机器学习方法在商业条件下对轻量级猪进行分类的适用性。

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txae171
Pau Salgado-López, Joaquim Casellas, Iara Solar Diaz, Thomas Rathje, Josep Gasa, David Solà-Oriol
{"title":"机器学习方法在商业条件下对轻量级猪进行分类的适用性。","authors":"Pau Salgado-López, Joaquim Casellas, Iara Solar Diaz, Thomas Rathje, Josep Gasa, David Solà-Oriol","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The varying growth rates within a group of pigs present a significant challenge for the current all-in-all-out systems in the pig industry. This study evaluated the applicability of statistical methods for classifying pigs at risk of growth retardation at different production stages using a robust dataset collected under commercial conditions. Data from 26,749 crossbred pigs (Yorkshire × Landrace) with Duroc at weaning (17 to 27 d), 15,409 pigs at the end of the nursery period (60 to 78 d), and 4996 pigs at slaughter (151 to 161 d) were analyzed under three different cut points (lowest 10%, 20%, and 30% weights) to characterize light animals. Records were randomly split into training and testing sets in a 2:1 ratio, and each training dataset was analyzed using an ordinary least squares approach and three machine learning algorithms (decision tree, random forest, and generalized boosted regression). The classification performance of each analytical approach was evaluated by the area under the curve (<b>AUC</b>). In all production stages and cut points, the random forest and generalized boosted regression models demonstrated superior classification performance, with AUC estimates ranging from 0.772 to 0.861. The parametric linear model also showed acceptable classification performance, with slightly lower AUC estimates ranging from 0.752 to 0.818. In contrast, the single decision tree was categorized as worthless, with AUC estimates between 0.608 and 0.726. Key prediction factors varied across production stages, with birthweight-related factors being most significant at weaning, and weight at previous stages becoming more crucial later in the production cycle. These findings suggest the potential of machine learning algorithms to improve decision-making and efficiency in pig production systems by accurately identifying pigs at risk of growth retardation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"8 ","pages":"txae171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of machine learning methods for classifying lightweight pigs in commercial conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Pau Salgado-López, Joaquim Casellas, Iara Solar Diaz, Thomas Rathje, Josep Gasa, David Solà-Oriol\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txae171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The varying growth rates within a group of pigs present a significant challenge for the current all-in-all-out systems in the pig industry. This study evaluated the applicability of statistical methods for classifying pigs at risk of growth retardation at different production stages using a robust dataset collected under commercial conditions. Data from 26,749 crossbred pigs (Yorkshire × Landrace) with Duroc at weaning (17 to 27 d), 15,409 pigs at the end of the nursery period (60 to 78 d), and 4996 pigs at slaughter (151 to 161 d) were analyzed under three different cut points (lowest 10%, 20%, and 30% weights) to characterize light animals. Records were randomly split into training and testing sets in a 2:1 ratio, and each training dataset was analyzed using an ordinary least squares approach and three machine learning algorithms (decision tree, random forest, and generalized boosted regression). The classification performance of each analytical approach was evaluated by the area under the curve (<b>AUC</b>). In all production stages and cut points, the random forest and generalized boosted regression models demonstrated superior classification performance, with AUC estimates ranging from 0.772 to 0.861. The parametric linear model also showed acceptable classification performance, with slightly lower AUC estimates ranging from 0.752 to 0.818. In contrast, the single decision tree was categorized as worthless, with AUC estimates between 0.608 and 0.726. Key prediction factors varied across production stages, with birthweight-related factors being most significant at weaning, and weight at previous stages becoming more crucial later in the production cycle. These findings suggest the potential of machine learning algorithms to improve decision-making and efficiency in pig production systems by accurately identifying pigs at risk of growth retardation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"txae171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652721/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

猪群内不同的生长率对当前养猪业的全统筹系统提出了重大挑战。本研究利用在商业条件下收集的稳健数据集,评估了统计方法在不同生产阶段对有生长迟缓风险的猪进行分类的适用性。对26,749头断奶(17 ~ 27 d)、15,409头苗期末(60 ~ 78 d)和4996头屠宰(151 ~ 161 d)的杂交猪(约克×长×长)在三个不同的切点(最低10%、20%和30%体重)下的数据进行分析,以表征轻动物。记录以2:1的比例随机分为训练集和测试集,每个训练数据集使用普通最小二乘法和三种机器学习算法(决策树、随机森林和广义增强回归)进行分析。采用曲线下面积(AUC)评价各分析方法的分类性能。在所有生产阶段和切点,随机森林和广义增强回归模型表现出优异的分类性能,AUC估计范围为0.772至0.861。参数线性模型也显示出可接受的分类性能,AUC估计略低,范围在0.752至0.818之间。相比之下,单一决策树被归类为无价值,AUC估计在0.608和0.726之间。关键的预测因素在不同的生产阶段各不相同,出生体重相关因素在断奶时最为重要,而前几个阶段的体重在生产周期的后期变得更加重要。这些发现表明,机器学习算法有潜力通过准确识别有生长迟缓风险的猪来提高生猪生产系统的决策和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability of machine learning methods for classifying lightweight pigs in commercial conditions.

The varying growth rates within a group of pigs present a significant challenge for the current all-in-all-out systems in the pig industry. This study evaluated the applicability of statistical methods for classifying pigs at risk of growth retardation at different production stages using a robust dataset collected under commercial conditions. Data from 26,749 crossbred pigs (Yorkshire × Landrace) with Duroc at weaning (17 to 27 d), 15,409 pigs at the end of the nursery period (60 to 78 d), and 4996 pigs at slaughter (151 to 161 d) were analyzed under three different cut points (lowest 10%, 20%, and 30% weights) to characterize light animals. Records were randomly split into training and testing sets in a 2:1 ratio, and each training dataset was analyzed using an ordinary least squares approach and three machine learning algorithms (decision tree, random forest, and generalized boosted regression). The classification performance of each analytical approach was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC). In all production stages and cut points, the random forest and generalized boosted regression models demonstrated superior classification performance, with AUC estimates ranging from 0.772 to 0.861. The parametric linear model also showed acceptable classification performance, with slightly lower AUC estimates ranging from 0.752 to 0.818. In contrast, the single decision tree was categorized as worthless, with AUC estimates between 0.608 and 0.726. Key prediction factors varied across production stages, with birthweight-related factors being most significant at weaning, and weight at previous stages becoming more crucial later in the production cycle. These findings suggest the potential of machine learning algorithms to improve decision-making and efficiency in pig production systems by accurately identifying pigs at risk of growth retardation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信