助听器验证:南非听力学家的实践和看法。

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jared Moll, Zani Burger, Daneel M P Jacobs, Retshepisitswe P Mothibe, De Wet Swanepoel, Faheema Mahomed-Asmail
{"title":"助听器验证:南非听力学家的实践和看法。","authors":"Jared Moll, Zani Burger, Daneel M P Jacobs, Retshepisitswe P Mothibe, De Wet Swanepoel, Faheema Mahomed-Asmail","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v71i1.1059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Hearing aid verification is required to objectively measure hearing aid outputs by ensuring that the amplified speech spectrum closely approximates the prescription goals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study aimed to determine audiologists' perceptions and practices regarding hearing aid verification and identify facilitators and barriers to its use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> A cross-sectional national e-survey included questions related to demographics, perceptions of verification, verification practices and two open-ended questions regarding the facilitators and barriers to conducting hearing aid verification in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Seventy-eight South African audiologists, with experience ranging from less than a year to 34 years, completed the online survey. Of these, 76.3% conduct hearing aid verification, while 23.7% seldom or never perform this verification. Among the audiologists who conducted verification, 81.0% reported performing it on both adults and children. More than three-quarters (86.6%) indicated that they conduct verification only during the initial fitting, while half (53.8%) do so only when a problem arises. Thematic analysis revealed the following barriers to verification: improper equipment, a lack of equipment, non-standard clinical practices and time constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There are several challenges faced by South African audiologists in performing verification. It may be feasible to address these barriers by raising awareness about the value of verification, offering training, and advocating for the purchase and utilisation of verification equipment.Contribution: This study's findings provide information on the current practices of hearing aid verification in a socioeconomically diverse setting. Furthermore, it highlights important challenges such as a lack of equipment as well as time constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":44003,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","volume":"71 1","pages":"e1-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hearing aid verification: Practices and perceptions of South African audiologists.\",\"authors\":\"Jared Moll, Zani Burger, Daneel M P Jacobs, Retshepisitswe P Mothibe, De Wet Swanepoel, Faheema Mahomed-Asmail\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajcd.v71i1.1059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Hearing aid verification is required to objectively measure hearing aid outputs by ensuring that the amplified speech spectrum closely approximates the prescription goals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This study aimed to determine audiologists' perceptions and practices regarding hearing aid verification and identify facilitators and barriers to its use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> A cross-sectional national e-survey included questions related to demographics, perceptions of verification, verification practices and two open-ended questions regarding the facilitators and barriers to conducting hearing aid verification in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Seventy-eight South African audiologists, with experience ranging from less than a year to 34 years, completed the online survey. Of these, 76.3% conduct hearing aid verification, while 23.7% seldom or never perform this verification. Among the audiologists who conducted verification, 81.0% reported performing it on both adults and children. More than three-quarters (86.6%) indicated that they conduct verification only during the initial fitting, while half (53.8%) do so only when a problem arises. Thematic analysis revealed the following barriers to verification: improper equipment, a lack of equipment, non-standard clinical practices and time constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There are several challenges faced by South African audiologists in performing verification. It may be feasible to address these barriers by raising awareness about the value of verification, offering training, and advocating for the purchase and utilisation of verification equipment.Contribution: This study's findings provide information on the current practices of hearing aid verification in a socioeconomically diverse setting. Furthermore, it highlights important challenges such as a lack of equipment as well as time constraints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736548/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v71i1.1059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v71i1.1059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:助听器验证需要客观地测量助听器输出,确保放大的语音频谱与处方目标非常接近。目的:本研究旨在确定听力学家对助听器验证的看法和实践,并确定助听器使用的促进因素和障碍。方法:一项横断面全国电子调查包括与人口统计、对核查的看法、核查实践和两个关于在南非进行助听器核查的促进因素和障碍的开放式问题有关的问题。结果:78名南非听力学家完成了在线调查,他们的经验从不到一年到34年不等。其中,76.3%的人进行助听器验证,23.7%的人很少或从不进行助听器验证。在进行验证的听力学家中,81.0%的人报告对成人和儿童都进行了验证。超过四分之三(86.6%)的人表示他们只在初始拟合时进行验证,而一半(53.8%)的人只在出现问题时进行验证。专题分析揭示了以下核查障碍:设备不当、设备缺乏、临床实践不规范和时间限制。结论:南非听力学家在进行验证时面临着一些挑战。通过提高对核查价值的认识、提供培训和提倡购买和利用核查设备来解决这些障碍可能是可行的。贡献:本研究的发现提供了当前社会经济多样化背景下助听器验证实践的信息。此外,它还突出了一些重要的挑战,如缺乏设备和时间限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hearing aid verification: Practices and perceptions of South African audiologists.

Background:  Hearing aid verification is required to objectively measure hearing aid outputs by ensuring that the amplified speech spectrum closely approximates the prescription goals.

Objectives:  This study aimed to determine audiologists' perceptions and practices regarding hearing aid verification and identify facilitators and barriers to its use.

Method:  A cross-sectional national e-survey included questions related to demographics, perceptions of verification, verification practices and two open-ended questions regarding the facilitators and barriers to conducting hearing aid verification in South Africa.

Results:  Seventy-eight South African audiologists, with experience ranging from less than a year to 34 years, completed the online survey. Of these, 76.3% conduct hearing aid verification, while 23.7% seldom or never perform this verification. Among the audiologists who conducted verification, 81.0% reported performing it on both adults and children. More than three-quarters (86.6%) indicated that they conduct verification only during the initial fitting, while half (53.8%) do so only when a problem arises. Thematic analysis revealed the following barriers to verification: improper equipment, a lack of equipment, non-standard clinical practices and time constraints.

Conclusion:  There are several challenges faced by South African audiologists in performing verification. It may be feasible to address these barriers by raising awareness about the value of verification, offering training, and advocating for the purchase and utilisation of verification equipment.Contribution: This study's findings provide information on the current practices of hearing aid verification in a socioeconomically diverse setting. Furthermore, it highlights important challenges such as a lack of equipment as well as time constraints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信