基于膝关节冠状面排列的膝关节生物力学研究。

Q3 Medicine
Yunxin Wang, Ping Xu, Ning Lu, Wenjin Li, Shisen Xu
{"title":"基于膝关节冠状面排列的膝关节生物力学研究。","authors":"Yunxin Wang, Ping Xu, Ning Lu, Wenjin Li, Shisen Xu","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202408048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish a finite element model of the knee joint based on coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) typing method, and analyze the biomechanical characteristics of different types of knee joints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The finite element models of the knee joint were established based on CT scan data of 6 healthy volunteers. There were 5 males and 1 female with an average age of 24.2 years (range, 23-25 years). There were 3 left knees and 3 right knees. According to the CPAK typing method, the knees were rated as types Ⅰ to Ⅵ. Under the same material properties, boundary conditions, and axial loading, biomechanical simulations were performed on the finite element model of the knee joint. Based on the Von Mises stress nephogram and displacement nephogram, the peak stresses of the meniscus, femoral cartilage, and tibial cartilage, and the displacement of the meniscus were compared among different types of knee joints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The constructed finite element model of the knee joint was verified to be effective, and the stress and displacement results were consistent with previous literature. Under the axial load of 1 000 N, the stress nephogram showed that the stress distribution of the medial and lateral meniscus and tibial cartilage of CPAK type Ⅲ knee joint was the most uneven. The peak stresses of the lateral meniscus and tibial cartilage were 9.969 6 MPa and 2.602 7 MPa, which were 173% and 165% of the medial side, respectively. The difference of peak stress between the medial and lateral femoral cartilage was the largest in type Ⅳ knee joint, and the medial was 221% of the lateral. The displacement nephogram showed that the displacement of the medial meniscus was greater than that of the lateral meniscus except for types Ⅲ and Ⅵ knee joints. The difference between medial and lateral meniscus displacement of type Ⅲ knee joint was the largest, the lateral was 170% of the medial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the same type of joint line obliquity (JLO), the medial and lateral stress distribution of the knee was more uniform in varus and neutral positions than in valgus position. At the same time, the distal vertex of JLO subgroup can help to reduce the uneven medial and lateral stress distribution of varus knee, but increase the uneven distribution of valgus knee.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"38 12","pages":"1466-1473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Biomechanical study of knee joint based on coronal plane alignment of the knee].\",\"authors\":\"Yunxin Wang, Ping Xu, Ning Lu, Wenjin Li, Shisen Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.7507/1002-1892.202408048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish a finite element model of the knee joint based on coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) typing method, and analyze the biomechanical characteristics of different types of knee joints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The finite element models of the knee joint were established based on CT scan data of 6 healthy volunteers. There were 5 males and 1 female with an average age of 24.2 years (range, 23-25 years). There were 3 left knees and 3 right knees. According to the CPAK typing method, the knees were rated as types Ⅰ to Ⅵ. Under the same material properties, boundary conditions, and axial loading, biomechanical simulations were performed on the finite element model of the knee joint. Based on the Von Mises stress nephogram and displacement nephogram, the peak stresses of the meniscus, femoral cartilage, and tibial cartilage, and the displacement of the meniscus were compared among different types of knee joints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The constructed finite element model of the knee joint was verified to be effective, and the stress and displacement results were consistent with previous literature. Under the axial load of 1 000 N, the stress nephogram showed that the stress distribution of the medial and lateral meniscus and tibial cartilage of CPAK type Ⅲ knee joint was the most uneven. The peak stresses of the lateral meniscus and tibial cartilage were 9.969 6 MPa and 2.602 7 MPa, which were 173% and 165% of the medial side, respectively. The difference of peak stress between the medial and lateral femoral cartilage was the largest in type Ⅳ knee joint, and the medial was 221% of the lateral. The displacement nephogram showed that the displacement of the medial meniscus was greater than that of the lateral meniscus except for types Ⅲ and Ⅵ knee joints. The difference between medial and lateral meniscus displacement of type Ⅲ knee joint was the largest, the lateral was 170% of the medial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the same type of joint line obliquity (JLO), the medial and lateral stress distribution of the knee was more uniform in varus and neutral positions than in valgus position. At the same time, the distal vertex of JLO subgroup can help to reduce the uneven medial and lateral stress distribution of varus knee, but increase the uneven distribution of valgus knee.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国修复重建外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"38 12\",\"pages\":\"1466-1473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655383/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国修复重建外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202408048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202408048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立基于膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分型法的膝关节有限元模型,分析不同类型膝关节的生物力学特征。方法:基于6例健康志愿者的膝关节CT扫描数据,建立膝关节有限元模型。男5例,女1例,平均年龄24.2岁,年龄范围23 ~ 25岁。有三个左膝和三个右膝。根据CPAK分型法,将膝关节分为Ⅰ~Ⅵ型。在相同的材料特性、边界条件和轴向载荷下,对膝关节有限元模型进行生物力学模拟。基于Von Mises应力云图和位移云图,比较不同类型膝关节的半月板、股骨软骨和胫骨软骨的峰值应力以及半月板的位移。结果:建立的膝关节有限元模型验证了模型的有效性,应力和位移结果与文献一致。在1 000 N的轴向载荷下,应力云图显示CPAK型Ⅲ膝关节内侧、外侧半月板和胫骨软骨的应力分布最不均匀。外侧半月板和胫骨软骨的峰值应力分别为9.969 6 MPa和2.6027 MPa,分别占内侧的173%和165%。Ⅳ型膝关节股骨软骨内侧与外侧的峰值应力差异最大,内侧为外侧的221%。位移云图显示,除Ⅲ和Ⅵ型膝关节外,内侧半月板位移大于外侧半月板位移。Ⅲ型膝关节内侧半月板移位与外侧半月板移位差异最大,外侧半月板移位为内侧半月板移位的170%。结论:同一类型关节线倾角(JLO)下,内翻位和中立位的膝关节内侧和外侧应力分布比外翻位更均匀。同时,JLO远端顶点亚组有助于减少膝内翻内侧和外侧应力分布不均匀,但增加了外翻膝关节分布不均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Biomechanical study of knee joint based on coronal plane alignment of the knee].

