阿司匹林和利伐沙班双重抗血栓治疗对继发性心血管结局的影响。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Wei Li, Yi Li, Chen Liu, Jinghao Yuan, Weize Fan, Qing Miao, Xinshun Gu
{"title":"阿司匹林和利伐沙班双重抗血栓治疗对继发性心血管结局的影响。","authors":"Wei Li, Yi Li, Chen Liu, Jinghao Yuan, Weize Fan, Qing Miao, Xinshun Gu","doi":"10.12659/MSM.945457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Dual antiplatelet therapy is the main treatment for cardiovascular diseases (CADs). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of aspirin combined with low-dose rivaroxaban in the secondary prevention of high-risk ischemic cardiovascular diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 168 patients who were diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction or multiple vessel disease 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention were divided into 2 groups: the aspirin group (aspirin as acetylsalicylic acid: 100 mg once daily) and the aspirin + rivaroxaban group (aspirin: 100 mg once daily, rivaroxaban: 2.5 mg twice daily). The patients were followed up for 2 years to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a new dual-channel antithrombotic treatment strategy. RESULTS The occurrence of MACE (recurrent myocardial infarction, in-stent restenosis, coronary target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, heart failure, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality) in the rivaroxaban + aspirin group was lower than that in the aspirin group (3.57% of patients received aspirin + rivaroxaban treatment vs 13.10% of patients received aspirin treatment). There were not more adverse events in the rivaroxaban + aspirin group than in the aspirin group. Compared with patients administered aspirin, the coagulation function of patients taking aspirin + rivaroxaban was significantly changed. No heart failure occurred in either group of patients with CADs. CONCLUSIONS Aspirin + rivaroxaban had better primary outcome and secondary outcomes in patients with a high risk of ischemia. Our results provide a basis for evaluating the efficacy and safety of drugs used in secondary prevention among patients with high risk of ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e945457"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Aspirin and Rivaroxaban on Secondary Cardiovascular Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Li, Yi Li, Chen Liu, Jinghao Yuan, Weize Fan, Qing Miao, Xinshun Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.945457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Dual antiplatelet therapy is the main treatment for cardiovascular diseases (CADs). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of aspirin combined with low-dose rivaroxaban in the secondary prevention of high-risk ischemic cardiovascular diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 168 patients who were diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction or multiple vessel disease 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention were divided into 2 groups: the aspirin group (aspirin as acetylsalicylic acid: 100 mg once daily) and the aspirin + rivaroxaban group (aspirin: 100 mg once daily, rivaroxaban: 2.5 mg twice daily). The patients were followed up for 2 years to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a new dual-channel antithrombotic treatment strategy. RESULTS The occurrence of MACE (recurrent myocardial infarction, in-stent restenosis, coronary target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, heart failure, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality) in the rivaroxaban + aspirin group was lower than that in the aspirin group (3.57% of patients received aspirin + rivaroxaban treatment vs 13.10% of patients received aspirin treatment). There were not more adverse events in the rivaroxaban + aspirin group than in the aspirin group. Compared with patients administered aspirin, the coagulation function of patients taking aspirin + rivaroxaban was significantly changed. No heart failure occurred in either group of patients with CADs. CONCLUSIONS Aspirin + rivaroxaban had better primary outcome and secondary outcomes in patients with a high risk of ischemia. Our results provide a basis for evaluating the efficacy and safety of drugs used in secondary prevention among patients with high risk of ischemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e945457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景双重抗血小板治疗是心血管疾病(CADs)的主要治疗方法。在本研究中,我们评价阿司匹林联合低剂量利伐沙班二级预防高危缺血性心血管疾病的有效性和安全性。材料与方法将经皮冠状动脉介入治疗1年后诊断为急性心肌梗死或多血管疾病的168例患者分为阿司匹林组(阿司匹林为乙酰水杨酸:100mg每日1次)和阿司匹林+利伐沙班组(阿司匹林:100mg每日1次,利伐沙班:2.5 mg每日2次)。对患者进行了2年的随访,以评估新的双通道抗血栓治疗策略的临床疗效和安全性。结果利伐沙班+阿司匹林组MACE(复发性心肌梗死、支架内再狭窄、冠状动脉靶血管重建术、支架内血栓形成、心力衰竭、再住院、全因死亡率)的发生率低于阿司匹林组(阿司匹林+利伐沙班组为3.57%,阿司匹林组为13.10%)。利伐沙班+阿司匹林组的不良事件发生率不高于阿司匹林组。与服用阿司匹林的患者相比,服用阿司匹林+利伐沙班的患者凝血功能明显改变。两组cad患者均未发生心力衰竭。结论阿司匹林+利伐沙班对缺血高危患者有更好的主要结局和次要结局。本研究结果为评价缺血高危患者二级预防用药的有效性和安全性提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Aspirin and Rivaroxaban on Secondary Cardiovascular Outcomes.

BACKGROUND Dual antiplatelet therapy is the main treatment for cardiovascular diseases (CADs). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of aspirin combined with low-dose rivaroxaban in the secondary prevention of high-risk ischemic cardiovascular diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 168 patients who were diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction or multiple vessel disease 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention were divided into 2 groups: the aspirin group (aspirin as acetylsalicylic acid: 100 mg once daily) and the aspirin + rivaroxaban group (aspirin: 100 mg once daily, rivaroxaban: 2.5 mg twice daily). The patients were followed up for 2 years to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a new dual-channel antithrombotic treatment strategy. RESULTS The occurrence of MACE (recurrent myocardial infarction, in-stent restenosis, coronary target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, heart failure, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality) in the rivaroxaban + aspirin group was lower than that in the aspirin group (3.57% of patients received aspirin + rivaroxaban treatment vs 13.10% of patients received aspirin treatment). There were not more adverse events in the rivaroxaban + aspirin group than in the aspirin group. Compared with patients administered aspirin, the coagulation function of patients taking aspirin + rivaroxaban was significantly changed. No heart failure occurred in either group of patients with CADs. CONCLUSIONS Aspirin + rivaroxaban had better primary outcome and secondary outcomes in patients with a high risk of ischemia. Our results provide a basis for evaluating the efficacy and safety of drugs used in secondary prevention among patients with high risk of ischemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信