Mbali P Dube, Charles Byaruhanga, Pierre Dorny, Veronique Dermauw, Daniel N Qekwana
{"title":"南非低吞吐量屠宰场屠宰牛的牛带绦虫流行率。","authors":"Mbali P Dube, Charles Byaruhanga, Pierre Dorny, Veronique Dermauw, Daniel N Qekwana","doi":"10.4102/ojvr.v91i1.2157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meat inspection is the routine method used to identify cattle infected with Taenia saginata; however, the sensitivity of this method is low. We investigated the prevalence of T. saginata infection in cattle slaughtered in low throughput abattoirs (LTs) in Gauteng province, South Africa, based on meat inspection and serology. A total of 188 cattle carcasses from three abattoirs underwent meat inspection for the presence of T. saginata cysticerci, while serum was tested for the occurrence of antigens using antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Ag-ELISA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-sequencing was performed to confirm T. saginata cysts identified during enhanced inspection and incision of 10 randomly selected hearts. Apparent and true prevalence were calculated, and a logistic regression model was fit to evaluate associations between abattoir, sex, animal origin, age and T. saginata serological status. Out of the 188 carcasses, no positive cases (0%) were identified during routine meat inspection, yet three cysticerci-like lesions were identified from three hearts following additional incisions, of which one was confirmed as T. saginata. Fifty-four of the sampled cattle carcasses tested positive using Ag-ELISA (apparent and true prevalence: 29.0%, 71.8%). Feedlot cattle were less likely (odds ratios [OR]: 0.33, p = 0.043) to have a positive serological test result for T. saginata compared to non-feedlot cattle, and the odds of a positive result differed between abattoirs (p 0.05).Contribution: Our results confirmed the low sensitivity of routine meat inspection in LTs, which may pose a public health risk, and therefore other diagnostic methods need to be included in the surveillance system for T. saginata.</p>","PeriodicalId":54685,"journal":{"name":"Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research","volume":"91 1","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taenia saginata prevalence in cattle slaughtered at low throughput abattoirs in South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Mbali P Dube, Charles Byaruhanga, Pierre Dorny, Veronique Dermauw, Daniel N Qekwana\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ojvr.v91i1.2157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Meat inspection is the routine method used to identify cattle infected with Taenia saginata; however, the sensitivity of this method is low. We investigated the prevalence of T. saginata infection in cattle slaughtered in low throughput abattoirs (LTs) in Gauteng province, South Africa, based on meat inspection and serology. A total of 188 cattle carcasses from three abattoirs underwent meat inspection for the presence of T. saginata cysticerci, while serum was tested for the occurrence of antigens using antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Ag-ELISA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-sequencing was performed to confirm T. saginata cysts identified during enhanced inspection and incision of 10 randomly selected hearts. Apparent and true prevalence were calculated, and a logistic regression model was fit to evaluate associations between abattoir, sex, animal origin, age and T. saginata serological status. Out of the 188 carcasses, no positive cases (0%) were identified during routine meat inspection, yet three cysticerci-like lesions were identified from three hearts following additional incisions, of which one was confirmed as T. saginata. Fifty-four of the sampled cattle carcasses tested positive using Ag-ELISA (apparent and true prevalence: 29.0%, 71.8%). Feedlot cattle were less likely (odds ratios [OR]: 0.33, p = 0.043) to have a positive serological test result for T. saginata compared to non-feedlot cattle, and the odds of a positive result differed between abattoirs (p 0.05).Contribution: Our results confirmed the low sensitivity of routine meat inspection in LTs, which may pose a public health risk, and therefore other diagnostic methods need to be included in the surveillance system for T. saginata.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v91i1.2157\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v91i1.2157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肉品检验是鉴定牛带绦虫感染的常规方法;但该方法的灵敏度较低。基于肉品检验和血清学,我们调查了南非豪登省低吞吐量屠宰场(LTs)屠宰的牛中saginata感染的流行情况。对来自三个屠宰场的188具牛尸体进行了肉类检查,以确定是否存在saginata囊虫,同时使用抗原酶联免疫吸附试验(Ag-ELISA)检测血清中是否存在抗原。采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)测序方法对随机选取的10颗心脏进行强化检查和切开时发现的saginata囊肿进行确证。计算表观流行率和真实流行率,并拟合logistic回归模型,评估屠宰场、性别、动物来源、年龄与猪形绦虫血清学状态之间的关系。在188具尸体中,在常规肉类检查中未发现阳性病例(0%),但在另外切口后的三个心脏中发现了三个囊虫样病变,其中一个被确认为saginata。采用Ag-ELISA检测,54具牛尸体呈阳性(表观和真实患病率分别为29.0%和71.8%)。与非饲养场的牛相比,饲养场的牛较不可能(比值比[OR]: 0.33, p = 0.043)出现弓形虫血清学检测阳性结果,而屠宰场之间出现弓形虫血清学检测阳性结果的几率也存在差异(p 0.05)。贡献:我们的研究结果证实了LTs常规肉类检查的低灵敏度,这可能构成公共卫生风险,因此需要将其他诊断方法纳入saginata监测系统。
Taenia saginata prevalence in cattle slaughtered at low throughput abattoirs in South Africa.
Meat inspection is the routine method used to identify cattle infected with Taenia saginata; however, the sensitivity of this method is low. We investigated the prevalence of T. saginata infection in cattle slaughtered in low throughput abattoirs (LTs) in Gauteng province, South Africa, based on meat inspection and serology. A total of 188 cattle carcasses from three abattoirs underwent meat inspection for the presence of T. saginata cysticerci, while serum was tested for the occurrence of antigens using antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Ag-ELISA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-sequencing was performed to confirm T. saginata cysts identified during enhanced inspection and incision of 10 randomly selected hearts. Apparent and true prevalence were calculated, and a logistic regression model was fit to evaluate associations between abattoir, sex, animal origin, age and T. saginata serological status. Out of the 188 carcasses, no positive cases (0%) were identified during routine meat inspection, yet three cysticerci-like lesions were identified from three hearts following additional incisions, of which one was confirmed as T. saginata. Fifty-four of the sampled cattle carcasses tested positive using Ag-ELISA (apparent and true prevalence: 29.0%, 71.8%). Feedlot cattle were less likely (odds ratios [OR]: 0.33, p = 0.043) to have a positive serological test result for T. saginata compared to non-feedlot cattle, and the odds of a positive result differed between abattoirs (p 0.05).Contribution: Our results confirmed the low sensitivity of routine meat inspection in LTs, which may pose a public health risk, and therefore other diagnostic methods need to be included in the surveillance system for T. saginata.
期刊介绍:
The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, is the official publication of the Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute. While it considers submissions from any geographic region, its focus is on Africa and the infectious and parasitic diseases and disease vectors that affect livestock and wildlife on the continent.