让青少年和年轻人参与基因组研究结果返回的决策:混合方法纵向临床试验方案的研究方案。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Amy A Blumling, Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Kristin Childers-Buschle, Lisa J Martin, John A Lynch, Kevin R Dufendach, Ellen A Lipstein, Melinda Butsch Kovacic, William B Brinkman, Melanie F Myers
{"title":"让青少年和年轻人参与基因组研究结果返回的决策:混合方法纵向临床试验方案的研究方案。","authors":"Amy A Blumling, Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Kristin Childers-Buschle, Lisa J Martin, John A Lynch, Kevin R Dufendach, Ellen A Lipstein, Melinda Butsch Kovacic, William B Brinkman, Melanie F Myers","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02784-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To protect minors' future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child's secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. In this manuscript, we report on the methods for a clinical trial that examines adolescents', young adults', and their parents' decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent or young adult.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We are enrolling assenting (ages 13-17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18-21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining (1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and (2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants' choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and autosomal recessive carrier results.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genomic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04481061. Registered 22 July 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"24 1","pages":"391"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging adolescents and young adults in decisions about return of genomic research results: study protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Amy A Blumling, Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Kristin Childers-Buschle, Lisa J Martin, John A Lynch, Kevin R Dufendach, Ellen A Lipstein, Melinda Butsch Kovacic, William B Brinkman, Melanie F Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-024-02784-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To protect minors' future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child's secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. In this manuscript, we report on the methods for a clinical trial that examines adolescents', young adults', and their parents' decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent or young adult.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We are enrolling assenting (ages 13-17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18-21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining (1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and (2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants' choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and autosomal recessive carrier results.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genomic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04481061. Registered 22 July 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657641/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02784-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02784-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了保护未成年人未来的自主权,专业组织历来不鼓励将预测成人发病的基因检测结果和携带者状态返回给儿童。最近的临床指导与这一规范有所不同,建议当未成年人为临床目的进行基因组测序时,父母和孩子应该有机会了解次要发现,包括一些成人发病的疾病。虽然父母目前可以选择接受或不接受孩子的次要发现,但美国人类遗传学学会儿童遗传和基因组测试工作组建议,在决策过程中应包括青少年。然而,目前尚不清楚当年轻人有机会自己学习基因发现时,他们会考虑哪些因素。在这篇论文中,我们报告了一项临床试验的方法,该试验检查了青少年、年轻人和他们的父母在为青少年或年轻人学习基因组信息方面的决定。方法:我们招募同意(13-17岁)的青少年和同意(18-21岁)的年轻人参与一项前瞻性基因组筛查研究,以评估他们对接受个体基因组结果的选择。参与者使用一个在线工具来表明他们是否想了解他们个人在特定的可预防、可治疗和成人发病疾病方面的遗传风险,以及常染色体隐性疾病的携带者状态。我们正在研究(1)青少年和年轻人群体(以及青少年/年轻人和父母之间)的选择有何不同,(2)跨研究时间点的决策冲突和稳定性。结果将根据参与者的选择返回。对一部分参与者进行定性访谈,探讨决策稳定性、青少年/年轻人参与父母决策、学习致病性/可能致病性和常染色体隐性携带者结果的影响。讨论:本研究探讨了青少年和父母之间的决策和决策稳定性(如适用),以及临床级基因研究结果返回青少年和年轻人的伦理含义和影响。本研究的结果将提供经验证据,以支持让年轻人参与基因组研究和临床护理的最佳实践和指导,从而提供结果回报。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04481061。注册2020年7月22日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engaging adolescents and young adults in decisions about return of genomic research results: study protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol.

Background: To protect minors' future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child's secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. In this manuscript, we report on the methods for a clinical trial that examines adolescents', young adults', and their parents' decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent or young adult.

Methods: We are enrolling assenting (ages 13-17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18-21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining (1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and (2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants' choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and autosomal recessive carrier results.

Discussion: This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genomic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04481061. Registered 22 July 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信