感知免疫力,预测躯体症状:感知免疫力 "量表的验证及其与日常健康的关联。

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nofar Mizrachi, Tobias Kube, Liron Rozenkrantz
{"title":"感知免疫力,预测躯体症状:感知免疫力 \"量表的验证及其与日常健康的关联。","authors":"Nofar Mizrachi,&nbsp;Tobias Kube,&nbsp;Liron Rozenkrantz","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>While ample research links health beliefs to physical health in both healthy and clinical populations, the specific health beliefs that drive this effect remain underexplored. Addressing this gap is critical for mechanistic examinations and targeted intervention development. Building on previous work, this study aimed to assess subjective beliefs about immune system efficacy and develop a novel Perceived Immunity scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Across three studies (total <i>N</i> = 378; Study 1: <i>N</i> = 206 healthy; Study 2: <i>N</i> = 132 healthy and <i>N</i> = 40 with immune-related diseases; and Study 3: subset of <i>N</i> = 87 from Study 2), we examine Perceived Immunity scale's validity, reliability, and association with everyday physical health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Perceived immunity demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.9), strong construct validity (all items were loaded onto one factor) and structural validity, including convergence validity with scales assessing subjective health perceptions, and discriminant validity from scales measuring external health control. These findings were replicated across different cohorts. Furthermore, regression analyses revealed significant correlations with daily physical health measures, specifically somatic symptoms, across cohorts (all <i>β</i> &gt; −0.347, all <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and sick leave days (all <i>β</i> = −0.174, all <i>p</i> &lt; .045). These associations were stronger in individuals with immune-related conditions. Finally, Perceived Immunity exhibited good test–retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.74) and prospectively predicted somatic symptoms over time (<i>β</i> = −0.324, <i>p</i> = .002), with significant results observed up to 1 year.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Perceived Immunity scale offers a valuable tool for researchers and health care providers, providing insights into the interplay between specific health beliefs and daily health. Furthermore, its validation lays the groundwork for targeted interventions that explore how health perceptions may directly influence actual physical experiences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12772","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceiving immunity, predicting somatic symptoms: Validation of the ‘Perceived Immunity’ scale and its association with daily health\",\"authors\":\"Nofar Mizrachi,&nbsp;Tobias Kube,&nbsp;Liron Rozenkrantz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjhp.12772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>While ample research links health beliefs to physical health in both healthy and clinical populations, the specific health beliefs that drive this effect remain underexplored. Addressing this gap is critical for mechanistic examinations and targeted intervention development. Building on previous work, this study aimed to assess subjective beliefs about immune system efficacy and develop a novel Perceived Immunity scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Across three studies (total <i>N</i> = 378; Study 1: <i>N</i> = 206 healthy; Study 2: <i>N</i> = 132 healthy and <i>N</i> = 40 with immune-related diseases; and Study 3: subset of <i>N</i> = 87 from Study 2), we examine Perceived Immunity scale's validity, reliability, and association with everyday physical health.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Perceived immunity demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.9), strong construct validity (all items were loaded onto one factor) and structural validity, including convergence validity with scales assessing subjective health perceptions, and discriminant validity from scales measuring external health control. These findings were replicated across different cohorts. Furthermore, regression analyses revealed significant correlations with daily physical health measures, specifically somatic symptoms, across cohorts (all <i>β</i> &gt; −0.347, all <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and sick leave days (all <i>β</i> = −0.174, all <i>p</i> &lt; .045). These associations were stronger in individuals with immune-related conditions. Finally, Perceived Immunity exhibited good test–retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.74) and prospectively predicted somatic symptoms over time (<i>β</i> = −0.324, <i>p</i> = .002), with significant results observed up to 1 year.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Perceived Immunity scale offers a valuable tool for researchers and health care providers, providing insights into the interplay between specific health beliefs and daily health. Furthermore, its validation lays the groundwork for targeted interventions that explore how health perceptions may directly influence actual physical experiences.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12772\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12772\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管有大量研究将健康信念与健康和临床人群的身体健康联系起来,但对驱动这种效应的具体健康信念的研究仍然不足。填补这一空白对于机理研究和有针对性的干预措施开发至关重要。在以往工作的基础上,本研究旨在评估有关免疫系统功效的主观信念,并制定新的感知免疫力量表:通过三项研究(总人数 = 378;研究 1:206 名健康人;研究 2:132 名健康人和 40 名免疫相关疾病患者;研究 3:研究 2 中的 87 人子集),我们考察了感知免疫力量表的有效性、可靠性以及与日常身体健康的关联性:结果:感知免疫力表现出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach alpha = 0.9)、较强的结构效度(所有项目都被加载到一个因子上)和结构效度,包括与评估主观健康感知的量表的趋同效度,以及与评估外部健康控制的量表的区分效度。这些结果在不同的组群中得到了重复。此外,回归分析表明,该量表与不同组群的日常身体健康指标,特别是躯体症状,存在显著相关性(所有 β > -0.347,所有 p 均为结论):感知免疫力量表为研究人员和医疗保健提供者提供了一个宝贵的工具,使他们能够深入了解特定健康信念与日常健康之间的相互作用。此外,该量表的验证还为有针对性的干预措施奠定了基础,这些干预措施将探索健康观念如何直接影响实际的身体体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceiving immunity, predicting somatic symptoms: Validation of the ‘Perceived Immunity’ scale and its association with daily health

Objective

While ample research links health beliefs to physical health in both healthy and clinical populations, the specific health beliefs that drive this effect remain underexplored. Addressing this gap is critical for mechanistic examinations and targeted intervention development. Building on previous work, this study aimed to assess subjective beliefs about immune system efficacy and develop a novel Perceived Immunity scale.

Methods

Across three studies (total N = 378; Study 1: N = 206 healthy; Study 2: N = 132 healthy and N = 40 with immune-related diseases; and Study 3: subset of N = 87 from Study 2), we examine Perceived Immunity scale's validity, reliability, and association with everyday physical health.

Results

Perceived immunity demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.9), strong construct validity (all items were loaded onto one factor) and structural validity, including convergence validity with scales assessing subjective health perceptions, and discriminant validity from scales measuring external health control. These findings were replicated across different cohorts. Furthermore, regression analyses revealed significant correlations with daily physical health measures, specifically somatic symptoms, across cohorts (all β > −0.347, all p < .001) and sick leave days (all β = −0.174, all p < .045). These associations were stronger in individuals with immune-related conditions. Finally, Perceived Immunity exhibited good test–retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.74) and prospectively predicted somatic symptoms over time (β = −0.324, p = .002), with significant results observed up to 1 year.

Conclusions

The Perceived Immunity scale offers a valuable tool for researchers and health care providers, providing insights into the interplay between specific health beliefs and daily health. Furthermore, its validation lays the groundwork for targeted interventions that explore how health perceptions may directly influence actual physical experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信