Objective: To establish a finite element model of the knee joint based on coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) typing method, and analyze the biomechanical characteristics of different types of knee joints.

Methods: The finite element models of the knee joint were established based on CT scan data of 6 healthy volunteers. There were 5 males and 1 female with an average age of 24.2 years (range, 23-25 years). There were 3 left knees and 3 right knees. According to the CPAK typing method, the knees were rated as types Ⅰ to Ⅵ. Under the same material properties, boundary conditions, and axial loading, biomechanical simulations were performed on the finite element model of the knee joint. Based on the Von Mises stress nephogram and displacement nephogram, the peak stresses of the meniscus, femoral cartilage, and tibial cartilage, and the displacement of the meniscus were compared among different types of knee joints.

Results: The constructed finite element model of the knee joint was verified to be effective, and the stress and displacement results were consistent with previous literature. Under the axial load of 1 000 N, the stress nephogram showed that the stress distribution of the medial and lateral meniscus and tibial cartilage of CPAK type Ⅲ knee joint was the most uneven. The peak stresses of the lateral meniscus and tibial cartilage were 9.969 6 MPa and 2.602 7 MPa, which were 173% and 165% of the medial side, respectively. The difference of peak stress between the medial and lateral femoral cartilage was the largest in type Ⅳ knee joint, and the medial was 221% of the lateral. The displacement nephogram showed that the displacement of the medial meniscus was greater than that of the lateral meniscus except for types Ⅲ and Ⅵ knee joints. The difference between medial and lateral meniscus displacement of type Ⅲ knee joint was the largest, the lateral was 170% of the medial.

Conclusion: In the same type of joint line obliquity (JLO), the medial and lateral stress distribution of the knee was more uniform in varus and neutral positions than in valgus position. At the same time, the distal vertex of JLO subgroup can help to reduce the uneven medial and lateral stress distribution of varus knee, but increase the uneven distribution of valgus knee.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信