响应面法优化胶凝料:系统综述

IF 4.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Nerea Hurtado-Alonso, Javier Manso-Morato, Víctor Revilla-Cuesta, Marta Skaf, Vanesa Ortega-López
{"title":"响应面法优化胶凝料:系统综述","authors":"Nerea Hurtado-Alonso,&nbsp;Javier Manso-Morato,&nbsp;Víctor Revilla-Cuesta,&nbsp;Marta Skaf,&nbsp;Vanesa Ortega-López","doi":"10.1007/s43452-024-01112-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The pursuit of cement-based materials with enhanced mechanical performance in the construction industry involves formulating numerous mixtures with varied contents of raw materials. However, the scarcity or contamination of these materials demands optimization methods to minimize the number of trials required. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a statistical experimental optimization method with which relations between sets of factors and responses can be established. This systematic review aims to analyze the existing literature on RSM models developed to achieve optimum levels in cementitious mixes. Over 100 papers were analyzed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) format. A comprehensive review of the RSM analyses in those studies and their effectiveness is conducted, through the evaluation of their optimized factors and responses, the selection of their design models, their use of ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA), and the determination of their coefficients of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>). Factors such as water/cement ratio and binder content prevailed in most models, the predominant responses of which were, respectively, compressive strength and workability. Although the use of ANOVA is commonly used to demonstrate the validity of the models, the studies replicating the mix with optimal levels of all factors are necessary to validate the results. On the basis of this review and depending on the responses that need to be maximized or minimized, the application of RSM can clearly be very crucial when quantifying the effects of new raw materials, whether recovered waste or natural resources, on mix behaviour.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55474,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43452-024-01112-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of cementitious mixes through response surface method: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Nerea Hurtado-Alonso,&nbsp;Javier Manso-Morato,&nbsp;Víctor Revilla-Cuesta,&nbsp;Marta Skaf,&nbsp;Vanesa Ortega-López\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43452-024-01112-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The pursuit of cement-based materials with enhanced mechanical performance in the construction industry involves formulating numerous mixtures with varied contents of raw materials. However, the scarcity or contamination of these materials demands optimization methods to minimize the number of trials required. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a statistical experimental optimization method with which relations between sets of factors and responses can be established. This systematic review aims to analyze the existing literature on RSM models developed to achieve optimum levels in cementitious mixes. Over 100 papers were analyzed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) format. A comprehensive review of the RSM analyses in those studies and their effectiveness is conducted, through the evaluation of their optimized factors and responses, the selection of their design models, their use of ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA), and the determination of their coefficients of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>). Factors such as water/cement ratio and binder content prevailed in most models, the predominant responses of which were, respectively, compressive strength and workability. Although the use of ANOVA is commonly used to demonstrate the validity of the models, the studies replicating the mix with optimal levels of all factors are necessary to validate the results. On the basis of this review and depending on the responses that need to be maximized or minimized, the application of RSM can clearly be very crucial when quantifying the effects of new raw materials, whether recovered waste or natural resources, on mix behaviour.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43452-024-01112-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43452-024-01112-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43452-024-01112-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在建筑行业中,对具有增强机械性能的水泥基材料的追求涉及到用不同含量的原材料配制多种混合物。然而,这些材料的稀缺性或污染要求优化方法,以尽量减少所需的试验次数。响应面法(Response Surface Methodology, RSM)是一种统计实验优化方法,它可以建立因子集与响应之间的关系。本系统综述旨在分析现有文献的RSM模型开发,以达到胶凝混合物的最佳水平。根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)格式对100多篇论文进行了分析。通过对这些研究的优化因子和响应的评价、设计模型的选择、方差分析(ANOVA)的使用以及决定系数(R2)的确定,对这些研究中的RSM分析及其有效性进行了全面的回顾。水灰比和粘结剂含量等因素在大多数模型中占主导地位,其主要响应分别是抗压强度和和易性。虽然使用方差分析通常用于证明模型的有效性,但复制所有因素的最佳水平的混合研究是验证结果所必需的。在这项审查的基础上,根据需要最大限度地或最小限度地作出反应,在量化新原料,无论是回收的废物还是自然资源对混合行为的影响时,应用可再生资源管理显然是非常关键的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of cementitious mixes through response surface method: a systematic review

The pursuit of cement-based materials with enhanced mechanical performance in the construction industry involves formulating numerous mixtures with varied contents of raw materials. However, the scarcity or contamination of these materials demands optimization methods to minimize the number of trials required. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a statistical experimental optimization method with which relations between sets of factors and responses can be established. This systematic review aims to analyze the existing literature on RSM models developed to achieve optimum levels in cementitious mixes. Over 100 papers were analyzed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) format. A comprehensive review of the RSM analyses in those studies and their effectiveness is conducted, through the evaluation of their optimized factors and responses, the selection of their design models, their use of ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA), and the determination of their coefficients of determination (R2). Factors such as water/cement ratio and binder content prevailed in most models, the predominant responses of which were, respectively, compressive strength and workability. Although the use of ANOVA is commonly used to demonstrate the validity of the models, the studies replicating the mix with optimal levels of all factors are necessary to validate the results. On the basis of this review and depending on the responses that need to be maximized or minimized, the application of RSM can clearly be very crucial when quantifying the effects of new raw materials, whether recovered waste or natural resources, on mix behaviour.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
201
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering (ACME) publishes both theoretical and experimental original research articles which explore or exploit new ideas and techniques in three main areas: structural engineering, mechanics of materials and materials science. The aim of the journal is to advance science related to structural engineering focusing on structures, machines and mechanical systems. The journal also promotes advancement in the area of mechanics of materials, by publishing most recent findings in elasticity, plasticity, rheology, fatigue and fracture mechanics. The third area the journal is concentrating on is materials science, with emphasis on metals, composites, etc., their structures and properties as well as methods of evaluation. In addition to research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes state-of-the-art reviews on specialized topics. All such articles have to be sent to the Editor-in-Chief before submission for pre-submission review process. Only articles approved by the Editor-in-Chief in pre-submission process can be submitted to the journal for further processing. Approval in pre-submission stage doesn''t guarantee acceptance for publication as all papers are subject to a regular referee procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信