尼泊尔两个选定城市中表面健康的妇女对癌症的蔑视所涉及的社会经济因素。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301059
Bandana Paneru, Aerona Karmacharya, Soniya Makaju, Diksha Kafle, Lisasha Poudel, Sushmita Mali, Priyanka Timsina, Namuna Shrestha, Dinesh Timalsena, Kalpana Chaudhary, Niroj Bhandari, Prasanna Rai, Sunila Shakya, Donna Spiegelman, Sangini S Sheth, Anne Stangl, McKenna C Eastment, Archana Shrestha
{"title":"尼泊尔两个选定城市中表面健康的妇女对癌症的蔑视所涉及的社会经济因素。","authors":"Bandana Paneru, Aerona Karmacharya, Soniya Makaju, Diksha Kafle, Lisasha Poudel, Sushmita Mali, Priyanka Timsina, Namuna Shrestha, Dinesh Timalsena, Kalpana Chaudhary, Niroj Bhandari, Prasanna Rai, Sunila Shakya, Donna Spiegelman, Sangini S Sheth, Anne Stangl, McKenna C Eastment, Archana Shrestha","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0301059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer is the primary cause of death globally, and despite the significant advancements in treatment and survival rates, it is still stigmatized in many parts of the world. However, there is limited public health research on cancer stigma among the general female population in Nepal. Therefore, this study aims to determine the prevalence of cancer stigma and its associated factors in this group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study among 426 healthy women aged 30 to 60 years who were residents of Dhulikhel and Banepa in central Nepal. We measured cancer stigma using the Cancer Stigma Scale (CASS). CASS measures cancer stigma in six domains (awkwardness, avoidance, severity, personal responsibility, policy opposition, financial discrimination) on a 6-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to agree strongly) with higher mean stigma scores correlating with higher levels of stigma. We utilized Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with multivariable linear regression to identify the socio-demographic factors associated with the CASS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the level of cancer stigma was low, with a mean stigma score of 2.6 (0.6), but it was still present among participants. Stigma related to personal responsibility had the highest levels, with a mean score of 3.9 (1.3), followed by severity with a mean score of 3.2 (1.3), and financial discrimination with a mean score of 2.9 (1.6). There was a significant association between the mean CASS score and older age (mean difference in stigma score: 0.11 points; 95% CI: 0.02-0.20) as well as lower education (difference: -0.02 points; 95% CI: -0.03 to -0.003), after adjusting for age, ethnicity, education, marital status, religion, occupation, and parity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While overall cancer stigma was low, some domains of stigma were higher among women in a suburban area in central Nepal; thus, indicating that cancer stigma persists in this region despite its low overall prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0301059"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-economic factors associated with cancer stigma among apparently healthy women in two selected municipalities Nepal.\",\"authors\":\"Bandana Paneru, Aerona Karmacharya, Soniya Makaju, Diksha Kafle, Lisasha Poudel, Sushmita Mali, Priyanka Timsina, Namuna Shrestha, Dinesh Timalsena, Kalpana Chaudhary, Niroj Bhandari, Prasanna Rai, Sunila Shakya, Donna Spiegelman, Sangini S Sheth, Anne Stangl, McKenna C Eastment, Archana Shrestha\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0301059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer is the primary cause of death globally, and despite the significant advancements in treatment and survival rates, it is still stigmatized in many parts of the world. However, there is limited public health research on cancer stigma among the general female population in Nepal. Therefore, this study aims to determine the prevalence of cancer stigma and its associated factors in this group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study among 426 healthy women aged 30 to 60 years who were residents of Dhulikhel and Banepa in central Nepal. We measured cancer stigma using the Cancer Stigma Scale (CASS). CASS measures cancer stigma in six domains (awkwardness, avoidance, severity, personal responsibility, policy opposition, financial discrimination) on a 6-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to agree strongly) with higher mean stigma scores correlating with higher levels of stigma. We utilized Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with multivariable linear regression to identify the socio-demographic factors associated with the CASS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the level of cancer stigma was low, with a mean stigma score of 2.6 (0.6), but it was still present among participants. Stigma related to personal responsibility had the highest levels, with a mean score of 3.9 (1.3), followed by severity with a mean score of 3.2 (1.3), and financial discrimination with a mean score of 2.9 (1.6). There was a significant association between the mean CASS score and older age (mean difference in stigma score: 0.11 points; 95% CI: 0.02-0.20) as well as lower education (difference: -0.02 points; 95% CI: -0.03 to -0.003), after adjusting for age, ethnicity, education, marital status, religion, occupation, and parity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While overall cancer stigma was low, some domains of stigma were higher among women in a suburban area in central Nepal; thus, indicating that cancer stigma persists in this region despite its low overall prevalence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"e0301059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649127/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301059\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:癌症是导致全球死亡的主要原因,尽管在治疗和生存率方面取得了重大进展,但在世界许多地方,癌症仍然是一种耻辱。然而,有关尼泊尔普通女性人群中癌症耻辱感的公共卫生研究却十分有限。因此,本研究旨在确定这一群体中癌症蔑视的发生率及其相关因素:我们对尼泊尔中部 Dhulikhel 和 Banepa 的 426 名 30 至 60 岁的健康女性进行了横断面研究。我们使用癌症耻辱感量表(CASS)测量癌症耻辱感。CASS 从 6 个方面(尴尬、回避、严重程度、个人责任、政策反对、经济歧视)对癌症污名进行测量,采用李克特 6 点量表(从非常不同意到非常同意),平均污名分数越高,污名程度越高。我们利用多变量线性回归的广义估计方程(GEE)来确定与 CASS 分数相关的社会人口因素:总体而言,癌症耻辱化程度较低,平均耻辱化分数为 2.6 (0.6),但在参与者中仍然存在。与个人责任相关的成见程度最高,平均分为 3.9(1.3)分,其次是严重程度,平均分为 3.2(1.3)分,再次是经济歧视,平均分为 2.9(1.6)分。在对年龄、种族、教育程度、婚姻状况、宗教信仰、职业和奇偶性进行调整后,CASS 的平均得分与年龄较大(污名化得分的平均差异:0.11 分;95% CI:0.02-0.20)和教育程度较低(差异:-0.02 分;95% CI:-0.03 至-0.003)之间存在明显关联:虽然总体癌症耻辱感较低,但尼泊尔中部郊区妇女的某些耻辱感较高;因此,尽管总体发病率较低,但这一地区仍存在癌症耻辱感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Socio-economic factors associated with cancer stigma among apparently healthy women in two selected municipalities Nepal.

