LTP致敏引起的桃子过敏的临床和致敏特征。

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY
Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2024.1477364
Zambrano Ibarra Gabriela, Rodríguez Mazariego M Elena, López Tovar Carlos, Blanco López Marta, Baeza Ochoa M Luisa
{"title":"LTP致敏引起的桃子过敏的临床和致敏特征。","authors":"Zambrano Ibarra Gabriela, Rodríguez Mazariego M Elena, López Tovar Carlos, Blanco López Marta, Baeza Ochoa M Luisa","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2024.1477364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are associated with a wide range of severity of allergic reactions. However, the risk factors associated with this severity are not fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the clinical characteristics of peach-allergic patients due to LTP sensitization and analyze the relationship between the severity of the reactions and patients' sensitization profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of peach-allergic patients was performed. Patients were classified into LTP-monoallergic (only peach allergy) or LTP-Syndrome (peach allergy and allergy to other plants-foods related with LTP). Symptoms with Rosaceae family and other related plant foods, skin prick tests (SPTs), and IgE values were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients were included, 46.5% suffering from anaphylaxis, 32.3% from urticaria angioedema, and 21.2% from oral allergy syndrome. Six had monoallergy to LTP and 65 LTP syndrome. Clinical severity showed no differences according to peach SPT wheal size or <i>Pru p 3</i> IgE levels. We also found no differences between the components of LTP-containing foods analyzed, the number of LTPs recognized, and the severity of symptoms. However, anaphylaxis was more frequent in patients with concomitant allergies to ≥3 groups of plant foods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LTP syndrome was the most common presentation in patients with Rosaceae food allergy. The severity of the reactions was not related to peach SPT wheal size or sIgE levels to Pru p 3, but concomitant allergies to ≥3 plant food groups could be a good marker of severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":"5 ","pages":"1477364"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and sensitization profile in peach allergy due to LTP sensitization.\",\"authors\":\"Zambrano Ibarra Gabriela, Rodríguez Mazariego M Elena, López Tovar Carlos, Blanco López Marta, Baeza Ochoa M Luisa\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/falgy.2024.1477364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are associated with a wide range of severity of allergic reactions. However, the risk factors associated with this severity are not fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the clinical characteristics of peach-allergic patients due to LTP sensitization and analyze the relationship between the severity of the reactions and patients' sensitization profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of peach-allergic patients was performed. Patients were classified into LTP-monoallergic (only peach allergy) or LTP-Syndrome (peach allergy and allergy to other plants-foods related with LTP). Symptoms with Rosaceae family and other related plant foods, skin prick tests (SPTs), and IgE values were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients were included, 46.5% suffering from anaphylaxis, 32.3% from urticaria angioedema, and 21.2% from oral allergy syndrome. Six had monoallergy to LTP and 65 LTP syndrome. Clinical severity showed no differences according to peach SPT wheal size or <i>Pru p 3</i> IgE levels. We also found no differences between the components of LTP-containing foods analyzed, the number of LTPs recognized, and the severity of symptoms. However, anaphylaxis was more frequent in patients with concomitant allergies to ≥3 groups of plant foods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LTP syndrome was the most common presentation in patients with Rosaceae food allergy. The severity of the reactions was not related to peach SPT wheal size or sIgE levels to Pru p 3, but concomitant allergies to ≥3 plant food groups could be a good marker of severity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1477364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2024.1477364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2024.1477364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脂质转移蛋白(LTP)与多种严重程度的过敏反应有关。然而,与这种严重程度相关的风险因素尚未完全了解。目的:描述LTP致敏性桃子过敏患者的临床特点,分析反应严重程度与患者致敏性的关系。方法:对桃子过敏患者进行回顾性研究。将患者分为LTP单过敏(仅对桃子过敏)和LTP综合征(对桃子过敏并对与LTP相关的其他植物性食物过敏)。记录蔷薇科和其他相关植物性食物的症状、皮肤点刺试验(SPTs)和IgE值。结果:纳入71例患者,其中过敏性反应46.5%,荨麻疹血管性水肿32.3%,口腔过敏综合征21.2%。6例为LTP单过敏,65例为LTP综合征。临床严重程度无差异,根据桃子SPT轮大小和Pru p3 IgE水平。我们还发现,所分析的含ltp的食物成分、所识别的ltp的数量和症状的严重程度之间没有差异。然而,同时对≥3组植物性食物过敏的患者更容易发生过敏反应。结论:LTP综合征是蔷薇科食物过敏患者最常见的表现。反应的严重程度与桃子SPT轮大小或sIgE水平与Pru p3无关,但同时对≥3种植物性食物过敏可能是严重程度的良好标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and sensitization profile in peach allergy due to LTP sensitization.

Background: Lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are associated with a wide range of severity of allergic reactions. However, the risk factors associated with this severity are not fully understood.

Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics of peach-allergic patients due to LTP sensitization and analyze the relationship between the severity of the reactions and patients' sensitization profiles.

Methods: A retrospective study of peach-allergic patients was performed. Patients were classified into LTP-monoallergic (only peach allergy) or LTP-Syndrome (peach allergy and allergy to other plants-foods related with LTP). Symptoms with Rosaceae family and other related plant foods, skin prick tests (SPTs), and IgE values were recorded.

Results: Seventy-one patients were included, 46.5% suffering from anaphylaxis, 32.3% from urticaria angioedema, and 21.2% from oral allergy syndrome. Six had monoallergy to LTP and 65 LTP syndrome. Clinical severity showed no differences according to peach SPT wheal size or Pru p 3 IgE levels. We also found no differences between the components of LTP-containing foods analyzed, the number of LTPs recognized, and the severity of symptoms. However, anaphylaxis was more frequent in patients with concomitant allergies to ≥3 groups of plant foods.

Conclusions: LTP syndrome was the most common presentation in patients with Rosaceae food allergy. The severity of the reactions was not related to peach SPT wheal size or sIgE levels to Pru p 3, but concomitant allergies to ≥3 plant food groups could be a good marker of severity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信