{"title":"Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure during induced hypertension and its impact on delayed cerebral infarction and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage.","authors":"Beate Kranawetter, Sheri Tuzi, Onnen Moerer, Dorothee Mielke, Veit Rohde, Vesna Malinova","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-82507-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disturbed cerebral autoregulation (CA) increases the dependency of cerebral blood flow (CBF) on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Thus, induced hypertension (IHT) is used to prevent secondary ischemic events. The pressure reactivity index (PRx) assesses CA and can determine the optimal CPP (CPPopt). This study investigates CPPopt in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) treated with IHT and its impact on delayed cerebral infarction and functional outcome. This is a retrospective observational study including SAH patients treated between 2012 and 2020. PRx defines the correlation coefficient of intracranial pressure (ICP) and the mean arterial pressure (MAP). The CPP corresponding to the lowest PRx-value describes CPPopt. Primary outcome parameters were deleayed cerebral infarction and functional outcome. In patients without IHT, higher deviations of measured CPP from CPPopt were associated with delayed cerebral infarction (p = 0.001). Longer time spent with a CPP below the calculated CPPopt during IHT led to an increased risk of developing delayed cerebral infarction (r = 0.39, p = 0.002). A larger deviation of measured CPP from CPPopt correlated with an unfavorable outcome in patients treated with IHT (p = 0.04) and without IHT (p = 0.0007). Patients with severe aneurysmal SAH may benefit from an individualized CPP management and the calculation of CPPopt may help to guide IHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"30509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82507-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure during induced hypertension and its impact on delayed cerebral infarction and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Disturbed cerebral autoregulation (CA) increases the dependency of cerebral blood flow (CBF) on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Thus, induced hypertension (IHT) is used to prevent secondary ischemic events. The pressure reactivity index (PRx) assesses CA and can determine the optimal CPP (CPPopt). This study investigates CPPopt in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) treated with IHT and its impact on delayed cerebral infarction and functional outcome. This is a retrospective observational study including SAH patients treated between 2012 and 2020. PRx defines the correlation coefficient of intracranial pressure (ICP) and the mean arterial pressure (MAP). The CPP corresponding to the lowest PRx-value describes CPPopt. Primary outcome parameters were deleayed cerebral infarction and functional outcome. In patients without IHT, higher deviations of measured CPP from CPPopt were associated with delayed cerebral infarction (p = 0.001). Longer time spent with a CPP below the calculated CPPopt during IHT led to an increased risk of developing delayed cerebral infarction (r = 0.39, p = 0.002). A larger deviation of measured CPP from CPPopt correlated with an unfavorable outcome in patients treated with IHT (p = 0.04) and without IHT (p = 0.0007). Patients with severe aneurysmal SAH may benefit from an individualized CPP management and the calculation of CPPopt may help to guide IHT.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.