伊拉克纳杰夫地区针对不同细菌性尿路感染病原体所使用抗生素的活性评估。

Q3 Medicine
Iranian Journal of Pathology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.30699/ijp.2024.2027209.3293
Mohammed Jasim Al-Shamarti
{"title":"伊拉克纳杰夫地区针对不同细菌性尿路感染病原体所使用抗生素的活性评估。","authors":"Mohammed Jasim Al-Shamarti","doi":"10.30699/ijp.2024.2027209.3293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Antibiotic resistance in urinary tract infection (UTI) is increasing nowadays, therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the resistance patterns of many pathogens toward several antibiotics that are in common use in our hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subculture and identification of pathogenic bacteria were performed on 1148 hospitals' bacterial primary cultures which were considered positive for UTI. An antibiotic sensitivity test was performed by using the disc diffusion method. The rates of resistance were statistically analyzed and correlated with the types of antibiotics and bacteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that 1148 out of 2087 urine samples were UTI positive, the majority of cases (76%) were from females (<i>P</i><0.0001). <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella</i> were the most isolated Gram-negative bacteria, while Staphylococcus spp. was the most isolated Gram-positive pathogen. E. coli showed the highest resistance rate among all bacteria, while Streptococcus spp. was the most sensitive. The highest resistance was noticed to be against gentamicin and ampicillin, while the most effective drugs were imipenem and amikacin. There was a significant difference in resistance rates among the different bacterial categories (<i>P</i><0.0001), while no significant difference was noticed in resistance rates among antibiotics categories (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated rates of antibiotic resistance were noticed in this study in UTI-causing bacteria; therefore, it is highly important at least to every general hospital to investigate the antibiotic resistance rates occasionally to determine the proper antimicrobial treatment as well as re-evaluate antibiotics which were considered as empirical.</p>","PeriodicalId":38900,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pathology","volume":"19 3","pages":"348-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Activity Assessment of Antibiotics Used Against Different Bacterial Etiological Agents of UTI in Najaf, Iraq.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Jasim Al-Shamarti\",\"doi\":\"10.30699/ijp.2024.2027209.3293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Antibiotic resistance in urinary tract infection (UTI) is increasing nowadays, therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the resistance patterns of many pathogens toward several antibiotics that are in common use in our hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subculture and identification of pathogenic bacteria were performed on 1148 hospitals' bacterial primary cultures which were considered positive for UTI. An antibiotic sensitivity test was performed by using the disc diffusion method. The rates of resistance were statistically analyzed and correlated with the types of antibiotics and bacteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that 1148 out of 2087 urine samples were UTI positive, the majority of cases (76%) were from females (<i>P</i><0.0001). <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella</i> were the most isolated Gram-negative bacteria, while Staphylococcus spp. was the most isolated Gram-positive pathogen. E. coli showed the highest resistance rate among all bacteria, while Streptococcus spp. was the most sensitive. The highest resistance was noticed to be against gentamicin and ampicillin, while the most effective drugs were imipenem and amikacin. There was a significant difference in resistance rates among the different bacterial categories (<i>P</i><0.0001), while no significant difference was noticed in resistance rates among antibiotics categories (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated rates of antibiotic resistance were noticed in this study in UTI-causing bacteria; therefore, it is highly important at least to every general hospital to investigate the antibiotic resistance rates occasionally to determine the proper antimicrobial treatment as well as re-evaluate antibiotics which were considered as empirical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Pathology\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"348-354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646199/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijp.2024.2027209.3293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijp.2024.2027209.3293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:尿路感染(UTI)的耐药性日益增加,因此,本研究的目的是评估多种病原菌对我院常用几种抗生素的耐药模式。方法:对医院1148例尿路感染阳性的细菌原代培养进行传代培养和病原菌鉴定。采用圆盘扩散法进行抗生素敏感性试验。对耐药率进行统计分析,并与抗生素和细菌种类相关。结果:2087份尿样中检出尿路感染阳性1148例,以女性居多(76%)(革兰氏阴性菌以大肠杆菌和克雷伯氏菌最多,革兰氏阳性菌以葡萄球菌最多)。大肠杆菌耐药率最高,链球菌最敏感。对庆大霉素和氨苄西林的耐药性最高,对亚胺培南和阿米卡星的耐药性最强。不同菌种间耐药率差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:本研究发现引起尿路感染的细菌中抗生素耐药率升高;因此,至少对每家综合医院来说,偶尔调查抗生素耐药率以确定适当的抗菌药物治疗以及重新评估被认为是经验性的抗生素是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Activity Assessment of Antibiotics Used Against Different Bacterial Etiological Agents of UTI in Najaf, Iraq.

Background & objective: Antibiotic resistance in urinary tract infection (UTI) is increasing nowadays, therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the resistance patterns of many pathogens toward several antibiotics that are in common use in our hospitals.

Methods: Subculture and identification of pathogenic bacteria were performed on 1148 hospitals' bacterial primary cultures which were considered positive for UTI. An antibiotic sensitivity test was performed by using the disc diffusion method. The rates of resistance were statistically analyzed and correlated with the types of antibiotics and bacteria.

Results: It was found that 1148 out of 2087 urine samples were UTI positive, the majority of cases (76%) were from females (P<0.0001). Escherichia coli and Klebsiella were the most isolated Gram-negative bacteria, while Staphylococcus spp. was the most isolated Gram-positive pathogen. E. coli showed the highest resistance rate among all bacteria, while Streptococcus spp. was the most sensitive. The highest resistance was noticed to be against gentamicin and ampicillin, while the most effective drugs were imipenem and amikacin. There was a significant difference in resistance rates among the different bacterial categories (P<0.0001), while no significant difference was noticed in resistance rates among antibiotics categories (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Elevated rates of antibiotic resistance were noticed in this study in UTI-causing bacteria; therefore, it is highly important at least to every general hospital to investigate the antibiotic resistance rates occasionally to determine the proper antimicrobial treatment as well as re-evaluate antibiotics which were considered as empirical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Pathology
Iranian Journal of Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信