Aidin Abedi, Luis Morales Ojeda, Stefania Montero, Nhi Ha, Priya Kohli, Petr Gaburak, Armita Abedi, David Chapman, Evgeniy Kreydin, David A Ginsberg
{"title":"治疗不足的脊髓损伤患者尿路重建后的长期决策后悔及相关因素。","authors":"Aidin Abedi, Luis Morales Ojeda, Stefania Montero, Nhi Ha, Priya Kohli, Petr Gaburak, Armita Abedi, David Chapman, Evgeniy Kreydin, David A Ginsberg","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with refractory neurogenic bladder dysfunction may require urinary reconstruction due to severe incontinence, difficulty with catheterization, and to prevent upper urinary tract compromise. We evaluated long-term decisional regret and associated factors after urinary reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We interviewed patients with spinal cord injuries who underwent bladder reconstruction surgery at least 10 years ago, administering validated surveys on bowel quality of life (QoL) and dysfunction, UTIs, and decisional regret. Daily bladder management and symptoms were assessed using the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score, a validated questionnaire consisting of 3 domains that examine incontinence, storage and voiding, and other health and QoL consequences of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical modality were collected through chart reviews. Decisional regret was compared among subgroups and correlated with patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 52 patients (41 men, 78.8%; mean age 54.9 ± 10 years) with average follow-up of 30 ± 8.6 years of postinjury and 21.9 ± 5.3 years of postsurgery. Reconstruction procedures mostly included bladder augmentation (n = 38, 73.1%) and augmentation with continent catheterizable stoma (n = 9, 17.3%). Most of the patients were of Hispanic origin (n = 41, 78.8%) with complete spinal cord injuries (n = 39, 76%). The median decision regret score was 7.5 (IQR: 0-25), indicating low regret among most participants. Bladder irrigation frequency (<i>P</i> = .002) was associated with decision regret, while other patient and surgical factors (eg, demographics, UTI frequency, and surgery type) were not. Surgical regret was moderately correlated with diminished bowel-related QoL (<i>ρ</i> = 0.333, <i>P</i> = .016) and increased Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (<i>ρ</i> = 0.328, <i>P</i> = .018). The Incontinence (<i>ρ</i> = 0.286, <i>P</i> = .040) and Consequences (<i>ρ</i> = 0.299, <i>P</i> = .031) domains of this measure showed weak statistically significant correlations with regret, while the Storage and Voiding domain did not reach significance (<i>ρ</i> = 0.245, <i>P</i> = .080).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term follow-up suggests that lower urinary tract reconstruction with bowel interposition is a well-accepted and durable approach for managing refractory neurogenic bladder. Factors associated with decision regret, such as need for irrigation, should be incorporated in patient-centered decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"617-627"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Decision Regret and Associated Factors After Urinary Reconstruction in Underserved Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Aidin Abedi, Luis Morales Ojeda, Stefania Montero, Nhi Ha, Priya Kohli, Petr Gaburak, Armita Abedi, David Chapman, Evgeniy Kreydin, David A Ginsberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with refractory neurogenic bladder dysfunction may require urinary reconstruction due to severe incontinence, difficulty with catheterization, and to prevent upper urinary tract compromise. We evaluated long-term decisional regret and associated factors after urinary reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We interviewed patients with spinal cord injuries who underwent bladder reconstruction surgery at least 10 years ago, administering validated surveys on bowel quality of life (QoL) and dysfunction, UTIs, and decisional regret. Daily bladder management and symptoms were assessed using the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score, a validated questionnaire consisting of 3 domains that examine incontinence, storage and voiding, and other health and QoL consequences of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical modality were collected through chart reviews. Decisional regret was compared among subgroups and correlated with patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 52 patients (41 men, 78.8%; mean age 54.9 ± 10 years) with average follow-up of 30 ± 8.6 years of postinjury and 21.9 ± 5.3 years of postsurgery. Reconstruction procedures mostly included bladder augmentation (n = 38, 73.1%) and augmentation with continent catheterizable stoma (n = 9, 17.3%). Most of the patients were of Hispanic origin (n = 41, 78.8%) with complete spinal cord injuries (n = 39, 76%). The median decision regret score was 7.5 (IQR: 0-25), indicating low regret among most participants. Bladder irrigation frequency (<i>P</i> = .002) was associated with decision regret, while other patient and surgical factors (eg, demographics, UTI frequency, and surgery type) were not. Surgical regret was moderately correlated with diminished bowel-related QoL (<i>ρ</i> = 0.333, <i>P</i> = .016) and increased Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (<i>ρ</i> = 0.328, <i>P</i> = .018). The Incontinence (<i>ρ</i> = 0.286, <i>P</i> = .040) and Consequences (<i>ρ</i> = 0.299, <i>P</i> = .031) domains of this measure showed weak statistically significant correlations with regret, while the Storage and Voiding domain did not reach significance (<i>ρ</i> = 0.245, <i>P</i> = .080).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term follow-up suggests that lower urinary tract reconstruction with bowel interposition is a well-accepted and durable approach for managing refractory neurogenic bladder. Factors associated with decision regret, such as need for irrigation, should be incorporated in patient-centered decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"617-627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004392\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Decision Regret and Associated Factors After Urinary Reconstruction in Underserved Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.
Purpose: Patients with refractory neurogenic bladder dysfunction may require urinary reconstruction due to severe incontinence, difficulty with catheterization, and to prevent upper urinary tract compromise. We evaluated long-term decisional regret and associated factors after urinary reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury.
Materials and methods: We interviewed patients with spinal cord injuries who underwent bladder reconstruction surgery at least 10 years ago, administering validated surveys on bowel quality of life (QoL) and dysfunction, UTIs, and decisional regret. Daily bladder management and symptoms were assessed using the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score, a validated questionnaire consisting of 3 domains that examine incontinence, storage and voiding, and other health and QoL consequences of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical modality were collected through chart reviews. Decisional regret was compared among subgroups and correlated with patient-reported outcomes.
Results: We evaluated 52 patients (41 men, 78.8%; mean age 54.9 ± 10 years) with average follow-up of 30 ± 8.6 years of postinjury and 21.9 ± 5.3 years of postsurgery. Reconstruction procedures mostly included bladder augmentation (n = 38, 73.1%) and augmentation with continent catheterizable stoma (n = 9, 17.3%). Most of the patients were of Hispanic origin (n = 41, 78.8%) with complete spinal cord injuries (n = 39, 76%). The median decision regret score was 7.5 (IQR: 0-25), indicating low regret among most participants. Bladder irrigation frequency (P = .002) was associated with decision regret, while other patient and surgical factors (eg, demographics, UTI frequency, and surgery type) were not. Surgical regret was moderately correlated with diminished bowel-related QoL (ρ = 0.333, P = .016) and increased Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (ρ = 0.328, P = .018). The Incontinence (ρ = 0.286, P = .040) and Consequences (ρ = 0.299, P = .031) domains of this measure showed weak statistically significant correlations with regret, while the Storage and Voiding domain did not reach significance (ρ = 0.245, P = .080).
Conclusions: Long-term follow-up suggests that lower urinary tract reconstruction with bowel interposition is a well-accepted and durable approach for managing refractory neurogenic bladder. Factors associated with decision regret, such as need for irrigation, should be incorporated in patient-centered decision-making.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.