人工智能与锥束计算机断层扫描半自动分割下牙槽管:一项初步研究。

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Julien Issa, Tomasz Kulczyk, Michał Rychlik, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska, Raphael Olszewski, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska
{"title":"人工智能与锥束计算机断层扫描半自动分割下牙槽管:一项初步研究。","authors":"Julien Issa, Tomasz Kulczyk, Michał Rychlik, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska, Raphael Olszewski, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska","doi":"10.17219/dmp/175968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inferior alveolar canal (IAC) is a fundamental mandibular structure. It is important to conduct a precise pre-surgical evaluation of the IAC to prevent complications. Recently, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential as a valuable tool for dentists, particularly in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the segmentation time and accuracy of AI-based IAC segmentation with semi-automatic segmentation performed by a specialist.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty individual IACs from 15 anonymized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with at least 1 lower third molar were collected from the database of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland. The IACs were segmented by a trainee in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology using a semi-automatic method and automatically by an AI-based platform (Diagnocat). The resulting segmentations were overlapped with the use of Geomagic Studio, reverse engineering software, and then subjected to a statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI-based segmentation closely matched the semi-automatic method, with an average deviation of 0.275 ±0.475 mm between the overlapped segmentations. The mean segmentation time for the AI-based method (175.00 s) was similar to that of the semi-automatic method (175.67 s).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study indicate that AI-based tools may offer a reliable approach for the segmentation of the IAC in the context of dental pre-surgical planning. However, further comprehensive studies are required to compare the methods and consider their limitations more comprehensively.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":"61 6","pages":"893-899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence versus semi-automatic segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal on cone-beam computed tomography scans: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Julien Issa, Tomasz Kulczyk, Michał Rychlik, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska, Raphael Olszewski, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/dmp/175968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inferior alveolar canal (IAC) is a fundamental mandibular structure. It is important to conduct a precise pre-surgical evaluation of the IAC to prevent complications. Recently, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential as a valuable tool for dentists, particularly in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the segmentation time and accuracy of AI-based IAC segmentation with semi-automatic segmentation performed by a specialist.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty individual IACs from 15 anonymized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with at least 1 lower third molar were collected from the database of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland. The IACs were segmented by a trainee in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology using a semi-automatic method and automatically by an AI-based platform (Diagnocat). The resulting segmentations were overlapped with the use of Geomagic Studio, reverse engineering software, and then subjected to a statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI-based segmentation closely matched the semi-automatic method, with an average deviation of 0.275 ±0.475 mm between the overlapped segmentations. The mean segmentation time for the AI-based method (175.00 s) was similar to that of the semi-automatic method (175.67 s).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study indicate that AI-based tools may offer a reliable approach for the segmentation of the IAC in the context of dental pre-surgical planning. However, further comprehensive studies are required to compare the methods and consider their limitations more comprehensively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"volume\":\"61 6\",\"pages\":\"893-899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/175968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/175968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下牙槽管(IAC)是下颌的基本结构。术前对IAC进行精确的评估以预防并发症是很重要的。最近,人工智能(AI)的使用已显示出作为牙医的宝贵工具的潜力,特别是在口腔和颌面放射学领域。目的:本研究的目的是比较人工智能IAC分割与专家半自动分割的分割时间和准确性。材料和方法:从波兰波兹南医学科学大学的数据库中收集了15例至少有1个下第三磨牙的匿名锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)患者的30例IACs。IACs由口腔颌面放射学领域的实习生使用半自动方法和基于人工智能的平台(诊断)自动分割。使用逆向工程软件Geomagic Studio对所得分段进行重叠,然后进行统计分析。结果:人工智能分割结果与半自动分割结果吻合较好,重叠分割结果的平均偏差为0.275±0.475 mm。人工智能方法的平均分割时间(175.00 s)与半自动方法的平均分割时间(175.67 s)相似。结论:人工智能工具可为牙科术前规划中IAC的分割提供可靠的方法。然而,需要进一步的综合研究来比较这些方法,并更全面地考虑它们的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence versus semi-automatic segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal on cone-beam computed tomography scans: A pilot study.

Background: The inferior alveolar canal (IAC) is a fundamental mandibular structure. It is important to conduct a precise pre-surgical evaluation of the IAC to prevent complications. Recently, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential as a valuable tool for dentists, particularly in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the segmentation time and accuracy of AI-based IAC segmentation with semi-automatic segmentation performed by a specialist.

Material and methods: Thirty individual IACs from 15 anonymized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with at least 1 lower third molar were collected from the database of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland. The IACs were segmented by a trainee in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology using a semi-automatic method and automatically by an AI-based platform (Diagnocat). The resulting segmentations were overlapped with the use of Geomagic Studio, reverse engineering software, and then subjected to a statistical analysis.

Results: The AI-based segmentation closely matched the semi-automatic method, with an average deviation of 0.275 ±0.475 mm between the overlapped segmentations. The mean segmentation time for the AI-based method (175.00 s) was similar to that of the semi-automatic method (175.67 s).

Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that AI-based tools may offer a reliable approach for the segmentation of the IAC in the context of dental pre-surgical planning. However, further comprehensive studies are required to compare the methods and consider their limitations more comprehensively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信