异常高的运动性呼吸困难预示着接受增量循环运动测试的人的死亡率。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0302111
Viktor Elmberg, Xingwu Zhou, Thomas Lindow, Kristofer Hedman, Andrei Malinovschi, Hayley Lewthwaite, Dennis Jensen, Lars Brudin, Magnus Ekström
{"title":"异常高的运动性呼吸困难预示着接受增量循环运动测试的人的死亡率。","authors":"Viktor Elmberg, Xingwu Zhou, Thomas Lindow, Kristofer Hedman, Andrei Malinovschi, Hayley Lewthwaite, Dennis Jensen, Lars Brudin, Magnus Ekström","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0302111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exertional breathlessness is a key symptom in cardiorespiratory disease and can be quantified using incremental exercise testing, but its prognostic significance is unknown. We evaluated the ability of abnormally high breathlessness intensity during incremental cycle exercise testing to predict all-cause, respiratory, and cardiac mortality.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Longitudinal cohort study of adults referred for exercise testing followed prospectively for mortality assessed using the Swedish National Causes of Death Registry. Abnormally high exertional breathlessness was defined as a breathlessness intensity response (Borg 0-10 scale) > the upper limit of normal using published reference equations. Mortality was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression, unadjusted and adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. A further mortality analysis was also done adjusted for select common comorbidities in addition to age, sex and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13,506 people included (46% female, age 59±15 years), 2,867 (21%) had abnormally high breathlessness during exercise testing. Over a median follow up of 8.0 years, 1,687 (12%) people died. No participant was lost to follow-up. Compared to those within normal predicted ranges, people with abnormally high exertional breathlessness had higher mortality from all causes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.3, [95% confidence interval] 2.1-2.6), respiratory causes (aHR 5.2 [3.4-8.0]) and cardiac causes (aHR 3.0 [2.5-3.6]). Even among people with normal exercise capacity (defined as peak Watt ≥75% of predicted exercise capacity, n = 10,284) those with abnormally high exertional breathlessness were at greater risk of all-cause mortality than people with exertional breathlessness within the normal predicted range (aHR 1.5 [1.2-1.8]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among people referred for exercise testing, abnormally high exertional breathlessness, quantified using healthy reference values, independently predicted all-cause, respiratory and cardiac mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0302111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abnormally high exertional breathlessness predicts mortality in people referred for incremental cycle exercise testing.\",\"authors\":\"Viktor Elmberg, Xingwu Zhou, Thomas Lindow, Kristofer Hedman, Andrei Malinovschi, Hayley Lewthwaite, Dennis Jensen, Lars Brudin, Magnus Ekström\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0302111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exertional breathlessness is a key symptom in cardiorespiratory disease and can be quantified using incremental exercise testing, but its prognostic significance is unknown. We evaluated the ability of abnormally high breathlessness intensity during incremental cycle exercise testing to predict all-cause, respiratory, and cardiac mortality.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Longitudinal cohort study of adults referred for exercise testing followed prospectively for mortality assessed using the Swedish National Causes of Death Registry. Abnormally high exertional breathlessness was defined as a breathlessness intensity response (Borg 0-10 scale) > the upper limit of normal using published reference equations. Mortality was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression, unadjusted and adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. A further mortality analysis was also done adjusted for select common comorbidities in addition to age, sex and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13,506 people included (46% female, age 59±15 years), 2,867 (21%) had abnormally high breathlessness during exercise testing. Over a median follow up of 8.0 years, 1,687 (12%) people died. No participant was lost to follow-up. Compared to those within normal predicted ranges, people with abnormally high exertional breathlessness had higher mortality from all causes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.3, [95% confidence interval] 2.1-2.6), respiratory causes (aHR 5.2 [3.4-8.0]) and cardiac causes (aHR 3.0 [2.5-3.6]). Even among people with normal exercise capacity (defined as peak Watt ≥75% of predicted exercise capacity, n = 10,284) those with abnormally high exertional breathlessness were at greater risk of all-cause mortality than people with exertional breathlessness within the normal predicted range (aHR 1.5 [1.2-1.8]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among people referred for exercise testing, abnormally high exertional breathlessness, quantified using healthy reference values, independently predicted all-cause, respiratory and cardiac mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"e0302111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654960/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动性呼吸困难是心肺疾病的关键症状,可通过增量运动试验进行量化,但其预后意义尚不清楚。我们评估了在增量循环运动试验中异常高的呼吸困难强度预测全因死亡率、呼吸死亡率和心脏死亡率的能力。研究设计和方法:对成年人进行纵向队列研究,进行运动试验,随后使用瑞典国家死亡原因登记处对死亡率进行前瞻性评估。使用已发表的参考方程,将异常高的运动性呼吸困难定义为呼吸强度反应(Borg 0-10量表)为正常上限。死亡率分析采用多变量Cox回归,未调整和调整年龄、性别和体重指数。进一步的死亡率分析也进行了调整,以选择常见的合并症,除了年龄,性别和体重指数。结果:在纳入的13506人中(46%为女性,年龄59±15岁),2,867人(21%)在运动测试中出现异常的高度呼吸困难。在中位8年的随访中,1,687人(12%)死亡。没有参与者失去随访。与正常预测范围内的人相比,异常高度劳累性呼吸困难的人所有原因的死亡率更高(校正危险比[aHR] 2.3,[95%置信区间]2.1-2.6),呼吸原因(aHR 5.2[3.4-8.0])和心脏原因(aHR 3.0[2.5-3.6])。即使在运动能力正常的人群中(定义为峰值瓦特≥预测运动能力的75%,n = 10,284),与正常预测范围内的运动性呼吸困难患者相比,异常高的运动性呼吸困难患者的全因死亡率风险更高(aHR 1.5[1.2-1.8])。结论:在接受运动试验的人群中,异常高的运动性呼吸困难,用健康参考值量化,独立预测全因、呼吸和心脏死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Abnormally high exertional breathlessness predicts mortality in people referred for incremental cycle exercise testing.

