Christian Liebsch, Peter Obid, Morten Vogt, Benedikt Schlager, Hans-Joachim Wilke
{"title":"Spinal instrumentation length affects adjacent segment range of motion and intradiscal pressure.","authors":"Christian Liebsch, Peter Obid, Morten Vogt, Benedikt Schlager, Hans-Joachim Wilke","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-82132-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scoliosis instrumentation length depends on the type and degree of deformity and the individual preference of the surgeon. This in vitro study aimed to explore effects of increasing instrumentation length on adjacent segment mobility and intervertebral disc loading. Six fresh frozen human spine specimens (C7-sacrum) with entire rib cage from young adult donors (26-45 years) were loaded with pure moments of 5 Nm. Range of motion (ROM) of all segments was determined using optical motion tracking. Lumbar intradiscal pressure (IDP) was measured using flexible pressure sensors from L1 to L5. The specimens were tested in two groups with increasing posterior instrumentation length in proximal (group 1) and distal direction (group 2). Significant (p < 0.05) adjacent segment ROM increases compared to the condition without any instrumentation and compared to other instrumentations were primarily found proximally to the instrumentation in lateral bending. IDP significantly (p < 0.05) increased in flexion in the distal adjacent segment for T4-L1 instrumentation and by up to 550% at instrumented levels compared to the condition without instrumentation. These findings may explain clinical complications such as adjacent segment disease and associated proximal and distal junctional kyphosis. To reduce loads on adjacent segments, instrumentation should therefore be applied as short as reasonable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"30496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82132-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spinal instrumentation length affects adjacent segment range of motion and intradiscal pressure.
Scoliosis instrumentation length depends on the type and degree of deformity and the individual preference of the surgeon. This in vitro study aimed to explore effects of increasing instrumentation length on adjacent segment mobility and intervertebral disc loading. Six fresh frozen human spine specimens (C7-sacrum) with entire rib cage from young adult donors (26-45 years) were loaded with pure moments of 5 Nm. Range of motion (ROM) of all segments was determined using optical motion tracking. Lumbar intradiscal pressure (IDP) was measured using flexible pressure sensors from L1 to L5. The specimens were tested in two groups with increasing posterior instrumentation length in proximal (group 1) and distal direction (group 2). Significant (p < 0.05) adjacent segment ROM increases compared to the condition without any instrumentation and compared to other instrumentations were primarily found proximally to the instrumentation in lateral bending. IDP significantly (p < 0.05) increased in flexion in the distal adjacent segment for T4-L1 instrumentation and by up to 550% at instrumented levels compared to the condition without instrumentation. These findings may explain clinical complications such as adjacent segment disease and associated proximal and distal junctional kyphosis. To reduce loads on adjacent segments, instrumentation should therefore be applied as short as reasonable.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.