新生儿重症监护病房入院和出院清单的编制和有效性。

Q3 Nursing
Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20240132.en
Catharine Galvão Diniz, Giulia Ribeiro Schettino Regne, Daniela Cristina Zica Silva, Allana Dos Reis Corrêa, Luciana Regina Ferreira da Mata, Bruna Figueiredo Manzo
{"title":"新生儿重症监护病房入院和出院清单的编制和有效性。","authors":"Catharine Galvão Diniz, Giulia Ribeiro Schettino Regne, Daniela Cristina Zica Silva, Allana Dos Reis Corrêa, Luciana Regina Ferreira da Mata, Bruna Figueiredo Manzo","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20240132.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate the content of checklists for safe admission and discharge in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological study conducted between 2018 and 2020 in four stages: 1) literature review; 2) checklist construction; 3) content validity by 32 neonatal nursing specialists from different Brazilian states, predominantly from the southeastern region; 4) development of the final version of the instruments. Validity was performed using a Likert-type scale. Items with a Content Validity Index of 0.90 or higher were accepted. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The contents of two checklists were constructed and validated: one for admission, with 18 items, and another for discharge, with seven items. For the admission checklist, 41.03% of items were validated in the first round, 33.33%, in the second, and 23.08%, in the third. One item was excluded for not achieving the minimum Content Validity Index (>0.90). For the discharge checklist, all items achieved a CVI ≥ 0.90, with 64.7% validated in the first round and 35.3% in the second round. No items were excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The content of patient safety checklists for admission and discharge in Neonatal Intensive Care Units was considered valid.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":"45 spe1","pages":"e20240132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elaboration and validity of admission and discharge checklists in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.\",\"authors\":\"Catharine Galvão Diniz, Giulia Ribeiro Schettino Regne, Daniela Cristina Zica Silva, Allana Dos Reis Corrêa, Luciana Regina Ferreira da Mata, Bruna Figueiredo Manzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20240132.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate the content of checklists for safe admission and discharge in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological study conducted between 2018 and 2020 in four stages: 1) literature review; 2) checklist construction; 3) content validity by 32 neonatal nursing specialists from different Brazilian states, predominantly from the southeastern region; 4) development of the final version of the instruments. Validity was performed using a Likert-type scale. Items with a Content Validity Index of 0.90 or higher were accepted. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The contents of two checklists were constructed and validated: one for admission, with 18 items, and another for discharge, with seven items. For the admission checklist, 41.03% of items were validated in the first round, 33.33%, in the second, and 23.08%, in the third. One item was excluded for not achieving the minimum Content Validity Index (>0.90). For the discharge checklist, all items achieved a CVI ≥ 0.90, with 64.7% validated in the first round and 35.3% in the second round. No items were excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The content of patient safety checklists for admission and discharge in Neonatal Intensive Care Units was considered valid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"volume\":\"45 spe1\",\"pages\":\"e20240132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20240132.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20240132.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:制定和验证新生儿重症监护病房安全入院和出院检查清单的内容。方法:2018 - 2020年进行方法学研究,分四个阶段进行:1)文献综述;2)检查表构建;3)来自巴西不同州的32名新生儿护理专家的内容效度,主要来自东南部地区;4)开发仪器的最终版本。效度采用李克特量表。内容效度指数为0.90或更高的项目被接受。采用描述性统计进行数据分析。结果:构建并验证了两份检查表的内容:入院检查表共18项,出院检查表共7项。入院检查表第一轮有41.03%的项目被确认,第二轮为33.33%,第三轮为23.08%。1项因未达到最低内容效度指数(>0.90)而被排除。出院检查表中所有项目的CVI≥0.90,第一轮确认率为64.7%,第二轮确认率为35.3%。没有项目被排除在外。结论:新生儿重症监护病房住院和出院患者安全检查表的内容是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elaboration and validity of admission and discharge checklists in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Objective: To develop and validate the content of checklists for safe admission and discharge in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Methods: A methodological study conducted between 2018 and 2020 in four stages: 1) literature review; 2) checklist construction; 3) content validity by 32 neonatal nursing specialists from different Brazilian states, predominantly from the southeastern region; 4) development of the final version of the instruments. Validity was performed using a Likert-type scale. Items with a Content Validity Index of 0.90 or higher were accepted. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.

Results: The contents of two checklists were constructed and validated: one for admission, with 18 items, and another for discharge, with seven items. For the admission checklist, 41.03% of items were validated in the first round, 33.33%, in the second, and 23.08%, in the third. One item was excluded for not achieving the minimum Content Validity Index (>0.90). For the discharge checklist, all items achieved a CVI ≥ 0.90, with 64.7% validated in the first round and 35.3% in the second round. No items were excluded.

Conclusion: The content of patient safety checklists for admission and discharge in Neonatal Intensive Care Units was considered valid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信