Abnormally high exertional breathlessness predicts mortality in people referred for incremental cycle exercise testing.

Abnormally high exertional breathlessness predicts mortality in people referred for incremental cycle exercise testing.

Abnormally high exertional breathlessness predicts mortality in people referred for incremental cycle exercise testing.

Background: Exertional breathlessness is a key symptom in cardiorespiratory disease and can be quantified using incremental exercise testing, but its prognostic significance is unknown. We evaluated the ability of abnormally high breathlessness intensity during incremental cycle exercise testing to predict all-cause, respiratory, and cardiac mortality.

Study design and methods: Longitudinal cohort study of adults referred for exercise testing followed prospectively for mortality assessed using the Swedish National Causes of Death Registry. Abnormally high exertional breathlessness was defined as a breathlessness intensity response (Borg 0-10 scale) > the upper limit of normal using published reference equations. Mortality was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression, unadjusted and adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. A further mortality analysis was also done adjusted for select common comorbidities in addition to age, sex and body mass index.

Results: Of the 13,506 people included (46% female, age 59±15 years), 2,867 (21%) had abnormally high breathlessness during exercise testing. Over a median follow up of 8.0 years, 1,687 (12%) people died. No participant was lost to follow-up. Compared to those within normal predicted ranges, people with abnormally high exertional breathlessness had higher mortality from all causes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.3, [95% confidence interval] 2.1-2.6), respiratory causes (aHR 5.2 [3.4-8.0]) and cardiac causes (aHR 3.0 [2.5-3.6]). Even among people with normal exercise capacity (defined as peak Watt ≥75% of predicted exercise capacity, n = 10,284) those with abnormally high exertional breathlessness were at greater risk of all-cause mortality than people with exertional breathlessness within the normal predicted range (aHR 1.5 [1.2-1.8]).

Conclusion: Among people referred for exercise testing, abnormally high exertional breathlessness, quantified using healthy reference values, independently predicted all-cause, respiratory and cardiac mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信