在埃塞俄比亚工作的护士临床能力及其相关因素:一个横断面研究。

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241275213
Meseret Robi Tura, Dinaol Mulu, Ajib Kadir, Ababo Getahun, Yohanis Megersa
{"title":"在埃塞俄比亚工作的护士临床能力及其相关因素:一个横断面研究。","authors":"Meseret Robi Tura, Dinaol Mulu, Ajib Kadir, Ababo Getahun, Yohanis Megersa","doi":"10.1177/23779608241275213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical competence is a critical element in providing high-quality nursing care. A higher level of clinical competence positively influences patient health outcomes as well as nurses' job performance and satisfaction. Nonetheless, there is limited data on nurses' clinical competence in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the level of clinical competency among nurses working in selected public hospitals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from March 1 to 30, 2022. Two hundred five randomly selected nurses from three selected hospitals in the West Shoa Zone namely H1, H2, and H3 participated in the study via a structured self-administered questionnaire. The collected data were checked for completeness and then entered Epi-data v.4.2.2 and analyzed by Stata software v.14.2. Independent t-test and analysis of variance were used to identify factors associated with nurses' clinical competence. The level of statistical significance was declared at a <i>p</i>-value < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall clinical competence of participants was 2.501 (<i>SD</i> = 0.36), indicating a moderate level of clinical competence. Participants had higher competence scores on the professional development dimension and lower competence scores on the leadership dimension. The null hypothesis was rejected. Age, work experience, professional satisfaction, level of satisfaction, level of hospital, current position, shifting status, retrieval of newly published information, previous training, and frequency of training were the identified factors associated with nurses' clinical competence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nearly five in 10 participants in the study setting had inadequate clinical competence. Professional satisfaction, level of satisfaction, previous training, and frequency of training were factors related to nurses' clinical competence. It is recommended that responsible stakeholders like the Minister of Health and the Ethiopian Nursing Association should work to improve nurses' clinical competence by focusing on the identified factors. Also, health policymakers should set strategies to assess nurses' clinical competence frequently to ensure quality nursing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"10 ","pages":"23779608241275213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse's Clinical Competence and Its Associated Factors Among Working in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Meseret Robi Tura, Dinaol Mulu, Ajib Kadir, Ababo Getahun, Yohanis Megersa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23779608241275213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical competence is a critical element in providing high-quality nursing care. A higher level of clinical competence positively influences patient health outcomes as well as nurses' job performance and satisfaction. Nonetheless, there is limited data on nurses' clinical competence in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the level of clinical competency among nurses working in selected public hospitals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from March 1 to 30, 2022. Two hundred five randomly selected nurses from three selected hospitals in the West Shoa Zone namely H1, H2, and H3 participated in the study via a structured self-administered questionnaire. The collected data were checked for completeness and then entered Epi-data v.4.2.2 and analyzed by Stata software v.14.2. Independent t-test and analysis of variance were used to identify factors associated with nurses' clinical competence. The level of statistical significance was declared at a <i>p</i>-value < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall clinical competence of participants was 2.501 (<i>SD</i> = 0.36), indicating a moderate level of clinical competence. Participants had higher competence scores on the professional development dimension and lower competence scores on the leadership dimension. The null hypothesis was rejected. Age, work experience, professional satisfaction, level of satisfaction, level of hospital, current position, shifting status, retrieval of newly published information, previous training, and frequency of training were the identified factors associated with nurses' clinical competence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nearly five in 10 participants in the study setting had inadequate clinical competence. Professional satisfaction, level of satisfaction, previous training, and frequency of training were factors related to nurses' clinical competence. It is recommended that responsible stakeholders like the Minister of Health and the Ethiopian Nursing Association should work to improve nurses' clinical competence by focusing on the identified factors. Also, health policymakers should set strategies to assess nurses' clinical competence frequently to ensure quality nursing care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"23779608241275213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653466/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241275213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241275213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床能力是提供高质量护理的关键因素。较高的临床能力水平对患者健康结局、护士工作绩效和满意度均有正向影响。尽管如此,关于埃塞俄比亚护士临床能力的数据有限。目的:了解所选公立医院护士的临床胜任能力水平。方法:采用基于机构的横断面研究设计,时间为2022年3月1日至30日。从西Shoa区三家医院(H1、H2和H3)随机抽取的225名护士通过结构化的自我管理问卷参与了研究。收集的数据进行完整性检查,然后输入Epi-data v.4.2.2,用Stata软件v.14.2进行分析。采用独立t检验和方差分析确定影响护士临床能力的因素。结果:受试者临床能力总分为2.501 (SD = 0.36),临床能力水平为中等水平。被试在专业发展维度上的胜任力得分较高,在领导能力维度上的胜任力得分较低。零假设被拒绝。年龄、工作经验、专业满意度、满意度、医院级别、当前职位、转换状态、新发布信息检索、既往培训和培训频率是影响护士临床能力的因素。结论:在研究环境中,近五成的参与者临床能力不足。专业满意度、满意度、培训经历、培训频次是影响护士临床能力的主要因素。建议卫生部长和埃塞俄比亚护理协会等负责任的利益攸关方通过关注已确定的因素,努力提高护士的临床能力。此外,卫生政策制定者应制定策略,经常评估护士的临床能力,以确保护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse's Clinical Competence and Its Associated Factors Among Working in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Clinical competence is a critical element in providing high-quality nursing care. A higher level of clinical competence positively influences patient health outcomes as well as nurses' job performance and satisfaction. Nonetheless, there is limited data on nurses' clinical competence in Ethiopia.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the level of clinical competency among nurses working in selected public hospitals.

Method: Institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from March 1 to 30, 2022. Two hundred five randomly selected nurses from three selected hospitals in the West Shoa Zone namely H1, H2, and H3 participated in the study via a structured self-administered questionnaire. The collected data were checked for completeness and then entered Epi-data v.4.2.2 and analyzed by Stata software v.14.2. Independent t-test and analysis of variance were used to identify factors associated with nurses' clinical competence. The level of statistical significance was declared at a p-value < .05.

Results: The overall clinical competence of participants was 2.501 (SD = 0.36), indicating a moderate level of clinical competence. Participants had higher competence scores on the professional development dimension and lower competence scores on the leadership dimension. The null hypothesis was rejected. Age, work experience, professional satisfaction, level of satisfaction, level of hospital, current position, shifting status, retrieval of newly published information, previous training, and frequency of training were the identified factors associated with nurses' clinical competence.

Conclusion: Nearly five in 10 participants in the study setting had inadequate clinical competence. Professional satisfaction, level of satisfaction, previous training, and frequency of training were factors related to nurses' clinical competence. It is recommended that responsible stakeholders like the Minister of Health and the Ethiopian Nursing Association should work to improve nurses' clinical competence by focusing on the identified factors. Also, health policymakers should set strategies to assess nurses' clinical competence frequently to ensure quality nursing care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信