{"title":"摘要。","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Aim:</b> Radiological interventions are increasingly complex and also increasingly performed on high body mass index (BMI) patients. As such we sought to quantify the radiation dose to the eyes of the operator, the dose area product and skin dose to the patient, as well as variations in cardiac angiographic image quality. Over the range of normal to high BMI's.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Five thickness of Acrylic 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 cm were used to simulate increasing patient BMI. The patient dose area product and skin dose were measured from the built-in metering systems of the angiographic system. The simulated operator eye dose was measured using (Rando) tm Phantom and a (Unfors)tm radiation detector at 150–170 cm in 5 cm gradients at the primary operator position. For image quality measurement, a Westmead testing object was used to test high and low contrast range and line pairs per 0.5 mm.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Our study shows that whilst a low-grade linear decrease in image quality and corresponding rise in radiation dose is seen over the standard patient BMI ranges. There is a very large nonlinear drop in image quality and corresponding large rise in radiation dose in the high BMI patient range (over 25) using standard settings. Our secondary aim was proven in the results showing the high effectiveness (over 90%) of the standard lead equivalent acrylic shielding in protecting the operators' eyes. Especially for the very high levels found in the extreme patient size cohort.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> These results indicate the important need of the radiographers' role in radiation safety. Selecting the most efficient frame rate/Ma settings possible, positioning of the detector, monitoring of ongoing case dose and that operators are using radiation protection equipment, especially the ceiling acrylic (Pb) shield for the higher BMI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 8","pages":"e3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13763","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IRSA ASM 2024 Abstract\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Aim:</b> Radiological interventions are increasingly complex and also increasingly performed on high body mass index (BMI) patients. As such we sought to quantify the radiation dose to the eyes of the operator, the dose area product and skin dose to the patient, as well as variations in cardiac angiographic image quality. Over the range of normal to high BMI's.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Five thickness of Acrylic 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 cm were used to simulate increasing patient BMI. The patient dose area product and skin dose were measured from the built-in metering systems of the angiographic system. The simulated operator eye dose was measured using (Rando) tm Phantom and a (Unfors)tm radiation detector at 150–170 cm in 5 cm gradients at the primary operator position. For image quality measurement, a Westmead testing object was used to test high and low contrast range and line pairs per 0.5 mm.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Our study shows that whilst a low-grade linear decrease in image quality and corresponding rise in radiation dose is seen over the standard patient BMI ranges. There is a very large nonlinear drop in image quality and corresponding large rise in radiation dose in the high BMI patient range (over 25) using standard settings. Our secondary aim was proven in the results showing the high effectiveness (over 90%) of the standard lead equivalent acrylic shielding in protecting the operators' eyes. Especially for the very high levels found in the extreme patient size cohort.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> These results indicate the important need of the radiographers' role in radiation safety. Selecting the most efficient frame rate/Ma settings possible, positioning of the detector, monitoring of ongoing case dose and that operators are using radiation protection equipment, especially the ceiling acrylic (Pb) shield for the higher BMI patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"68 8\",\"pages\":\"e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13763\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13763\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:放射干预越来越复杂,也越来越多地用于高体重指数(BMI)患者。因此,我们试图量化操作者眼睛的辐射剂量,剂量面积积和患者皮肤剂量,以及心脏血管造影图像质量的变化。超过了正常到高BMI的范围。方法:采用15、20、25、30、35 cm 5种厚度的丙烯酸树脂模拟患者BMI的增加。患者剂量面积积和皮肤剂量由血管造影系统内置的计量系统测量。使用(Rando) tm Phantom和(Unfors)tm辐射探测器在主要操作人员位置以5厘米梯度在150-170厘米处测量模拟操作人员眼睛剂量。对于图像质量测量,使用Westmead测试对象测试每0.5 mm高、低对比度范围和线对。结果:我们的研究表明,在标准患者BMI范围内,图像质量呈低等级线性下降,辐射剂量相应上升。使用标准设置,在高BMI患者范围内(超过25),图像质量会出现非常大的非线性下降,相应的辐射剂量也会大幅上升。我们的第二个目标在结果中得到证实,显示标准铅当量丙烯酸屏蔽在保护操作人员眼睛方面的有效性(超过90%)。特别是在极端患者体型的队列中发现的非常高的水平。结论:放射技师在放射安全工作中发挥重要作用。选择最有效的帧速率/Ma设置,定位探测器,监测正在进行的病例剂量,并确保操作人员使用辐射防护设备,特别是针对高BMI患者的天花板丙烯酸(Pb)屏蔽。
Aim: Radiological interventions are increasingly complex and also increasingly performed on high body mass index (BMI) patients. As such we sought to quantify the radiation dose to the eyes of the operator, the dose area product and skin dose to the patient, as well as variations in cardiac angiographic image quality. Over the range of normal to high BMI's.
Methods: Five thickness of Acrylic 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 cm were used to simulate increasing patient BMI. The patient dose area product and skin dose were measured from the built-in metering systems of the angiographic system. The simulated operator eye dose was measured using (Rando) tm Phantom and a (Unfors)tm radiation detector at 150–170 cm in 5 cm gradients at the primary operator position. For image quality measurement, a Westmead testing object was used to test high and low contrast range and line pairs per 0.5 mm.
Results: Our study shows that whilst a low-grade linear decrease in image quality and corresponding rise in radiation dose is seen over the standard patient BMI ranges. There is a very large nonlinear drop in image quality and corresponding large rise in radiation dose in the high BMI patient range (over 25) using standard settings. Our secondary aim was proven in the results showing the high effectiveness (over 90%) of the standard lead equivalent acrylic shielding in protecting the operators' eyes. Especially for the very high levels found in the extreme patient size cohort.
Conclusion: These results indicate the important need of the radiographers' role in radiation safety. Selecting the most efficient frame rate/Ma settings possible, positioning of the detector, monitoring of ongoing case dose and that operators are using radiation protection equipment, especially the ceiling acrylic (Pb) shield for the higher BMI patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.