分析血浆置换治疗抗 NMDA 受体脑炎的有效性和安全性。

Jing Li, Binghai Huang, Qifang Lao, Longtao Zou, Kaiqing Xie
{"title":"分析血浆置换治疗抗 NMDA 受体脑炎的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Jing Li, Binghai Huang, Qifang Lao, Longtao Zou, Kaiqing Xie","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of plasma exchange (PE) in the treatment of glucocorticoid-insensitive patients with serum anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (anti-NMDA) receptor antibody-negative and serum anti-NMDA receptor antibody-positive encephalitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 20 patients with anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis treated between January 2015 and December 2022 were collected. The general information, clinical symptoms, auxiliary examination, treatment (hormone, PE, etc.), adverse reactions, clinical efficacy, and other related data were retrospectively compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 cases had adverse reactions (9.76%, 8/82), including 4 cases (4.88%, 4/82) of allergy and 2 cases (2.44%,2/82) of thrombocytopenia. In patients with anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis who were not sensitive to glucocorticoids, the effective rate of PE was 80.0% (p = 0.0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PE combined with glucocorticoid is more effective than glucocorticoid alone in the treatment of anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis patients with positive or negative anti-NMDA receptor antibodies. Most adverse reactions were mild and easy to manage. It does not cause obvious blood cell loss. PE is a safe and acceptable treatment. However, our study has limitations, and due to the small number of people and the fact that plasmapheresis was performed after glucocorticoid therapy, further prospective clinical studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To analyze the efficacy and safety of plasma exchange in the treatment of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Li, Binghai Huang, Qifang Lao, Longtao Zou, Kaiqing Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-9987.14240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of plasma exchange (PE) in the treatment of glucocorticoid-insensitive patients with serum anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (anti-NMDA) receptor antibody-negative and serum anti-NMDA receptor antibody-positive encephalitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 20 patients with anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis treated between January 2015 and December 2022 were collected. The general information, clinical symptoms, auxiliary examination, treatment (hormone, PE, etc.), adverse reactions, clinical efficacy, and other related data were retrospectively compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 cases had adverse reactions (9.76%, 8/82), including 4 cases (4.88%, 4/82) of allergy and 2 cases (2.44%,2/82) of thrombocytopenia. In patients with anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis who were not sensitive to glucocorticoids, the effective rate of PE was 80.0% (p = 0.0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PE combined with glucocorticoid is more effective than glucocorticoid alone in the treatment of anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis patients with positive or negative anti-NMDA receptor antibodies. Most adverse reactions were mild and easy to manage. It does not cause obvious blood cell loss. PE is a safe and acceptable treatment. However, our study has limitations, and due to the small number of people and the fact that plasmapheresis was performed after glucocorticoid therapy, further prospective clinical studies are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言目的:探讨血浆置换(PE)治疗对糖皮质激素不敏感的血清抗N-甲基-d-天冬氨酸(anti-NMDA)受体抗体阴性和血清抗NMDA受体抗体阳性脑炎患者的临床疗效和安全性:收集2015年1月至2022年12月期间收治的20例抗NMDA受体抗体脑炎患者的临床资料。对其一般资料、临床症状、辅助检查、治疗(激素、PE等)、不良反应、临床疗效等相关资料进行回顾性对比分析:共有8例出现不良反应(9.76%,8/82),其中过敏4例(4.88%,4/82),血小板减少2例(2.44%,2/82)。在对糖皮质激素不敏感的抗NMDA受体抗体脑炎患者中,PE的有效率为80.0%(P = 0.0005):结论:PE联合糖皮质激素治疗抗NMDA受体抗体阳性或阴性的抗NMDA受体抗体脑炎患者的疗效优于单用糖皮质激素。大多数不良反应轻微,易于处理。它不会导致明显的血细胞丢失。PE 是一种安全、可接受的治疗方法。不过,我们的研究也有局限性,由于人数较少,而且浆细胞吸出术是在糖皮质激素治疗后进行的,因此有必要进行进一步的前瞻性临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To analyze the efficacy and safety of plasma exchange in the treatment of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.

Introduction: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of plasma exchange (PE) in the treatment of glucocorticoid-insensitive patients with serum anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (anti-NMDA) receptor antibody-negative and serum anti-NMDA receptor antibody-positive encephalitis.

Methods: The clinical data of 20 patients with anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis treated between January 2015 and December 2022 were collected. The general information, clinical symptoms, auxiliary examination, treatment (hormone, PE, etc.), adverse reactions, clinical efficacy, and other related data were retrospectively compared and analyzed.

Results: A total of 8 cases had adverse reactions (9.76%, 8/82), including 4 cases (4.88%, 4/82) of allergy and 2 cases (2.44%,2/82) of thrombocytopenia. In patients with anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis who were not sensitive to glucocorticoids, the effective rate of PE was 80.0% (p = 0.0005).

Conclusion: PE combined with glucocorticoid is more effective than glucocorticoid alone in the treatment of anti-NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis patients with positive or negative anti-NMDA receptor antibodies. Most adverse reactions were mild and easy to manage. It does not cause obvious blood cell loss. PE is a safe and acceptable treatment. However, our study has limitations, and due to the small number of people and the fact that plasmapheresis was performed after glucocorticoid therapy, further prospective clinical studies are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信