使用商业虚拟现实耳机自动测量斜视角度。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2466-0284
Rino Vicini, Dominik Brügger, Hilary Grabe, Mathias Abegg
{"title":"使用商业虚拟现实耳机自动测量斜视角度。","authors":"Rino Vicini, Dominik Brügger, Hilary Grabe, Mathias Abegg","doi":"10.1055/a-2466-0284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current clinical measurements of strabismus angles (SAs) are manual and require a skilled examiner and active cooperation by patients. This results in high interexaminer variability, and clinical use is limited by the availability of trained examiners. An objective and automated procedure, independent of the examiner, would be useful. This single-center, prospective, diagnostic feasibility study compared the vertical and horizontal SA of patients, as measured with a commercially available virtual reality headset (VRH) and custom software with the gold standard measurements performed manually with the Harms tangent screen (HW) and the alternate prism cover test (ACT). We implemented the ACT by showing the patient a fixation target on each eye alternatively with the VRH while recording the eye position of the patient. We then processed the data with custom written software to calculate the SA of the patients. These measurements were then compared to the SA measured with HW and the clinical ACT. Thirty-three patients took part in our study. We found good correlation between the VRH method and the HW as well as the clinical ACT. Best correlation was found for horizontal SA in the primary position, with the vertical SA in the primary position also correlating well. Peripheral gaze resulted in a slightly lower correlation due to the overestimation of horizontal SA and underestimation of vertical SA; cyclorotation was not measured with the VRH. Overall, VRH, HW, and clinical ACT correlated similarly well as the published interexaminer correlation for ACT. The automated measurement of strabismus with a VRH is feasible, easily applicable, fast, accurate, and can be run on consumer hardware that is affordable and increasingly available.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":"485-488"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Measurement of Strabismus Angle Using a Commercial Virtual Reality Headset.\",\"authors\":\"Rino Vicini, Dominik Brügger, Hilary Grabe, Mathias Abegg\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2466-0284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current clinical measurements of strabismus angles (SAs) are manual and require a skilled examiner and active cooperation by patients. This results in high interexaminer variability, and clinical use is limited by the availability of trained examiners. An objective and automated procedure, independent of the examiner, would be useful. This single-center, prospective, diagnostic feasibility study compared the vertical and horizontal SA of patients, as measured with a commercially available virtual reality headset (VRH) and custom software with the gold standard measurements performed manually with the Harms tangent screen (HW) and the alternate prism cover test (ACT). We implemented the ACT by showing the patient a fixation target on each eye alternatively with the VRH while recording the eye position of the patient. We then processed the data with custom written software to calculate the SA of the patients. These measurements were then compared to the SA measured with HW and the clinical ACT. Thirty-three patients took part in our study. We found good correlation between the VRH method and the HW as well as the clinical ACT. Best correlation was found for horizontal SA in the primary position, with the vertical SA in the primary position also correlating well. Peripheral gaze resulted in a slightly lower correlation due to the overestimation of horizontal SA and underestimation of vertical SA; cyclorotation was not measured with the VRH. Overall, VRH, HW, and clinical ACT correlated similarly well as the published interexaminer correlation for ACT. The automated measurement of strabismus with a VRH is feasible, easily applicable, fast, accurate, and can be run on consumer hardware that is affordable and increasingly available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"485-488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2466-0284\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2466-0284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前斜视角度的临床测量是手动的,需要熟练的检查人员和患者的积极配合。这导致检查员之间的高度可变性,临床使用受到训练有素的检查员的可用性的限制。一个独立于审查员的客观和自动化的程序将是有用的。这项单中心、前瞻性、诊断可行性研究比较了用市售虚拟现实耳机(VRH)和定制软件测量的患者的垂直和水平SA,以及用Harms正切屏幕(HW)和交替棱镜盖测试(ACT)手动测量的金标准SA。我们通过向患者展示每只眼睛上的固定目标和VRH来实现ACT,同时记录患者的眼睛位置。然后我们用定制的软件对数据进行处理,计算患者的SA。然后将这些测量结果与HW和临床ACT测量的SA进行比较。33名患者参加了我们的研究。我们发现VRH方法与HW及临床ACT有良好的相关性。主要位置的水平SA相关性最好,主要位置的垂直SA相关性也很好。外周注视对水平SA的估计过高,对垂直SA的估计过低,导致相关性略低;VRH未测量旋转。总体而言,VRH、HW和临床ACT的相关性与已发表的ACT之间的相关性相似。使用VRH自动测量斜视是可行的,易于应用,快速,准确,并且可以在价格合理且越来越多的消费级硬件上运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated Measurement of Strabismus Angle Using a Commercial Virtual Reality Headset.

Current clinical measurements of strabismus angles (SAs) are manual and require a skilled examiner and active cooperation by patients. This results in high interexaminer variability, and clinical use is limited by the availability of trained examiners. An objective and automated procedure, independent of the examiner, would be useful. This single-center, prospective, diagnostic feasibility study compared the vertical and horizontal SA of patients, as measured with a commercially available virtual reality headset (VRH) and custom software with the gold standard measurements performed manually with the Harms tangent screen (HW) and the alternate prism cover test (ACT). We implemented the ACT by showing the patient a fixation target on each eye alternatively with the VRH while recording the eye position of the patient. We then processed the data with custom written software to calculate the SA of the patients. These measurements were then compared to the SA measured with HW and the clinical ACT. Thirty-three patients took part in our study. We found good correlation between the VRH method and the HW as well as the clinical ACT. Best correlation was found for horizontal SA in the primary position, with the vertical SA in the primary position also correlating well. Peripheral gaze resulted in a slightly lower correlation due to the overestimation of horizontal SA and underestimation of vertical SA; cyclorotation was not measured with the VRH. Overall, VRH, HW, and clinical ACT correlated similarly well as the published interexaminer correlation for ACT. The automated measurement of strabismus with a VRH is feasible, easily applicable, fast, accurate, and can be run on consumer hardware that is affordable and increasingly available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信