经桡动脉通路的幼儿选择性冠状动脉造影。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Yasuto Maeda, Tadashi Inoue, Yoshiyuki Kagiyama, Ryuta Takase, Yusuke Koteda, Kenji Suda
{"title":"经桡动脉通路的幼儿选择性冠状动脉造影。","authors":"Yasuto Maeda, Tadashi Inoue, Yoshiyuki Kagiyama, Ryuta Takase, Yusuke Koteda, Kenji Suda","doi":"10.1111/ped.15841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transradial access (TRA) is not a common vascular access in children. We have been performing TRA actively to reduce puncture complications, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of TRA in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 29 patients aged 5-12 years who underwent diagnostic catheterization at Kurume University Hospital. Vascular access was placed through TRA in 11 of these patients and through transfemoral access (TFA) in 18 patients with comparable ages. We compared TRA with TFA using various demographic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of TRA was 10 years (5-12 years) and that of TFA was 7 years (5-11 years). They were not significantly different. Transradial access showed an acceptably high success rate (91%), which was comparable with that of TFA (100%), although we had to switch to TFA in one patient in which the radial artery diameter was too small to puncture and due to failure of appropriate sedation and local anesthesia. A comparison between the two groups showed no significant differences in weight, puncture success rate, total time to completion of both arterial and venous puncture, or fluoroscopy time. However, none of the patients with TRA required post-catheter bed rest after removal of the arterial sheath, whereas patients with TFA required 6 h of bed rest. Although there were no puncture complications in group TRA, one patient with TFA had a subcutaneous hematoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transradial access can be performed safely in young children and may be more beneficial than TFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":20039,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics International","volume":"66 1","pages":"e15841"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective coronary arteriography via transradial access in young children.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuto Maeda, Tadashi Inoue, Yoshiyuki Kagiyama, Ryuta Takase, Yusuke Koteda, Kenji Suda\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ped.15841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transradial access (TRA) is not a common vascular access in children. We have been performing TRA actively to reduce puncture complications, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of TRA in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 29 patients aged 5-12 years who underwent diagnostic catheterization at Kurume University Hospital. Vascular access was placed through TRA in 11 of these patients and through transfemoral access (TFA) in 18 patients with comparable ages. We compared TRA with TFA using various demographic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of TRA was 10 years (5-12 years) and that of TFA was 7 years (5-11 years). They were not significantly different. Transradial access showed an acceptably high success rate (91%), which was comparable with that of TFA (100%), although we had to switch to TFA in one patient in which the radial artery diameter was too small to puncture and due to failure of appropriate sedation and local anesthesia. A comparison between the two groups showed no significant differences in weight, puncture success rate, total time to completion of both arterial and venous puncture, or fluoroscopy time. However, none of the patients with TRA required post-catheter bed rest after removal of the arterial sheath, whereas patients with TFA required 6 h of bed rest. Although there were no puncture complications in group TRA, one patient with TFA had a subcutaneous hematoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transradial access can be performed safely in young children and may be more beneficial than TFA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics International\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"e15841\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.15841\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.15841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经桡动脉通路(TRA)在儿童中不是常见的血管通路。我们一直在积极进行TRA以减少穿刺并发症,本研究的目的是探讨TRA在幼儿中的安全性和有效性。方法:本研究纳入29例5-12岁在库鲁姆大学医院行诊断性导尿术的患者。其中11例患者通过TRA进行血管通路,18例年龄相当的患者通过经股通道(TFA)进行血管通路。我们使用各种人口统计数据比较TRA和TFA。结果:TRA患者中位年龄为10岁(5 ~ 12岁),TFA患者中位年龄为7岁(5 ~ 11岁)。它们没有显著差异。经桡动脉通路显示出可接受的高成功率(91%),与TFA(100%)相当,尽管我们不得不在一名桡动脉直径太小而无法穿刺且由于适当的镇静和局部麻醉失败的患者中切换到TFA。两组患者在体重、穿刺成功率、完成动脉和静脉穿刺总时间、透视时间等方面均无显著差异。然而,没有一例TRA患者在去除动脉鞘后需要导管后卧床休息,而TFA患者需要6小时的卧床休息。尽管TRA组无穿刺并发症,但有1例TFA患者出现皮下血肿。结论:经桡动脉入路在幼儿中是安全的,可能比TFA更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selective coronary arteriography via transradial access in young children.

Background: Transradial access (TRA) is not a common vascular access in children. We have been performing TRA actively to reduce puncture complications, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of TRA in young children.

Methods: The study included 29 patients aged 5-12 years who underwent diagnostic catheterization at Kurume University Hospital. Vascular access was placed through TRA in 11 of these patients and through transfemoral access (TFA) in 18 patients with comparable ages. We compared TRA with TFA using various demographic data.

Results: The median age of TRA was 10 years (5-12 years) and that of TFA was 7 years (5-11 years). They were not significantly different. Transradial access showed an acceptably high success rate (91%), which was comparable with that of TFA (100%), although we had to switch to TFA in one patient in which the radial artery diameter was too small to puncture and due to failure of appropriate sedation and local anesthesia. A comparison between the two groups showed no significant differences in weight, puncture success rate, total time to completion of both arterial and venous puncture, or fluoroscopy time. However, none of the patients with TRA required post-catheter bed rest after removal of the arterial sheath, whereas patients with TFA required 6 h of bed rest. Although there were no puncture complications in group TRA, one patient with TFA had a subcutaneous hematoma.

Conclusion: Transradial access can be performed safely in young children and may be more beneficial than TFA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics International
Pediatrics International 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
519
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Publishing articles of scientific excellence in pediatrics and child health delivery, Pediatrics International aims to encourage those involved in the research, practice and delivery of child health to share their experiences, ideas and achievements. Formerly Acta Paediatrica Japonica, the change in name in 1999 to Pediatrics International, reflects the Journal''s international status both in readership and contributions (approximately 45% of articles published are from non-Japanese authors). The Editors continue their strong commitment to the sharing of scientific information for the benefit of children everywhere. Pediatrics International opens the door to all authors throughout the world. Manuscripts are judged by two experts solely upon the basis of their contribution of original data, original ideas and their presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信