Julien Issa, Tomasz Kulczyk, Michał Rychlik, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska, Raphael Olszewski, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska
{"title":"人工智能与锥束计算机断层扫描半自动分割下牙槽管:一项初步研究。","authors":"Julien Issa, Tomasz Kulczyk, Michał Rychlik, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska, Raphael Olszewski, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska","doi":"10.17219/dmp/175968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inferior alveolar canal (IAC) is a fundamental mandibular structure. It is important to conduct a precise pre-surgical evaluation of the IAC to prevent complications. Recently, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential as a valuable tool for dentists, particularly in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the segmentation time and accuracy of AI-based IAC segmentation with semi-automatic segmentation performed by a specialist.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty individual IACs from 15 anonymized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with at least 1 lower third molar were collected from the database of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland. The IACs were segmented by a trainee in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology using a semi-automatic method and automatically by an AI-based platform (Diagnocat). The resulting segmentations were overlapped with the use of Geomagic Studio, reverse engineering software, and then subjected to a statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI-based segmentation closely matched the semi-automatic method, with an average deviation of 0.275 ±0.475 mm between the overlapped segmentations. The mean segmentation time for the AI-based method (175.00 s) was similar to that of the semi-automatic method (175.67 s).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study indicate that AI-based tools may offer a reliable approach for the segmentation of the IAC in the context of dental pre-surgical planning. However, further comprehensive studies are required to compare the methods and consider their limitations more comprehensively.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":"61 6","pages":"893-899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence versus semi-automatic segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal on cone-beam computed tomography scans: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Julien Issa, Tomasz Kulczyk, Michał Rychlik, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska, Raphael Olszewski, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/dmp/175968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inferior alveolar canal (IAC) is a fundamental mandibular structure. It is important to conduct a precise pre-surgical evaluation of the IAC to prevent complications. Recently, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential as a valuable tool for dentists, particularly in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the segmentation time and accuracy of AI-based IAC segmentation with semi-automatic segmentation performed by a specialist.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty individual IACs from 15 anonymized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with at least 1 lower third molar were collected from the database of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland. The IACs were segmented by a trainee in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology using a semi-automatic method and automatically by an AI-based platform (Diagnocat). The resulting segmentations were overlapped with the use of Geomagic Studio, reverse engineering software, and then subjected to a statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI-based segmentation closely matched the semi-automatic method, with an average deviation of 0.275 ±0.475 mm between the overlapped segmentations. The mean segmentation time for the AI-based method (175.00 s) was similar to that of the semi-automatic method (175.67 s).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study indicate that AI-based tools may offer a reliable approach for the segmentation of the IAC in the context of dental pre-surgical planning. However, further comprehensive studies are required to compare the methods and consider their limitations more comprehensively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"volume\":\"61 6\",\"pages\":\"893-899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/175968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/175968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence versus semi-automatic segmentation of the inferior alveolar canal on cone-beam computed tomography scans: A pilot study.
Background: The inferior alveolar canal (IAC) is a fundamental mandibular structure. It is important to conduct a precise pre-surgical evaluation of the IAC to prevent complications. Recently, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential as a valuable tool for dentists, particularly in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology.
Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the segmentation time and accuracy of AI-based IAC segmentation with semi-automatic segmentation performed by a specialist.
Material and methods: Thirty individual IACs from 15 anonymized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with at least 1 lower third molar were collected from the database of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland. The IACs were segmented by a trainee in the field of oral and maxillofacial radiology using a semi-automatic method and automatically by an AI-based platform (Diagnocat). The resulting segmentations were overlapped with the use of Geomagic Studio, reverse engineering software, and then subjected to a statistical analysis.
Results: The AI-based segmentation closely matched the semi-automatic method, with an average deviation of 0.275 ±0.475 mm between the overlapped segmentations. The mean segmentation time for the AI-based method (175.00 s) was similar to that of the semi-automatic method (175.67 s).
Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that AI-based tools may offer a reliable approach for the segmentation of the IAC in the context of dental pre-surgical planning. However, further comprehensive studies are required to compare the methods and consider their limitations more comprehensively.