Joao Victor Cabral, Natálie Smorodinová, Eleni Voukali, Lukáš Balogh, Tomáš Kučera, Vojtěch Kolín, Pavel Studený, Tomáš Vacík, Kateřina Jirsová
{"title":"冷冻保护剂对口腔黏膜上皮细胞长期保存的影响:对干细胞保存和增殖状态的影响。","authors":"Joao Victor Cabral, Natálie Smorodinová, Eleni Voukali, Lukáš Balogh, Tomáš Kučera, Vojtěch Kolín, Pavel Studený, Tomáš Vacík, Kateřina Jirsová","doi":"10.14712/fb2024070040209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we tested a method for long-term storage of oral mucosal epithelial cells (OMECs) so that the cells could be expanded in vitro after cryopreservation and used for the treatment of bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. The ability of suspended primary OMECs to proliferate in vitro after cryopreservation was compared to that of OMEC cultures that had undergone the same process. Both were preserved in standard complex medium (COM) with or without cryoprotective agents (CPAs) (gly-cerol at 5 % or 10 % or dimethyl sulphoxide at 10 %). We found that after cryopreservation, primary OMECs could form a confluent cell sheet only in a few samples after 22 ± 2.9 (mean ± SD) days of cultivation with 72.4 % ± 12.9 % overall viability. Instead, all ex vivo OMEC cultures could re-expand after cryopreservation with a comparable viability of 78.6 ± 13.8 %, like primary OMECs, but with significantly faster growth rate (adj. P < 001), forming a confluent cell sheet at 13.7 ± 3.9 days. Gene expression analyses of the ex vivo expansion of OMEC cultures showed that the stemness, proliferation and differentiation-related gene expression was similar before and after cryopreservation, except for KRT13 expres-sion, which significantly decreased after the second passage (adj. P < 0.05). The addition of CPAs had no effect on these outcomes. In conclusion, the optimal strategy for OMEC preservation is to freeze the cells that have been previously cultured, in order to maintain cell viability and the capacity to create a sizable graft even without CPAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12281,"journal":{"name":"Folia Biologica","volume":"70 4","pages":"209-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Cryoprotectants on Long-Term Storage of Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cells: Implications for Stem Cell Preservation and Proliferation Status.\",\"authors\":\"Joao Victor Cabral, Natálie Smorodinová, Eleni Voukali, Lukáš Balogh, Tomáš Kučera, Vojtěch Kolín, Pavel Studený, Tomáš Vacík, Kateřina Jirsová\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/fb2024070040209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, we tested a method for long-term storage of oral mucosal epithelial cells (OMECs) so that the cells could be expanded in vitro after cryopreservation and used for the treatment of bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. The ability of suspended primary OMECs to proliferate in vitro after cryopreservation was compared to that of OMEC cultures that had undergone the same process. Both were preserved in standard complex medium (COM) with or without cryoprotective agents (CPAs) (gly-cerol at 5 % or 10 % or dimethyl sulphoxide at 10 %). We found that after cryopreservation, primary OMECs could form a confluent cell sheet only in a few samples after 22 ± 2.9 (mean ± SD) days of cultivation with 72.4 % ± 12.9 % overall viability. Instead, all ex vivo OMEC cultures could re-expand after cryopreservation with a comparable viability of 78.6 ± 13.8 %, like primary OMECs, but with significantly faster growth rate (adj. P < 001), forming a confluent cell sheet at 13.7 ± 3.9 days. Gene expression analyses of the ex vivo expansion of OMEC cultures showed that the stemness, proliferation and differentiation-related gene expression was similar before and after cryopreservation, except for KRT13 expres-sion, which significantly decreased after the second passage (adj. P < 0.05). The addition of CPAs had no effect on these outcomes. In conclusion, the optimal strategy for OMEC preservation is to freeze the cells that have been previously cultured, in order to maintain cell viability and the capacity to create a sizable graft even without CPAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia Biologica\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"209-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia Biologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/fb2024070040209\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Biologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/fb2024070040209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这项研究中,我们测试了口腔粘膜上皮细胞(OMECs)的长期储存方法,使细胞在体外冷冻保存后可以扩增,并用于治疗双侧角膜缘干细胞缺乏症。将冷冻保存后悬浮原代OMEC的体外增殖能力与经历相同过程的OMEC培养物进行比较。两者都保存在标准复合培养基(COM)中,有或没有冷冻保护剂(CPAs)(甘油5%或10%或二甲基亚砜10%)。我们发现,经过22±2.9(平均±SD)天的培养,原代OMECs仅在少数样品中形成融合的细胞片,总存活率为72.4%±12.9%。相反,所有体外OMEC培养物在冷冻保存后都能重新膨胀,其生存能力为78.6±13.8%,与原代OMEC相似,但生长速度明显更快(adj. P <;001),在13.7±3.9天形成融合的细胞片。对体外扩增的OMEC培养物进行基因表达分析表明,除KRT13表达在第二次传代后显著降低外,其干性、增殖和分化相关基因表达在低温保存前后基本一致(j. P <;0.05)。注册会计师的加入对这些结果没有影响。总之,保存OMEC的最佳策略是冷冻先前培养的细胞,以保持细胞活力和即使在没有cpa的情况下也能产生相当大的移植物的能力。
Effect of Cryoprotectants on Long-Term Storage of Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cells: Implications for Stem Cell Preservation and Proliferation Status.
In this study, we tested a method for long-term storage of oral mucosal epithelial cells (OMECs) so that the cells could be expanded in vitro after cryopreservation and used for the treatment of bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. The ability of suspended primary OMECs to proliferate in vitro after cryopreservation was compared to that of OMEC cultures that had undergone the same process. Both were preserved in standard complex medium (COM) with or without cryoprotective agents (CPAs) (gly-cerol at 5 % or 10 % or dimethyl sulphoxide at 10 %). We found that after cryopreservation, primary OMECs could form a confluent cell sheet only in a few samples after 22 ± 2.9 (mean ± SD) days of cultivation with 72.4 % ± 12.9 % overall viability. Instead, all ex vivo OMEC cultures could re-expand after cryopreservation with a comparable viability of 78.6 ± 13.8 %, like primary OMECs, but with significantly faster growth rate (adj. P < 001), forming a confluent cell sheet at 13.7 ± 3.9 days. Gene expression analyses of the ex vivo expansion of OMEC cultures showed that the stemness, proliferation and differentiation-related gene expression was similar before and after cryopreservation, except for KRT13 expres-sion, which significantly decreased after the second passage (adj. P < 0.05). The addition of CPAs had no effect on these outcomes. In conclusion, the optimal strategy for OMEC preservation is to freeze the cells that have been previously cultured, in order to maintain cell viability and the capacity to create a sizable graft even without CPAs.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Biology publishes articles describing original research aimed at the elucidation of a wide range of questions of biology and medicine at the cellular and molecular levels. Studies on all organisms as well as on human cells and tissues are welcome.