EXPRESS:一个新的实验范式来研究基于图像的建议是如何具体化的。

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Alexandre Coutté, Benjamin Moutardier, Carole Ferrel, Sylvie Vernazza-Martin, Laure Coudrat, Vincent Dru
{"title":"EXPRESS:一个新的实验范式来研究基于图像的建议是如何具体化的。","authors":"Alexandre Coutté, Benjamin Moutardier, Carole Ferrel, Sylvie Vernazza-Martin, Laure Coudrat, Vincent Dru","doi":"10.1177/17470218241310227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated how imagery-based suggestions were embodied in perception and behaviour. In Experiment 1, participants listened to several suggestion scripts while stretching the left arm (they were required not to move). During 30 s, the script invited participants to imagine the experimenter facing them. During the following 30 s, they imagined him placing either a heavy dictionary or a light paper sheet on their hand (implicit suggestions). During the last 30 s, suggestions explicitly described how the object pushed its support down. In two other conditions, participants really performed these actions with real objects. Results showed that after implicit and explicit suggestions, the arm lowered more in the dictionary condition than in the paper sheet one. Similar patterns were observed in conditions with real objects. In Experiment 2, we used the same imagery-based suggestions but added a condition where participants imagined the dictionary placed on a table. Moreover, we measured the participants' centre of pressure (CP). Results showed that after implicit and explicit suggestions, the participants' arm lowered more in the dictionary on the arm condition than in other conditions. After implicit suggestions, CP moved more rightward in the dictionary on the arm condition than the paper sheet one. Finally, perceived difficulty was lower in the paper sheet condition than in other conditions. Regarding embodied cognition theories, results suggest that participants behaved as if the sensorimotor processes activated by mental images became integrated to the processes related to the actual situation. Further studies are needed to test whether other processes might be complementary involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218241310227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new experimental paradigm to investigate how imagery-based suggestions are embodied.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Coutté, Benjamin Moutardier, Carole Ferrel, Sylvie Vernazza-Martin, Laure Coudrat, Vincent Dru\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218241310227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated how imagery-based suggestions were embodied in perception and behaviour. In Experiment 1, participants listened to several suggestion scripts while stretching the left arm (they were required not to move). During 30 s, the script invited participants to imagine the experimenter facing them. During the following 30 s, they imagined him placing either a heavy dictionary or a light paper sheet on their hand (implicit suggestions). During the last 30 s, suggestions explicitly described how the object pushed its support down. In two other conditions, participants really performed these actions with real objects. Results showed that after implicit and explicit suggestions, the arm lowered more in the dictionary condition than in the paper sheet one. Similar patterns were observed in conditions with real objects. In Experiment 2, we used the same imagery-based suggestions but added a condition where participants imagined the dictionary placed on a table. Moreover, we measured the participants' centre of pressure (CP). Results showed that after implicit and explicit suggestions, the participants' arm lowered more in the dictionary on the arm condition than in other conditions. After implicit suggestions, CP moved more rightward in the dictionary on the arm condition than the paper sheet one. Finally, perceived difficulty was lower in the paper sheet condition than in other conditions. Regarding embodied cognition theories, results suggest that participants behaved as if the sensorimotor processes activated by mental images became integrated to the processes related to the actual situation. Further studies are needed to test whether other processes might be complementary involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218241310227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241310227\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241310227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了基于图像的建议如何体现在感知和行为中。在实验1中,参与者一边听几个建议脚本,一边伸展左臂(他们被要求不动)。在30多岁时,脚本邀请参与者想象实验者面对他们。在接下来的30年里,他们想象他把一本厚厚的字典或一张薄薄的纸放在他们手上(隐含的建议)。在过去的30年里,建议明确描述了物体是如何将其支撑向下推的。在另外两种情况下,参与者用真实的物体进行这些动作。结果表明,经内隐暗示和外显暗示后,词典条件下的手臂下降幅度大于纸张条件下的手臂下降幅度。在真实物体的条件下也观察到类似的模式。在实验2中,我们使用了相同的基于图像的建议,但增加了一个条件,让参与者想象字典放在桌子上。此外,我们测量了参与者的压力中心(CP)。结果表明,在内隐暗示和外显暗示后,手臂条件下受试者的手臂比其他条件下受试者的手臂更低。在隐性暗示后,CP在手臂条件下比在纸上条件下更向右移动。最后,纸张条件下的感知难度低于其他条件。在具身认知理论方面,研究结果表明,参与者的行为表现似乎是由心理图像激活的感觉运动过程与实际情况相关的过程融为一体。需要进一步的研究来检验是否有其他过程可能是互补的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new experimental paradigm to investigate how imagery-based suggestions are embodied.

This study investigated how imagery-based suggestions were embodied in perception and behaviour. In Experiment 1, participants listened to several suggestion scripts while stretching the left arm (they were required not to move). During 30 s, the script invited participants to imagine the experimenter facing them. During the following 30 s, they imagined him placing either a heavy dictionary or a light paper sheet on their hand (implicit suggestions). During the last 30 s, suggestions explicitly described how the object pushed its support down. In two other conditions, participants really performed these actions with real objects. Results showed that after implicit and explicit suggestions, the arm lowered more in the dictionary condition than in the paper sheet one. Similar patterns were observed in conditions with real objects. In Experiment 2, we used the same imagery-based suggestions but added a condition where participants imagined the dictionary placed on a table. Moreover, we measured the participants' centre of pressure (CP). Results showed that after implicit and explicit suggestions, the participants' arm lowered more in the dictionary on the arm condition than in other conditions. After implicit suggestions, CP moved more rightward in the dictionary on the arm condition than the paper sheet one. Finally, perceived difficulty was lower in the paper sheet condition than in other conditions. Regarding embodied cognition theories, results suggest that participants behaved as if the sensorimotor processes activated by mental images became integrated to the processes related to the actual situation. Further studies are needed to test whether other processes might be complementary involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信