2024关于成人睡眠障碍不同诊断方法使用的立场声明-巴西睡眠协会。

IF 1 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sleep Science Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1800887
Luciana de Oliveira Palombini, Márcia Assis, Luciano Ferreira Drager, Luciane Impelliziere Luna de Mello, Gabriel Natan Pires, Edilson Zancanella, Rogério Santos-Silva
{"title":"2024关于成人睡眠障碍不同诊断方法使用的立场声明-巴西睡眠协会。","authors":"Luciana de Oliveira Palombini, Márcia Assis, Luciano Ferreira Drager, Luciane Impelliziere Luna de Mello, Gabriel Natan Pires, Edilson Zancanella, Rogério Santos-Silva","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1800887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The current document represents the official position of Associação Brasileira do Sono (ABS; Brazilian Sleep Association) on the application of different sleep studies and provides specific recommendations for the use of different types of polysomnography (PSG) and respiratory polygraphy. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  The present document was based on existing guidelines. The steering committee discussed its findings and developed recommendations and contraindications, which were refined in discussions with the advisory committee. Adaptations were made based on professional experience, pathophysiological knowledge, and theoretical reasoning, especially to cover topics not discussed in previous guidelines or to adapt recommendations to the context and current practices in Brazil. <b>Results</b>  A total of 55 recommendations were made, covering the following domains: professional requirements for the requisition and interpretation of sleep studies ( <i>n</i>  = 7); eligibility for different sleep studies ( <i>n</i>  = 9); diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB; <i>n</i>  = 5); diagnosis of SDB in special conditions ( <i>n</i>  = 3); diagnosis of SDB in association with other sleep disorders and comorbidities ( <i>n</i>  = 3); sleep studies on the follow-up of patients with SDB ( <i>n</i>  = 9); sleep studies for positive air pressure titration ( <i>n</i>  = 3); diagnosis of other sleep disorders ( <i>n</i>  = 10); and sleep studies on other conditions ( <i>n</i>  = 6). <b>Conclusion</b>  The selection of the type of sleep study should be made carefully, considering resource constraints, clinical suspicion of moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and individual patient needs, among other factors. It is crucial that health professionals receive appropriate training and board certification in sleep science, thus being able to determine the most suitable diagnostic method, understand their indications and limitations, and assure an accurate diagnosis for each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"17 4","pages":"e476-e492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2024 Position Statement on the Use of Different Diagnostic Methods for Sleep Disorders in Adults - Brazilian Sleep Association.\",\"authors\":\"Luciana de Oliveira Palombini, Márcia Assis, Luciano Ferreira Drager, Luciane Impelliziere Luna de Mello, Gabriel Natan Pires, Edilson Zancanella, Rogério Santos-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1800887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The current document represents the official position of Associação Brasileira do Sono (ABS; Brazilian Sleep Association) on the application of different sleep studies and provides specific recommendations for the use of different types of polysomnography (PSG) and respiratory polygraphy. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  The present document was based on existing guidelines. The steering committee discussed its findings and developed recommendations and contraindications, which were refined in discussions with the advisory committee. Adaptations were made based on professional experience, pathophysiological knowledge, and theoretical reasoning, especially to cover topics not discussed in previous guidelines or to adapt recommendations to the context and current practices in Brazil. <b>Results</b>  A total of 55 recommendations were made, covering the following domains: professional requirements for the requisition and interpretation of sleep studies ( <i>n</i>  = 7); eligibility for different sleep studies ( <i>n</i>  = 9); diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB; <i>n</i>  = 5); diagnosis of SDB in special conditions ( <i>n</i>  = 3); diagnosis of SDB in association with other sleep disorders and comorbidities ( <i>n</i>  = 3); sleep studies on the follow-up of patients with SDB ( <i>n</i>  = 9); sleep studies for positive air pressure titration ( <i>n</i>  = 3); diagnosis of other sleep disorders ( <i>n</i>  = 10); and sleep studies on other conditions ( <i>n</i>  = 6). <b>Conclusion</b>  The selection of the type of sleep study should be made carefully, considering resource constraints, clinical suspicion of moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and individual patient needs, among other factors. It is crucial that health professionals receive appropriate training and board certification in sleep science, thus being able to determine the most suitable diagnostic method, understand their indications and limitations, and assure an accurate diagnosis for each patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep Science\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"e476-e492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651843/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文件代表巴西国家统计局(ABS)的官方立场。巴西睡眠协会)对不同睡眠研究的应用进行了研究,并为不同类型的多导睡眠图(PSG)和呼吸多导睡眠图的使用提供了具体建议。材料和方法本文件是在现有指南的基础上编写的。指导委员会讨论了其调查结果,并制定了建议和禁忌症,这些建议和禁忌症在与咨询委员会的讨论中得到了完善。根据专业经验、病理生理学知识和理论推理进行了调整,特别是涵盖了以前指南中未讨论的主题,或使建议适应巴西的背景和当前实践。结果共提出55条建议,涵盖以下领域:睡眠研究的申请和解释的专业要求(n = 7);参加不同睡眠研究的资格(n = 9);睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)诊断;N = 5);特殊情况下SDB的诊断(n = 3);与其他睡眠障碍和合并症相关的SDB诊断(n = 3);SDB患者随访的睡眠研究(n = 9);正气压滴定法的睡眠研究(n = 3);其他睡眠障碍的诊断(n = 10);以及其他条件下的睡眠研究(n = 6)。结论睡眠研究类型的选择应考虑资源限制、临床对中度或重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的怀疑以及患者的个体需求等因素。至关重要的是,卫生专业人员在睡眠科学方面接受适当的培训和委员会认证,从而能够确定最合适的诊断方法,了解其适应症和局限性,并确保对每个患者进行准确的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2024 Position Statement on the Use of Different Diagnostic Methods for Sleep Disorders in Adults - Brazilian Sleep Association.

Introduction  The current document represents the official position of Associação Brasileira do Sono (ABS; Brazilian Sleep Association) on the application of different sleep studies and provides specific recommendations for the use of different types of polysomnography (PSG) and respiratory polygraphy. Materials and Methods  The present document was based on existing guidelines. The steering committee discussed its findings and developed recommendations and contraindications, which were refined in discussions with the advisory committee. Adaptations were made based on professional experience, pathophysiological knowledge, and theoretical reasoning, especially to cover topics not discussed in previous guidelines or to adapt recommendations to the context and current practices in Brazil. Results  A total of 55 recommendations were made, covering the following domains: professional requirements for the requisition and interpretation of sleep studies ( n  = 7); eligibility for different sleep studies ( n  = 9); diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB; n  = 5); diagnosis of SDB in special conditions ( n  = 3); diagnosis of SDB in association with other sleep disorders and comorbidities ( n  = 3); sleep studies on the follow-up of patients with SDB ( n  = 9); sleep studies for positive air pressure titration ( n  = 3); diagnosis of other sleep disorders ( n  = 10); and sleep studies on other conditions ( n  = 6). Conclusion  The selection of the type of sleep study should be made carefully, considering resource constraints, clinical suspicion of moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and individual patient needs, among other factors. It is crucial that health professionals receive appropriate training and board certification in sleep science, thus being able to determine the most suitable diagnostic method, understand their indications and limitations, and assure an accurate diagnosis for each patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Science
Sleep Science CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信