{"title":"细胞外囊泡作为标准疗法:加快监管进程是否有助于实现目标?","authors":"Vaijayanti Kale","doi":"10.1080/17460751.2024.2442847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) became a focus of clinical research when experimental and pre-clinical studies showed that they mimic their parent cells' regenerative and therapeutic effects and their cargo carries disease-specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Since the publication of data forms an endpoint of the study, this review specifically focused on the <i>published clinical trials</i> done with EVs. For brevity, this review was restricted to the last 10 years. Unexpectedly, the literature search showed that very few clinical trials assessing the therapeutic applications of EVs were published in this period indicating that they have not reached their desired endpoint. Conversely, most studies showed the potential of EVs present in various biofluids as a promising source of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for various diseases, and predictive markers to assess the effectiveness of therapy. This stark difference in the numbers could perhaps be due to the time-consuming regulatory processes involved in the clinical-grade preparation and characterization of EVs, and the determination of their safety and effective dose regimens. One wonders whether fast-tracking regulatory affairs could help accelerate the therapeutic use of EVs. This aspect needs urgent attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":21043,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracellular vesicles as standard-of-care therapy: will fast-tracking the regulatory processes help achieve the goal?\",\"authors\":\"Vaijayanti Kale\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17460751.2024.2442847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) became a focus of clinical research when experimental and pre-clinical studies showed that they mimic their parent cells' regenerative and therapeutic effects and their cargo carries disease-specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Since the publication of data forms an endpoint of the study, this review specifically focused on the <i>published clinical trials</i> done with EVs. For brevity, this review was restricted to the last 10 years. Unexpectedly, the literature search showed that very few clinical trials assessing the therapeutic applications of EVs were published in this period indicating that they have not reached their desired endpoint. Conversely, most studies showed the potential of EVs present in various biofluids as a promising source of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for various diseases, and predictive markers to assess the effectiveness of therapy. This stark difference in the numbers could perhaps be due to the time-consuming regulatory processes involved in the clinical-grade preparation and characterization of EVs, and the determination of their safety and effective dose regimens. One wonders whether fast-tracking regulatory affairs could help accelerate the therapeutic use of EVs. This aspect needs urgent attention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regenerative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regenerative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460751.2024.2442847\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460751.2024.2442847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Extracellular vesicles as standard-of-care therapy: will fast-tracking the regulatory processes help achieve the goal?
Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) became a focus of clinical research when experimental and pre-clinical studies showed that they mimic their parent cells' regenerative and therapeutic effects and their cargo carries disease-specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Since the publication of data forms an endpoint of the study, this review specifically focused on the published clinical trials done with EVs. For brevity, this review was restricted to the last 10 years. Unexpectedly, the literature search showed that very few clinical trials assessing the therapeutic applications of EVs were published in this period indicating that they have not reached their desired endpoint. Conversely, most studies showed the potential of EVs present in various biofluids as a promising source of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for various diseases, and predictive markers to assess the effectiveness of therapy. This stark difference in the numbers could perhaps be due to the time-consuming regulatory processes involved in the clinical-grade preparation and characterization of EVs, and the determination of their safety and effective dose regimens. One wonders whether fast-tracking regulatory affairs could help accelerate the therapeutic use of EVs. This aspect needs urgent attention.
期刊介绍:
Regenerative medicine replaces or regenerates human cells, tissue or organs, to restore or establish normal function*. Since 2006, Regenerative Medicine has been at the forefront of publishing the very best papers and reviews covering the entire regenerative medicine sector. The journal focusses on the entire spectrum of approaches to regenerative medicine, including small molecule drugs, biologics, biomaterials and tissue engineering, and cell and gene therapies – it’s all about regeneration and not a specific platform technology. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of the sector ranging from discovery research, through to clinical development, through to commercialization. Regenerative Medicine uniquely supports this important area of biomedical science and healthcare by providing a peer-reviewed journal totally committed to publishing the very best regenerative medicine research, clinical translation and commercialization.
Regenerative Medicine provides a specialist forum to address the important challenges and advances in regenerative medicine, delivering this essential information in concise, clear and attractive article formats – vital to a rapidly growing, multidisciplinary and increasingly time-constrained community.
Despite substantial developments in our knowledge and understanding of regeneration, the field is still in its infancy. However, progress is accelerating. The next few decades will see the discovery and development of transformative therapies for patients, and in some cases, even cures. Regenerative Medicine will continue to provide a critical overview of these advances as they progress, undergo clinical trials, and eventually become mainstream medicine.