Giuliano Francesco Bonura, Paolo Biancheri, Joachim Rainer, Paola Soriani, Enrique Rodriguez de Santiago, Arianna Parrella, Alice Campioli, Emmanuele Guerra, Eugenia Gualdi, Alessandro Pignatti, Mauro Manno
{"title":"脊髓麻醉用于内镜下粘膜下解剖大直肠乙状结肠病变的可行性研究。","authors":"Giuliano Francesco Bonura, Paolo Biancheri, Joachim Rainer, Paola Soriani, Enrique Rodriguez de Santiago, Arianna Parrella, Alice Campioli, Emmanuele Guerra, Eugenia Gualdi, Alessandro Pignatti, Mauro Manno","doi":"10.1055/a-2441-2543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is often challenging and time-consuming. Prolonged sedation and general anesthesia are associated with a relevant risk of anesthesia-related adverse events (ARAEs), especially in elderly and frail patients. Spinal anesthesia (SA), a simple technique providing analgesia and motor block without systemic drug administration, has never been described in gastrointestinal endoscopy. We assessed the feasibility of SA in colorectal lesion ESD. <b>Patients and methods</b> We retrospectively collected data on all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) under SA in our center during the last 3 years. We evaluated the rates of technical success, i.e. ESD completion under SA without need of conversion to deep sedation or general anesthesia, and ARAEs after SA. <b>Results</b> ESD under SA was performed on 20 rectosigmoid LSTs ≥ 35 mm. Technical success was achieved in 95.0% of cases (19/20), while one patient (5.0%) required conversion to deep sedation. Two patients (10.0%) experienced acute urinary retention that was successfully treated with temporary catheterization. <b>Conclusions</b> Our initial experience suggests that SA for ESD of large rectosigmoid LSTs is feasible, and it may prove to be a valuable option, especially for elderly and frail patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 12","pages":"E1447-E1452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651919/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal anesthesia for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large rectosigmoid lesions: Feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Giuliano Francesco Bonura, Paolo Biancheri, Joachim Rainer, Paola Soriani, Enrique Rodriguez de Santiago, Arianna Parrella, Alice Campioli, Emmanuele Guerra, Eugenia Gualdi, Alessandro Pignatti, Mauro Manno\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2441-2543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is often challenging and time-consuming. Prolonged sedation and general anesthesia are associated with a relevant risk of anesthesia-related adverse events (ARAEs), especially in elderly and frail patients. Spinal anesthesia (SA), a simple technique providing analgesia and motor block without systemic drug administration, has never been described in gastrointestinal endoscopy. We assessed the feasibility of SA in colorectal lesion ESD. <b>Patients and methods</b> We retrospectively collected data on all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) under SA in our center during the last 3 years. We evaluated the rates of technical success, i.e. ESD completion under SA without need of conversion to deep sedation or general anesthesia, and ARAEs after SA. <b>Results</b> ESD under SA was performed on 20 rectosigmoid LSTs ≥ 35 mm. Technical success was achieved in 95.0% of cases (19/20), while one patient (5.0%) required conversion to deep sedation. Two patients (10.0%) experienced acute urinary retention that was successfully treated with temporary catheterization. <b>Conclusions</b> Our initial experience suggests that SA for ESD of large rectosigmoid LSTs is feasible, and it may prove to be a valuable option, especially for elderly and frail patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 12\",\"pages\":\"E1447-E1452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651919/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2441-2543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2441-2543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和研究目的 大肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)通常具有挑战性且耗时较长。长时间的镇静和全身麻醉与麻醉相关不良事件(ARAEs)的相关风险有关,尤其是在年老体弱的患者中。脊髓麻醉(SA)是一种无需全身用药即可提供镇痛和运动阻滞的简单技术,但在消化道内窥镜检查中却从未应用过。我们评估了脊髓麻醉在结肠直肠病变ESD中的可行性。患者和方法 我们回顾性地收集了本中心在过去 3 年中在 SA 下对结肠直肠侧向播散肿瘤(LST)进行 ESD 的所有连续患者的数据。我们评估了技术成功率(即在 SA 下完成 ESD 而无需转为深度镇静或全身麻醉)和 SA 后的 ARAE。结果 在 SA 下对 20 个直肠乙状结肠 LST ≥ 35 mm 进行了 ESD。95.0%的病例(19/20)取得了技术成功,而一名患者(5.0%)需要转为深度镇静。两名患者(10.0%)出现急性尿潴留,经临时导尿成功治疗。结论 我们的初步经验表明,用 SA 进行大直肠乙状结肠 LST 的 ESD 是可行的,它可能会被证明是一种有价值的选择,尤其是对于年老体弱的患者。
Spinal anesthesia for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large rectosigmoid lesions: Feasibility study.
Background and study aims Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is often challenging and time-consuming. Prolonged sedation and general anesthesia are associated with a relevant risk of anesthesia-related adverse events (ARAEs), especially in elderly and frail patients. Spinal anesthesia (SA), a simple technique providing analgesia and motor block without systemic drug administration, has never been described in gastrointestinal endoscopy. We assessed the feasibility of SA in colorectal lesion ESD. Patients and methods We retrospectively collected data on all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) under SA in our center during the last 3 years. We evaluated the rates of technical success, i.e. ESD completion under SA without need of conversion to deep sedation or general anesthesia, and ARAEs after SA. Results ESD under SA was performed on 20 rectosigmoid LSTs ≥ 35 mm. Technical success was achieved in 95.0% of cases (19/20), while one patient (5.0%) required conversion to deep sedation. Two patients (10.0%) experienced acute urinary retention that was successfully treated with temporary catheterization. Conclusions Our initial experience suggests that SA for ESD of large rectosigmoid LSTs is feasible, and it may prove to be a valuable option, especially for elderly and frail patients.