Kabir Hossain, Tonmoy Alam Shuvo, Asma-Ul Hosna, Dipu Rani Dey
{"title":"孟加拉国社会经济不平等对高血压风险的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Kabir Hossain, Tonmoy Alam Shuvo, Asma-Ul Hosna, Dipu Rani Dey","doi":"10.1111/jch.14957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertension is a prevalent health issue in Bangladesh, impacting a significant portion of the population. This meta-analysis explored how social status inequalities impact hypertension risk in Bangladesh. We systematically searched various electronic databases and rigorously selected 12 studies for inclusion in the analyses. The I<sup>2</sup> statistic measured between study heterogeneity, and pooled effect estimates were obtained using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to address this variability. Publication bias was assessed through a funnel plot and Egger's test. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings. All analyses were performed using STATA 17. The analyses indicated that females had a significantly higher risk of developing hypertension compared to males, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.27). Urban residents showed a pooled OR of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03-1.19) compared to rural residents. The pooled ORs for hypertension were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.89-1.14) for primary education, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94-1.21) for secondary education, and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.03-1.47) for higher secondary education, suggesting an increasing risk with higher education levels. Wealth status showed a pooled OR of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.87-1.29) for the poorer class, 1.13 (95% CI: 1.04-1.22) for the middle class, 1.38 (95% CI: 0.68-2.07) for the richer class, and 1.49 (95% CI: 0.97-2.00) for the richest class, indicating a greater risk of hypertension among wealthier individuals. Working individuals had a 39% lower risk of hypertension (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.80) compared to nonworking individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"e14957"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Socioeconomic Inequalities on the Risk of Hypertension in Bangladesh: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kabir Hossain, Tonmoy Alam Shuvo, Asma-Ul Hosna, Dipu Rani Dey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.14957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hypertension is a prevalent health issue in Bangladesh, impacting a significant portion of the population. This meta-analysis explored how social status inequalities impact hypertension risk in Bangladesh. We systematically searched various electronic databases and rigorously selected 12 studies for inclusion in the analyses. The I<sup>2</sup> statistic measured between study heterogeneity, and pooled effect estimates were obtained using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to address this variability. Publication bias was assessed through a funnel plot and Egger's test. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings. All analyses were performed using STATA 17. The analyses indicated that females had a significantly higher risk of developing hypertension compared to males, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.27). Urban residents showed a pooled OR of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03-1.19) compared to rural residents. The pooled ORs for hypertension were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.89-1.14) for primary education, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94-1.21) for secondary education, and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.03-1.47) for higher secondary education, suggesting an increasing risk with higher education levels. Wealth status showed a pooled OR of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.87-1.29) for the poorer class, 1.13 (95% CI: 1.04-1.22) for the middle class, 1.38 (95% CI: 0.68-2.07) for the richer class, and 1.49 (95% CI: 0.97-2.00) for the richest class, indicating a greater risk of hypertension among wealthier individuals. Working individuals had a 39% lower risk of hypertension (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.80) compared to nonworking individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14957\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14957\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Socioeconomic Inequalities on the Risk of Hypertension in Bangladesh: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hypertension is a prevalent health issue in Bangladesh, impacting a significant portion of the population. This meta-analysis explored how social status inequalities impact hypertension risk in Bangladesh. We systematically searched various electronic databases and rigorously selected 12 studies for inclusion in the analyses. The I2 statistic measured between study heterogeneity, and pooled effect estimates were obtained using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to address this variability. Publication bias was assessed through a funnel plot and Egger's test. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings. All analyses were performed using STATA 17. The analyses indicated that females had a significantly higher risk of developing hypertension compared to males, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.27). Urban residents showed a pooled OR of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03-1.19) compared to rural residents. The pooled ORs for hypertension were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.89-1.14) for primary education, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94-1.21) for secondary education, and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.03-1.47) for higher secondary education, suggesting an increasing risk with higher education levels. Wealth status showed a pooled OR of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.87-1.29) for the poorer class, 1.13 (95% CI: 1.04-1.22) for the middle class, 1.38 (95% CI: 0.68-2.07) for the richer class, and 1.49 (95% CI: 0.97-2.00) for the richest class, indicating a greater risk of hypertension among wealthier individuals. Working individuals had a 39% lower risk of hypertension (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.80) compared to nonworking individuals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.