煤矿火灾烟雾暴露后肺功能可能恢复:一项纵向队列研究。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Nicolette R Holt, Catherine L Smith, Caroline X Gao, Brigitte Borg, Tyler Lane, David Brown, Jillian Ikin, Annie Makar, Thomas McCrabb, Mikayla Thomas, Kris Nilsen, Bruce R Thompson, Michael J Abramson
{"title":"煤矿火灾烟雾暴露后肺功能可能恢复:一项纵向队列研究。","authors":"Nicolette R Holt, Catherine L Smith, Caroline X Gao, Brigitte Borg, Tyler Lane, David Brown, Jillian Ikin, Annie Makar, Thomas McCrabb, Mikayla Thomas, Kris Nilsen, Bruce R Thompson, Michael J Abramson","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The 2014 Hazelwood coal mine fire exposed residents in nearby Morwell to high concentrations of particulate matter <2.5 µm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) for approximately 6 weeks. This analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term impact on respiratory health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults from Morwell and the unexposed town of Sale completed validated respiratory questionnaires and performed spirometry, gas transfer and oscillometry 3.5-4 years (round 1) and 7.3-7.8 years (round 2) after the fire. Individual PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure levels were estimated using chemical transport models mapped onto participant-reported time-location data. Mixed-effects regression models were fitted to analyse associations between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and outcomes, controlling for key confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 519 (346 exposed) round 1 participants, 329 (217 exposed) participated in round 2. Spirometry and gas transfer in round 2 were mostly lower compared with round 1, excepting forced vital capacity (FVC) (increased) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (minimal change). The effect of mine fire-related PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure changed from a negative effect in round 1 to no effect in round 2 for both pre-bronchodilator (p=0.005) and post-bronchodilator FVC (p=0.032). PM<sub>2.5</sub> was not associated with gas transfer in either round. For post-bronchodilator reactance and area under the curve, a negative impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in round 1 showed signs of recovery in round 2 (both p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this novel study evaluating long-term respiratory outcomes after medium-duration high concentration PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, the attenuated associations between exposure and respiratory function may indicate some recovery in lung function. With increased frequency and severity of landscape fires observed globally, these results inform public health policies and planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung function may recover after coal mine fire smoke exposure: a longitudinal cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolette R Holt, Catherine L Smith, Caroline X Gao, Brigitte Borg, Tyler Lane, David Brown, Jillian Ikin, Annie Makar, Thomas McCrabb, Mikayla Thomas, Kris Nilsen, Bruce R Thompson, Michael J Abramson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The 2014 Hazelwood coal mine fire exposed residents in nearby Morwell to high concentrations of particulate matter <2.5 µm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) for approximately 6 weeks. This analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term impact on respiratory health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults from Morwell and the unexposed town of Sale completed validated respiratory questionnaires and performed spirometry, gas transfer and oscillometry 3.5-4 years (round 1) and 7.3-7.8 years (round 2) after the fire. Individual PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure levels were estimated using chemical transport models mapped onto participant-reported time-location data. Mixed-effects regression models were fitted to analyse associations between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and outcomes, controlling for key confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 519 (346 exposed) round 1 participants, 329 (217 exposed) participated in round 2. Spirometry and gas transfer in round 2 were mostly lower compared with round 1, excepting forced vital capacity (FVC) (increased) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (minimal change). The effect of mine fire-related PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure changed from a negative effect in round 1 to no effect in round 2 for both pre-bronchodilator (p=0.005) and post-bronchodilator FVC (p=0.032). PM<sub>2.5</sub> was not associated with gas transfer in either round. For post-bronchodilator reactance and area under the curve, a negative impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in round 1 showed signs of recovery in round 2 (both p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this novel study evaluating long-term respiratory outcomes after medium-duration high concentration PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, the attenuated associations between exposure and respiratory function may indicate some recovery in lung function. With increased frequency and severity of landscape fires observed globally, these results inform public health policies and planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:2014年Hazelwood煤矿火灾使附近Morwell的居民暴露在高浓度颗粒物2.5中约6周。该分析旨在评估对呼吸健康的长期影响。方法:火灾发生后3.5 ~ 4年(第1轮)和7.3 ~ 7.8年(第2轮),Morwell镇和未暴露的Sale镇的成年人完成了有效的呼吸问卷,并进行了肺活量测定、气体传递和振荡测量。个体PM2.5暴露水平是通过化学传输模型映射到参与者报告的时间位置数据来估计的。在控制关键混杂因素的情况下,采用混合效应回归模型分析PM2.5暴露与结果之间的关系。结果:519名(346名暴露者)第1轮受试者中,329名(217名暴露者)参加了第2轮。除用力肺活量(FVC)和1秒用力呼气量(变化最小)外,第2轮肺活量和气体传递量均低于第1轮。对于支气管扩张剂前(p=0.005)和支气管扩张剂后(p=0.032)的FVC,矿火相关PM2.5暴露的影响从第1轮的负影响变为第2轮的无影响。在这两种情况下,PM2.5都与气体转移无关。对于支气管扩张剂后抗阻和曲线下面积,第1轮PM2.5的负面影响在第2轮显示出恢复的迹象。结论:在这项评估中持续高浓度PM2.5暴露后长期呼吸结局的新研究中,暴露与呼吸功能之间的减弱关联可能表明肺功能有所恢复。随着全球观测到的景观火灾频率和严重程度的增加,这些结果为公共卫生政策和规划提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lung function may recover after coal mine fire smoke exposure: a longitudinal cohort study.

Background and objective: The 2014 Hazelwood coal mine fire exposed residents in nearby Morwell to high concentrations of particulate matter <2.5 µm (PM2.5) for approximately 6 weeks. This analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term impact on respiratory health.

Methods: Adults from Morwell and the unexposed town of Sale completed validated respiratory questionnaires and performed spirometry, gas transfer and oscillometry 3.5-4 years (round 1) and 7.3-7.8 years (round 2) after the fire. Individual PM2.5 exposure levels were estimated using chemical transport models mapped onto participant-reported time-location data. Mixed-effects regression models were fitted to analyse associations between PM2.5 exposure and outcomes, controlling for key confounders.

Results: From 519 (346 exposed) round 1 participants, 329 (217 exposed) participated in round 2. Spirometry and gas transfer in round 2 were mostly lower compared with round 1, excepting forced vital capacity (FVC) (increased) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (minimal change). The effect of mine fire-related PM2.5 exposure changed from a negative effect in round 1 to no effect in round 2 for both pre-bronchodilator (p=0.005) and post-bronchodilator FVC (p=0.032). PM2.5 was not associated with gas transfer in either round. For post-bronchodilator reactance and area under the curve, a negative impact of PM2.5 in round 1 showed signs of recovery in round 2 (both p<0.001).

Conclusion: In this novel study evaluating long-term respiratory outcomes after medium-duration high concentration PM2.5 exposure, the attenuated associations between exposure and respiratory function may indicate some recovery in lung function. With increased frequency and severity of landscape fires observed globally, these results inform public health policies and planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信