在产妇和新生儿环境中实施临床实践指南的障碍和推动因素:快速审查。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0315588
Kalpana Raghunathan, Christine East, Kritika Poudel
{"title":"在产妇和新生儿环境中实施临床实践指南的障碍和推动因素:快速审查。","authors":"Kalpana Raghunathan, Christine East, Kritika Poudel","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0315588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternity and neonatal services are rapidly changing in Australia because of evolving needs of the community and patient population. Clinical practice guidelines focused on early interventions and prevention strategies can decrease risk for preventable negative health outcomes in this population. However, despite the existence of several clinical practice guidelines, their translation into practice remains problematic for healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify barriers and enablers for the implementation and adoption of clinical practice guidelines in maternal and neonatal settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid review was conducted according to Cochrane and World Health Organization guidelines. Systematic reviews, qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies related to clinical guidelines in maternal and neonatal settings published in English Language between 2010 and 2023 meeting study eligibility criteria were identified using PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Forty-eight studies originating from 35 countries were reviewed, representing practice guidelines associated with maternal and neonatal care. Identified barriers and enablers aligned to five main themes related to the contextual level of impact: (i) healthcare system and systemic factors, (ii) patient and population, (iii) guidelines and standards, (iv) organisational capacity, and (v) health professional practice.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Findings from this review shed light on the challenges and opportunities associated with introducing clinical practice guidelines in maternal and neonatal care settings. Implementation of guidelines into practice is complex, with different factors affecting their adoption and their use within healthcare settings. Addressing the multifaceted challenges associated with the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternal and neonatal care demands a comprehensive and collaborative strategy. Successful adoption of guidelines requires the involvement of stakeholders at all levels, supported by ongoing evaluation, feedback, and dedication to evidence-based practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0315588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and enablers for implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternity and neonatal settings: A rapid review.\",\"authors\":\"Kalpana Raghunathan, Christine East, Kritika Poudel\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0315588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternity and neonatal services are rapidly changing in Australia because of evolving needs of the community and patient population. Clinical practice guidelines focused on early interventions and prevention strategies can decrease risk for preventable negative health outcomes in this population. However, despite the existence of several clinical practice guidelines, their translation into practice remains problematic for healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify barriers and enablers for the implementation and adoption of clinical practice guidelines in maternal and neonatal settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid review was conducted according to Cochrane and World Health Organization guidelines. Systematic reviews, qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies related to clinical guidelines in maternal and neonatal settings published in English Language between 2010 and 2023 meeting study eligibility criteria were identified using PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Forty-eight studies originating from 35 countries were reviewed, representing practice guidelines associated with maternal and neonatal care. Identified barriers and enablers aligned to five main themes related to the contextual level of impact: (i) healthcare system and systemic factors, (ii) patient and population, (iii) guidelines and standards, (iv) organisational capacity, and (v) health professional practice.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Findings from this review shed light on the challenges and opportunities associated with introducing clinical practice guidelines in maternal and neonatal care settings. Implementation of guidelines into practice is complex, with different factors affecting their adoption and their use within healthcare settings. Addressing the multifaceted challenges associated with the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternal and neonatal care demands a comprehensive and collaborative strategy. Successful adoption of guidelines requires the involvement of stakeholders at all levels, supported by ongoing evaluation, feedback, and dedication to evidence-based practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"e0315588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649122/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315588\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于社区和患者群体的需求不断变化,澳大利亚的孕产妇和新生儿服务也在迅速改变。以早期干预和预防策略为重点的临床实践指南可以降低这一人群出现可预防的不良健康后果的风险。目的:确定在孕产妇和新生儿环境中实施和采用临床实践指南的障碍和促进因素:方法:根据 Cochrane 和世界卫生组织的指导方针进行快速综述。利用 PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库,确定了 2010 年至 2023 年期间以英语发表的、符合研究资格标准的与孕产妇和新生儿临床指南相关的系统综述、定性、定量和混合方法研究:对来自 35 个国家的 48 项研究进行了审查,这些研究代表了与孕产妇和新生儿护理相关的实践指南。已确定的障碍和促进因素与影响背景相关的五大主题一致:(i) 医疗保健系统和系统性因素,(ii) 患者和人群,(iii) 指南和标准,(iv) 组织能力,以及 (v) 医疗专业实践:本综述的研究结果阐明了在孕产妇和新生儿护理环境中引入临床实践指南所面临的挑战和机遇。将指南付诸实践是一项复杂的工作,不同的因素会影响指南的采纳以及在医疗机构中的使用。要应对在孕产妇和新生儿护理中实施临床实践指南所带来的多方面挑战,需要采取全面的合作策略。指南的成功采用需要各级利益相关者的参与,并辅以持续的评估、反馈以及对循证实践的执着追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Barriers and enablers for implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternity and neonatal settings: A rapid review.

Barriers and enablers for implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternity and neonatal settings: A rapid review.

Barriers and enablers for implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternity and neonatal settings: A rapid review.

Barriers and enablers for implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternity and neonatal settings: A rapid review.

Background: Maternity and neonatal services are rapidly changing in Australia because of evolving needs of the community and patient population. Clinical practice guidelines focused on early interventions and prevention strategies can decrease risk for preventable negative health outcomes in this population. However, despite the existence of several clinical practice guidelines, their translation into practice remains problematic for healthcare services.

Aim: To identify barriers and enablers for the implementation and adoption of clinical practice guidelines in maternal and neonatal settings.

Methods: A rapid review was conducted according to Cochrane and World Health Organization guidelines. Systematic reviews, qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies related to clinical guidelines in maternal and neonatal settings published in English Language between 2010 and 2023 meeting study eligibility criteria were identified using PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases.

Findings: Forty-eight studies originating from 35 countries were reviewed, representing practice guidelines associated with maternal and neonatal care. Identified barriers and enablers aligned to five main themes related to the contextual level of impact: (i) healthcare system and systemic factors, (ii) patient and population, (iii) guidelines and standards, (iv) organisational capacity, and (v) health professional practice.

Discussion and conclusion: Findings from this review shed light on the challenges and opportunities associated with introducing clinical practice guidelines in maternal and neonatal care settings. Implementation of guidelines into practice is complex, with different factors affecting their adoption and their use within healthcare settings. Addressing the multifaceted challenges associated with the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternal and neonatal care demands a comprehensive and collaborative strategy. Successful adoption of guidelines requires the involvement of stakeholders at all levels, supported by ongoing evaluation, feedback, and dedication to evidence-based practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信