巴西替尼治疗中度肾功能损害类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Akira Maeyama, Masakazu Kondo, Hiroshi Harada, Eisuke Shono, Ryuji Nagamine, Tomomi Tsuru, Yasushi Inoue, Munetoshi Nakashima, Yutaro Yamasaki, Hiroaki Niiro, Yasuharu Nakashima, Takuaki Yamamoto
{"title":"巴西替尼治疗中度肾功能损害类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究","authors":"Akira Maeyama, Masakazu Kondo, Hiroshi Harada, Eisuke Shono, Ryuji Nagamine, Tomomi Tsuru, Yasushi Inoue, Munetoshi Nakashima, Yutaro Yamasaki, Hiroaki Niiro, Yasuharu Nakashima, Takuaki Yamamoto","doi":"10.1186/s41927-024-00446-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving different doses based on renal function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study within the JAK Study Group, involving 23 facilities in Fukuoka Prefecture, examining patients treated with baricitinib for RA. Patients were categorized into two dose groups: 4 mg with normal/mild renal dysfunction and 2 mg with moderate renal dysfunction. Baricitinib's efficacy, retention rate, and safety were compared between the groups after propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, disease duration, methotrexate dosage, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity rate were balanced across 33 patients in both groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in tender/swollen joint counts, changes in evaluator/patient global assessments, achievement rate of low disease activity, remission rate on clinical/simplified disease activity indices, or retention rate. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events aligned with previous reports, indicating similar drug safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baricitinib 2 mg in RA patients with moderate renal dysfunction showed comparable efficacy and retention rate to 4 mg in patients with normal/mild renal dysfunction. The incidence and types of adverse events were consistent with previous studies, indicating the safety of the drug at these dosages.</p>","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"8 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients with moderate renal impairment: a multicenter propensity score matching study.\",\"authors\":\"Akira Maeyama, Masakazu Kondo, Hiroshi Harada, Eisuke Shono, Ryuji Nagamine, Tomomi Tsuru, Yasushi Inoue, Munetoshi Nakashima, Yutaro Yamasaki, Hiroaki Niiro, Yasuharu Nakashima, Takuaki Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41927-024-00446-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving different doses based on renal function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study within the JAK Study Group, involving 23 facilities in Fukuoka Prefecture, examining patients treated with baricitinib for RA. Patients were categorized into two dose groups: 4 mg with normal/mild renal dysfunction and 2 mg with moderate renal dysfunction. Baricitinib's efficacy, retention rate, and safety were compared between the groups after propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, disease duration, methotrexate dosage, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity rate were balanced across 33 patients in both groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in tender/swollen joint counts, changes in evaluator/patient global assessments, achievement rate of low disease activity, remission rate on clinical/simplified disease activity indices, or retention rate. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events aligned with previous reports, indicating similar drug safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baricitinib 2 mg in RA patients with moderate renal dysfunction showed comparable efficacy and retention rate to 4 mg in patients with normal/mild renal dysfunction. The incidence and types of adverse events were consistent with previous studies, indicating the safety of the drug at these dosages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-024-00446-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-024-00446-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在比较基于肾功能不同剂量的巴西替尼在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:我们在JAK研究组中进行了一项回顾性研究,涉及福冈县的23家机构,检查使用baricitinib治疗RA的患者。患者被分为两个剂量组:正常/轻度肾功能不全4mg和中度肾功能不全2mg。倾向评分匹配后比较各组Baricitinib的疗效、保留率和安全性。结果:经倾向评分匹配后,两组33例患者的病程、甲氨蝶呤剂量和抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性率平衡。在压痛/肿胀关节计数、评估者/患者整体评估的变化、低疾病活动性的成活率、临床/简化疾病活动性指数的缓解率或保留率方面,组间无显著差异。此外,不良事件的发生率与以前的报告一致,表明类似的药物安全性概况。结论:Baricitinib 2mg对中度肾功能不全RA患者的疗效和保留率与正常/轻度肾功能不全患者的4mg相当。不良事件的发生率和类型与先前的研究一致,表明在这些剂量下药物的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients with moderate renal impairment: a multicenter propensity score matching study.

Background: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving different doses based on renal function.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study within the JAK Study Group, involving 23 facilities in Fukuoka Prefecture, examining patients treated with baricitinib for RA. Patients were categorized into two dose groups: 4 mg with normal/mild renal dysfunction and 2 mg with moderate renal dysfunction. Baricitinib's efficacy, retention rate, and safety were compared between the groups after propensity score matching.

Results: After propensity score matching, disease duration, methotrexate dosage, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity rate were balanced across 33 patients in both groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in tender/swollen joint counts, changes in evaluator/patient global assessments, achievement rate of low disease activity, remission rate on clinical/simplified disease activity indices, or retention rate. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events aligned with previous reports, indicating similar drug safety profiles.

Conclusions: Baricitinib 2 mg in RA patients with moderate renal dysfunction showed comparable efficacy and retention rate to 4 mg in patients with normal/mild renal dysfunction. The incidence and types of adverse events were consistent with previous studies, indicating the safety of the drug at these dosages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信