Amanda Roby, Lindsey Harmon, Kelly Sander, Linh Bui, Danai Kitkungvan, Monica Patel, Jagat Narula, Nils P Johnson, K Lance Gould
{"title":"通过正电子发射断层扫描定量心肌灌注和冠状动脉血流容量的可重复性：用于临床实践和试验的3D数字硅光电倍增管固态与传统2D模拟系统。","authors":"Amanda Roby, Lindsey Harmon, Kelly Sander, Linh Bui, Danai Kitkungvan, Monica Patel, Jagat Narula, Nils P Johnson, K Lance Gould","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Quantitative rest-stress myocardial perfusion in millilitres per minute per gram among multiple 2D and 3D positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanners is essential for personalized cardiac management and clinical trials. Accordingly, this study reports the accuracy and precision of quantitative rest-stress millilitres per minute per gram and coronary flow capacity among 2D and two different digital 3D silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) PET-CT scanners for quantifying the severity of coronary pathophysiology for clinical trials or guiding interventions vs. medical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>One hundred seventy-one participants underwent 748 paired serial rest or stress PET perfusion imaging in the same person on 'same day' or 'different days' using rubidium-82 (Rb-82) pharmacologic stress on 2D and two different digital 3D SiPM PET-CT scanners for global myocardial perfusion in millilitres per minute per gram. For methodological variability of 66 'same-day' serial paired PETs in the same person by 2D and two different 3D SiPM PET-CT scanners, rest-stress global myocardial millilitres per minute per gram had no significant bias (<i>P</i> = 0.464, mean difference 0.014 ± 0.21 mL/min/g) with coefficient of variation (COV) of ±14%. For methodological plus biological variability of 154 'different-day' serial paired PETs, rest-stress global perfusion had no significant bias (<i>P</i> = 0.136), mean difference (0.028 ± 0.33), and COV of ±20%. Coronary flow reserve had a small bias of 0.095 ± 0.57 (<i>P</i> = 0.041) and COV of ±20%. Coronary flow capacity was not different by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (<i>P</i> = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For quantifying myocardial perfusion in the same person on 'same day' or 'different days' using Rb-82, 3D SiPM PET-CT is comparably reproducible to analogue 2D PET-CT with the HeartSee perfusion model as the basis for quantifying physiologic severity of coronary heart disease to guide clinical decision-making or randomized clinical trials confirming these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":"2 3","pages":"qyae115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of quantitative myocardial perfusion and coronary flow capacity by positron emission tomography: 3D digital silicon photomultiplier solid state vs. legacy 2D analogue systems for clinical practice and trials.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Roby, Lindsey Harmon, Kelly Sander, Linh Bui, Danai Kitkungvan, Monica Patel, Jagat Narula, Nils P Johnson, K Lance Gould\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Quantitative rest-stress myocardial perfusion in millilitres per minute per gram among multiple 2D and 3D positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanners is essential for personalized cardiac management and clinical trials. Accordingly, this study reports the accuracy and precision of quantitative rest-stress millilitres per minute per gram and coronary flow capacity among 2D and two different digital 3D silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) PET-CT scanners for quantifying the severity of coronary pathophysiology for clinical trials or guiding interventions vs. medical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>One hundred seventy-one participants underwent 748 paired serial rest or stress PET perfusion imaging in the same person on 'same day' or 'different days' using rubidium-82 (Rb-82) pharmacologic stress on 2D and two different digital 3D SiPM PET-CT scanners for global myocardial perfusion in millilitres per minute per gram. For methodological variability of 66 'same-day' serial paired PETs in the same person by 2D and two different 3D SiPM PET-CT scanners, rest-stress global myocardial millilitres per minute per gram had no significant bias (<i>P</i> = 0.464, mean difference 0.014 ± 0.21 mL/min/g) with coefficient of variation (COV) of ±14%. For methodological plus biological variability of 154 'different-day' serial paired PETs, rest-stress global perfusion had no significant bias (<i>P</i> = 0.136), mean difference (0.028 ± 0.33), and COV of ±20%. Coronary flow reserve had a small bias of 0.095 ± 0.57 (<i>P</i> = 0.041) and COV of ±20%. Coronary flow capacity was not different by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (<i>P</i> = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For quantifying myocardial perfusion in the same person on 'same day' or 'different days' using Rb-82, 3D SiPM PET-CT is comparably reproducible to analogue 2D PET-CT with the HeartSee perfusion model as the basis for quantifying physiologic severity of coronary heart disease to guide clinical decision-making or randomized clinical trials confirming these outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"qyae115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651154/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reproducibility of quantitative myocardial perfusion and coronary flow capacity by positron emission tomography: 3D digital silicon photomultiplier solid state vs. legacy 2D analogue systems for clinical practice and trials.
Aims: Quantitative rest-stress myocardial perfusion in millilitres per minute per gram among multiple 2D and 3D positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanners is essential for personalized cardiac management and clinical trials. Accordingly, this study reports the accuracy and precision of quantitative rest-stress millilitres per minute per gram and coronary flow capacity among 2D and two different digital 3D silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) PET-CT scanners for quantifying the severity of coronary pathophysiology for clinical trials or guiding interventions vs. medical treatment.
Methods and results: One hundred seventy-one participants underwent 748 paired serial rest or stress PET perfusion imaging in the same person on 'same day' or 'different days' using rubidium-82 (Rb-82) pharmacologic stress on 2D and two different digital 3D SiPM PET-CT scanners for global myocardial perfusion in millilitres per minute per gram. For methodological variability of 66 'same-day' serial paired PETs in the same person by 2D and two different 3D SiPM PET-CT scanners, rest-stress global myocardial millilitres per minute per gram had no significant bias (P = 0.464, mean difference 0.014 ± 0.21 mL/min/g) with coefficient of variation (COV) of ±14%. For methodological plus biological variability of 154 'different-day' serial paired PETs, rest-stress global perfusion had no significant bias (P = 0.136), mean difference (0.028 ± 0.33), and COV of ±20%. Coronary flow reserve had a small bias of 0.095 ± 0.57 (P = 0.041) and COV of ±20%. Coronary flow capacity was not different by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (P = 0.99).
Conclusion: For quantifying myocardial perfusion in the same person on 'same day' or 'different days' using Rb-82, 3D SiPM PET-CT is comparably reproducible to analogue 2D PET-CT with the HeartSee perfusion model as the basis for quantifying physiologic severity of coronary heart disease to guide clinical decision-making or randomized clinical trials confirming these outcomes.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
