摘要。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"摘要。","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Aim:</b> Interventionalist experience high-lifetime radiation dosages due to the use of pulsed fluoroscopy. They also experience orthopaedic problems due to the necessity of wearing lead gowns to protect from this radiation. To alleviate both the radiation and orthopaedic issues, we trialled an innovative shielding system, Rampart (tm) which surrounds the patient's torso with lead equivalent acrylic shielding. Our trial period coincided with the initial COVID-19 outbreak and lockdowns which provided an additional use of the shielding as a protection from spread of COVID-19 infection from patients.</p><p><b>Method:</b> Using Ray safe (tm) i3 Dosimeters, we measured primary operator radiation dosimetry. This was measured at the head (H), upper torso (T) and waist height (W). Both with the Rampart (tm) shield and without it. The measurements were conducted over a usual week's case load.</p><p><b>Results:</b> 20 cases were performed, 10 with the Rampart (tm) system in place and 10 without. At the primary operator position we found an effective radiation attenuation of H: 70.3%, T: 98.3%, W: 99.5% with lead gowns. Compared to an effective radiation attenuation just using the Rampart(tm) external shielding of H: 89.3%, T: 92.4%, W: 89.0%. Using both lead gowns and the Rampart (tm) gave over 99.9 %. Airflow test also showed a laminar air flow away from the operator from the patient's head.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Whilst not as effective alone as lead gowns in radiation attenuation, the Rampart (tm) system was demonstrated to be an effective radiation safety device with the possibility of no lead or lighter lead use. Additional benefits that were observed from its use included significant radiation protection to the operator, protection to body areas not protected by lead, (head arms) as well shielding from direct aerosol contact with the patient which has proven to be an important consideration in the current COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 8","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13764","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IRSA ASM 2024 Abstract\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Aim:</b> Interventionalist experience high-lifetime radiation dosages due to the use of pulsed fluoroscopy. They also experience orthopaedic problems due to the necessity of wearing lead gowns to protect from this radiation. To alleviate both the radiation and orthopaedic issues, we trialled an innovative shielding system, Rampart (tm) which surrounds the patient's torso with lead equivalent acrylic shielding. Our trial period coincided with the initial COVID-19 outbreak and lockdowns which provided an additional use of the shielding as a protection from spread of COVID-19 infection from patients.</p><p><b>Method:</b> Using Ray safe (tm) i3 Dosimeters, we measured primary operator radiation dosimetry. This was measured at the head (H), upper torso (T) and waist height (W). Both with the Rampart (tm) shield and without it. The measurements were conducted over a usual week's case load.</p><p><b>Results:</b> 20 cases were performed, 10 with the Rampart (tm) system in place and 10 without. At the primary operator position we found an effective radiation attenuation of H: 70.3%, T: 98.3%, W: 99.5% with lead gowns. Compared to an effective radiation attenuation just using the Rampart(tm) external shielding of H: 89.3%, T: 92.4%, W: 89.0%. Using both lead gowns and the Rampart (tm) gave over 99.9 %. Airflow test also showed a laminar air flow away from the operator from the patient's head.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Whilst not as effective alone as lead gowns in radiation attenuation, the Rampart (tm) system was demonstrated to be an effective radiation safety device with the possibility of no lead or lighter lead use. Additional benefits that were observed from its use included significant radiation protection to the operator, protection to body areas not protected by lead, (head arms) as well shielding from direct aerosol contact with the patient which has proven to be an important consideration in the current COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"68 8\",\"pages\":\"e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13764\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13764\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13764","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IRSA ASM 2024 Abstract

Aim: Interventionalist experience high-lifetime radiation dosages due to the use of pulsed fluoroscopy. They also experience orthopaedic problems due to the necessity of wearing lead gowns to protect from this radiation. To alleviate both the radiation and orthopaedic issues, we trialled an innovative shielding system, Rampart (tm) which surrounds the patient's torso with lead equivalent acrylic shielding. Our trial period coincided with the initial COVID-19 outbreak and lockdowns which provided an additional use of the shielding as a protection from spread of COVID-19 infection from patients.

Method: Using Ray safe (tm) i3 Dosimeters, we measured primary operator radiation dosimetry. This was measured at the head (H), upper torso (T) and waist height (W). Both with the Rampart (tm) shield and without it. The measurements were conducted over a usual week's case load.

Results: 20 cases were performed, 10 with the Rampart (tm) system in place and 10 without. At the primary operator position we found an effective radiation attenuation of H: 70.3%, T: 98.3%, W: 99.5% with lead gowns. Compared to an effective radiation attenuation just using the Rampart(tm) external shielding of H: 89.3%, T: 92.4%, W: 89.0%. Using both lead gowns and the Rampart (tm) gave over 99.9 %. Airflow test also showed a laminar air flow away from the operator from the patient's head.

Conclusion: Whilst not as effective alone as lead gowns in radiation attenuation, the Rampart (tm) system was demonstrated to be an effective radiation safety device with the possibility of no lead or lighter lead use. Additional benefits that were observed from its use included significant radiation protection to the operator, protection to body areas not protected by lead, (head arms) as well shielding from direct aerosol contact with the patient which has proven to be an important consideration in the current COVID-19 pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信