Socio-economic factors associated with cancer stigma among apparently healthy women in two selected municipalities Nepal.

Socio-economic factors associated with cancer stigma among apparently healthy women in two selected municipalities Nepal.

Socio-economic factors associated with cancer stigma among apparently healthy women in two selected municipalities Nepal.

Introduction: Cancer is the primary cause of death globally, and despite the significant advancements in treatment and survival rates, it is still stigmatized in many parts of the world. However, there is limited public health research on cancer stigma among the general female population in Nepal. Therefore, this study aims to determine the prevalence of cancer stigma and its associated factors in this group.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 426 healthy women aged 30 to 60 years who were residents of Dhulikhel and Banepa in central Nepal. We measured cancer stigma using the Cancer Stigma Scale (CASS). CASS measures cancer stigma in six domains (awkwardness, avoidance, severity, personal responsibility, policy opposition, financial discrimination) on a 6-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to agree strongly) with higher mean stigma scores correlating with higher levels of stigma. We utilized Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with multivariable linear regression to identify the socio-demographic factors associated with the CASS score.

Results: Overall, the level of cancer stigma was low, with a mean stigma score of 2.6 (0.6), but it was still present among participants. Stigma related to personal responsibility had the highest levels, with a mean score of 3.9 (1.3), followed by severity with a mean score of 3.2 (1.3), and financial discrimination with a mean score of 2.9 (1.6). There was a significant association between the mean CASS score and older age (mean difference in stigma score: 0.11 points; 95% CI: 0.02-0.20) as well as lower education (difference: -0.02 points; 95% CI: -0.03 to -0.003), after adjusting for age, ethnicity, education, marital status, religion, occupation, and parity.

Conclusion: While overall cancer stigma was low, some domains of stigma were higher among women in a suburban area in central Nepal; thus, indicating that cancer stigma persists in this region despite its low overall prevalence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信