电子烟威斯康星州吸烟依赖动机清单(e-WISDM)在独家电子烟用户中的有效性:来自实验室自我管理研究的证据。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Thomas M Piasecki, Claudia E Korcarz, Kristin M Hansen, Daniel M Bolt, Michael C Fiore, James H Stein, Timothy B Baker
{"title":"电子烟威斯康星州吸烟依赖动机清单(e-WISDM)在独家电子烟用户中的有效性:来自实验室自我管理研究的证据。","authors":"Thomas M Piasecki, Claudia E Korcarz, Kristin M Hansen, Daniel M Bolt, Michael C Fiore, James H Stein, Timothy B Baker","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prior research suggests that the e-Cigarette Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (e-WISDM) distinguishes primary (e-PDM) and secondary dependence (e-SDM), however, there is little research on these e-WISDM dimensions and prior research comprised dual users (using cigarettes and e-cigarettes) and those using older generations of e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Those exclusively using contemporary e-cigarettes (N = 164) completed the e-WISDM and a laboratory self-administration session and rated pre-use expectancies and post-use experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only a 1-factor model limited to the primary scales (Automaticity, Tolerance, Craving, Loss of Control) achieved good model fit. The e-PDM was correlated with the Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PS-ECDI), r = .79, p < .001. The e-PDM and PS-ECDI were similarly correlated with use topography and self-reported measures. Analyses of motive profiles identified Taste, Tolerance, and Automaticity as the most strongly endorsed motives in the full sample. Subgroup analyses indicated primary motives were more elevated in in daily vs. non-daily e-cigarette users and participants with vs. without a history of smoking cigarettes. Taste motives were stronger in users of 3rd vs. 4th generation e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the four e-PDM subscales are a concise, reliable, and valid measure of core e-cigarette dependence motives that are related to meaningful dependence attributes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are dependence-producing. Instruments that measure e-cigarette dependence are necessary to identify users who may have difficulty quitting e-cigarettes and who are at risk for use-related harms. The four subscales of the e-WISDM PDM index self-reported heavy e-cigarette use, craving, automatic or mindless use, and perceived loss of control over use. The current research supports the validity of the e-WISDM PDM as a measure of core e-cigarette dependence in users of today's e-cigarette devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of the E-Cigarette Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (e-WISDM) in Exclusive E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from a Laboratory Self-Administration Study.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas M Piasecki, Claudia E Korcarz, Kristin M Hansen, Daniel M Bolt, Michael C Fiore, James H Stein, Timothy B Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prior research suggests that the e-Cigarette Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (e-WISDM) distinguishes primary (e-PDM) and secondary dependence (e-SDM), however, there is little research on these e-WISDM dimensions and prior research comprised dual users (using cigarettes and e-cigarettes) and those using older generations of e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Those exclusively using contemporary e-cigarettes (N = 164) completed the e-WISDM and a laboratory self-administration session and rated pre-use expectancies and post-use experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only a 1-factor model limited to the primary scales (Automaticity, Tolerance, Craving, Loss of Control) achieved good model fit. The e-PDM was correlated with the Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PS-ECDI), r = .79, p < .001. The e-PDM and PS-ECDI were similarly correlated with use topography and self-reported measures. Analyses of motive profiles identified Taste, Tolerance, and Automaticity as the most strongly endorsed motives in the full sample. Subgroup analyses indicated primary motives were more elevated in in daily vs. non-daily e-cigarette users and participants with vs. without a history of smoking cigarettes. Taste motives were stronger in users of 3rd vs. 4th generation e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the four e-PDM subscales are a concise, reliable, and valid measure of core e-cigarette dependence motives that are related to meaningful dependence attributes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are dependence-producing. Instruments that measure e-cigarette dependence are necessary to identify users who may have difficulty quitting e-cigarettes and who are at risk for use-related harms. The four subscales of the e-WISDM PDM index self-reported heavy e-cigarette use, craving, automatic or mindless use, and perceived loss of control over use. The current research supports the validity of the e-WISDM PDM as a measure of core e-cigarette dependence in users of today's e-cigarette devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae302\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,电子烟威斯康星州吸烟依赖动机清单(e-WISDM)区分了主要(e-PDM)和次要依赖(e-SDM),然而,对这些e-WISDM维度的研究很少,并且先前的研究包括双重用户(使用香烟和电子烟)和使用老一代电子烟的用户。方法:仅使用现代电子烟的患者(N = 164)完成了e-WISDM和实验室自我管理课程,并对使用前期望和使用后体验进行了评分。结果:只有一个局限于主要量表(自动性、耐受性、渴望、失去控制)的单因素模型获得了良好的模型拟合。e-PDM与宾夕法尼亚州立大学电子烟依赖指数(PS-ECDI)相关,r = 0.79, p < 0.001。e-PDM和PS-ECDI与使用地形和自我报告测量相似。对动机特征的分析表明,品味、宽容和自动性是整个样本中最受认可的动机。亚组分析表明,每日电子烟使用者与非每日电子烟使用者、有吸烟史与无吸烟史的参与者的主要动机更高。第三代电子烟用户的口味动机比第四代电子烟更强。结论:这些研究结果表明,四个e-PDM分量表是与有意义依赖属性相关的核心电子烟依赖动机的简洁、可靠和有效的测量方法。启示:电子烟(电子烟)产生依赖性。测量电子烟依赖性的工具对于识别可能难以戒掉电子烟的用户和有使用相关危害风险的用户是必要的。e-WISDM PDM指数的四个分量表自我报告了重度电子烟使用、渴望、自动或无意识使用以及对使用失去控制的感觉。目前的研究支持了e-WISDM PDM作为衡量当今电子烟设备用户核心电子烟依赖程度的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of the E-Cigarette Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (e-WISDM) in Exclusive E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from a Laboratory Self-Administration Study.

Introduction: Prior research suggests that the e-Cigarette Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (e-WISDM) distinguishes primary (e-PDM) and secondary dependence (e-SDM), however, there is little research on these e-WISDM dimensions and prior research comprised dual users (using cigarettes and e-cigarettes) and those using older generations of e-cigarettes.

Methods: Those exclusively using contemporary e-cigarettes (N = 164) completed the e-WISDM and a laboratory self-administration session and rated pre-use expectancies and post-use experiences.

Results: Only a 1-factor model limited to the primary scales (Automaticity, Tolerance, Craving, Loss of Control) achieved good model fit. The e-PDM was correlated with the Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PS-ECDI), r = .79, p < .001. The e-PDM and PS-ECDI were similarly correlated with use topography and self-reported measures. Analyses of motive profiles identified Taste, Tolerance, and Automaticity as the most strongly endorsed motives in the full sample. Subgroup analyses indicated primary motives were more elevated in in daily vs. non-daily e-cigarette users and participants with vs. without a history of smoking cigarettes. Taste motives were stronger in users of 3rd vs. 4th generation e-cigarettes.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the four e-PDM subscales are a concise, reliable, and valid measure of core e-cigarette dependence motives that are related to meaningful dependence attributes.

Implications: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are dependence-producing. Instruments that measure e-cigarette dependence are necessary to identify users who may have difficulty quitting e-cigarettes and who are at risk for use-related harms. The four subscales of the e-WISDM PDM index self-reported heavy e-cigarette use, craving, automatic or mindless use, and perceived loss of control over use. The current research supports the validity of the e-WISDM PDM as a measure of core e-cigarette dependence in users of today's e-cigarette devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信