Dorathy Tamayo-Murillo , Jake T. Weeks , Cody A. Keller , Michael Andre , Celene Gonzalez , Andrew Li , Eduardo Grunvald , Joy Liau , Sedighe Hosseini Shabanan , Tanya Wolfson , Jingyi Zuo , Adam Robinson , Carolina Amador Carrascal , Nevada Sanchez , Scott B. Reeder , Aiguo Han , Claude B. Sirlin
{"title":"手持式即时超声定量肝脂肪评估:成人技术实施和试点研究。","authors":"Dorathy Tamayo-Murillo , Jake T. Weeks , Cody A. Keller , Michael Andre , Celene Gonzalez , Andrew Li , Eduardo Grunvald , Joy Liau , Sedighe Hosseini Shabanan , Tanya Wolfson , Jingyi Zuo , Adam Robinson , Carolina Amador Carrascal , Nevada Sanchez , Scott B. Reeder , Aiguo Han , Claude B. Sirlin","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To implement, examine the feasibility of, and evaluate the performance of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) with a handheld point-of-care US (POCUS) device for assessing liver fat in adults.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This prospective IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant pilot study enrolled adults with overweight or obesity. Participants underwent chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging to estimate proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and, within 1 mo, QUS with a POCUS device by expert sonographers and novice operators (no prior US scanning experience). Radiofrequency data from the liver collected with the POCUS device were analyzed offline using probe-specific calibrations to estimate two QUS parameters: attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of each parameter was estimated for classifying presence/absence of hepatic steatosis (defined as PDFF ≥ 5%). Spearman rank correlation between each parameter and PDFF was estimated and its significance assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 18 participants (mean age, 43 y ± 14; 17 women), 8 had hepatic steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%). Both AC and BSC classified hepatic steatosis accurately with AUCs of 0.96–0.97 for expert and 0.88–0.89 for novice operators (<em>p</em> < 0.01 for all) and correlated significantly with PDFF with rho's of 0.65–0.69 for expert and 0.58–0.65 for novice operators (<em>p</em> < 0.02 for all).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>QUS can be implemented on a POCUS device and can be performed by expert or novice operators after limited training in adults with overweight or obesity with promising initial results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 3","pages":"Pages 475-483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Liver Fat Assessment by Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Technical Implementation and Pilot Study in Adults\",\"authors\":\"Dorathy Tamayo-Murillo , Jake T. Weeks , Cody A. Keller , Michael Andre , Celene Gonzalez , Andrew Li , Eduardo Grunvald , Joy Liau , Sedighe Hosseini Shabanan , Tanya Wolfson , Jingyi Zuo , Adam Robinson , Carolina Amador Carrascal , Nevada Sanchez , Scott B. Reeder , Aiguo Han , Claude B. Sirlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To implement, examine the feasibility of, and evaluate the performance of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) with a handheld point-of-care US (POCUS) device for assessing liver fat in adults.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This prospective IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant pilot study enrolled adults with overweight or obesity. Participants underwent chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging to estimate proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and, within 1 mo, QUS with a POCUS device by expert sonographers and novice operators (no prior US scanning experience). Radiofrequency data from the liver collected with the POCUS device were analyzed offline using probe-specific calibrations to estimate two QUS parameters: attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of each parameter was estimated for classifying presence/absence of hepatic steatosis (defined as PDFF ≥ 5%). Spearman rank correlation between each parameter and PDFF was estimated and its significance assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 18 participants (mean age, 43 y ± 14; 17 women), 8 had hepatic steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%). Both AC and BSC classified hepatic steatosis accurately with AUCs of 0.96–0.97 for expert and 0.88–0.89 for novice operators (<em>p</em> < 0.01 for all) and correlated significantly with PDFF with rho's of 0.65–0.69 for expert and 0.58–0.65 for novice operators (<em>p</em> < 0.02 for all).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>QUS can be implemented on a POCUS device and can be performed by expert or novice operators after limited training in adults with overweight or obesity with promising initial results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 475-483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924004265\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924004265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantitative Liver Fat Assessment by Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Technical Implementation and Pilot Study in Adults
Objectives
To implement, examine the feasibility of, and evaluate the performance of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) with a handheld point-of-care US (POCUS) device for assessing liver fat in adults.
Materials and Methods
This prospective IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant pilot study enrolled adults with overweight or obesity. Participants underwent chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging to estimate proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and, within 1 mo, QUS with a POCUS device by expert sonographers and novice operators (no prior US scanning experience). Radiofrequency data from the liver collected with the POCUS device were analyzed offline using probe-specific calibrations to estimate two QUS parameters: attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of each parameter was estimated for classifying presence/absence of hepatic steatosis (defined as PDFF ≥ 5%). Spearman rank correlation between each parameter and PDFF was estimated and its significance assessed.
Results
Of 18 participants (mean age, 43 y ± 14; 17 women), 8 had hepatic steatosis (PDFF ≥ 5%). Both AC and BSC classified hepatic steatosis accurately with AUCs of 0.96–0.97 for expert and 0.88–0.89 for novice operators (p < 0.01 for all) and correlated significantly with PDFF with rho's of 0.65–0.69 for expert and 0.58–0.65 for novice operators (p < 0.02 for all).
Conclusion
QUS can be implemented on a POCUS device and can be performed by expert or novice operators after limited training in adults with overweight or obesity with promising initial results.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.