral drugs (Ribavirin and Favipiravir) used routinely in clinics show no positive effect on the treatment of SFTS yet and fail to reduce the mortality rate. On the other hand, clinical studies specifically evaluating viral load found that antiviral drugs were effective in the treatment of SFTS patients with low viral load, but the efficacy was not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"18 11","pages":"1645-1652"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can antiviral drugs address the treatment challenges of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome? - a systematic meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lumeng Shen, Mingfang Han, Jingjing Lou, Wenya Shen, Shibo Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3855/jidc.19032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging infectious disease with high mortality and severity rates. However, there is no clear treatment plan, specific effective antiviral drugs, or effective vaccine for SFTS. Recent studies have shown that the therapeutic effect of Ribavirin and other commonly used antiviral drugs such as Favipiravir (T-705), on SFTS is still controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of antiviral drugs on SFTS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were searched from Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase. and PubMed from inception to June 30, 2022, and updated to 2023. The study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by re-searchers independently. A counterpart assessment tool was used to assess methodological quality, and the Stata15 software was employed to perform meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 8 studies consisting of 4692 patients. The results showed no significant difference in the mortality rate of SFTS patients between the antiviral drug group and the control group (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.46-1.59, p = 0.618). Antiviral drugs had no noticeable effect on this disease (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.58-1.48, p = 0.747).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At present, antiviral drugs (Ribavirin and Favipiravir) used routinely in clinics show no positive effect on the treatment of SFTS yet and fail to reduce the mortality rate. On the other hand, clinical studies specifically evaluating viral load found that antiviral drugs were effective in the treatment of SFTS patients with low viral load, but the efficacy was not statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"volume\":\"18 11\",\"pages\":\"1645-1652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.19032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.19032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:发热伴血小板减少综合征(SFTS)是一种死亡率和严重程度都很高的新兴传染病。然而,目前尚无明确的治疗方案、特异有效的抗病毒药物或有效的疫苗。最近的研究表明,利巴韦林和其他常用的抗病毒药物如Favipiravir (T-705)对SFTS的治疗效果仍然存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评价抗病毒药物对SFTS的治疗效果。方法:检索Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Embase等相关文献。PubMed从成立到2022年6月30日,并更新到2023年。研究筛选、数据提取和质量评估均由研究人员独立进行。采用对应评估工具评估方法学质量,采用Stata15软件进行meta分析。结果:meta分析纳入8项研究,共4692例患者。结果显示,抗病毒药物组与对照组的SFTS患者死亡率差异无统计学意义(HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.46 ~ 1.59, p = 0.618)。抗病毒药物对该病无明显影响(RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.58 ~ 1.48, p = 0.747)。结论:目前临床常规使用的抗病毒药物(利巴韦林、法匹拉韦)对SFTS的治疗效果尚不明显,且未能降低死亡率。另一方面,专门评估病毒载量的临床研究发现,抗病毒药物对低病毒载量的SFTS患者治疗有效,但疗效无统计学意义。
Can antiviral drugs address the treatment challenges of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome? - a systematic meta-analysis.
Background: Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging infectious disease with high mortality and severity rates. However, there is no clear treatment plan, specific effective antiviral drugs, or effective vaccine for SFTS. Recent studies have shown that the therapeutic effect of Ribavirin and other commonly used antiviral drugs such as Favipiravir (T-705), on SFTS is still controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of antiviral drugs on SFTS.
Methods: Relevant studies were searched from Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase. and PubMed from inception to June 30, 2022, and updated to 2023. The study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by re-searchers independently. A counterpart assessment tool was used to assess methodological quality, and the Stata15 software was employed to perform meta-analysis.
Results: The meta-analysis included 8 studies consisting of 4692 patients. The results showed no significant difference in the mortality rate of SFTS patients between the antiviral drug group and the control group (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.46-1.59, p = 0.618). Antiviral drugs had no noticeable effect on this disease (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.58-1.48, p = 0.747).
Conclusions: At present, antiviral drugs (Ribavirin and Favipiravir) used routinely in clinics show no positive effect on the treatment of SFTS yet and fail to reduce the mortality rate. On the other hand, clinical studies specifically evaluating viral load found that antiviral drugs were effective in the treatment of SFTS patients with low viral load, but the efficacy was not statistically significant.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries.
JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.