Marina Barbosa da Silva, Domênica Baroni Coelho de Oliveira Ferreira, Cristian D Mendieta, Hamilcar Pereira da Silva, Lívia Aguiar Nogueira-Rosa, Nathalia Moraes-Figueiredo
{"title":"galcanezumab用于丛集性头痛预防治疗的有效性和安全性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Marina Barbosa da Silva, Domênica Baroni Coelho de Oliveira Ferreira, Cristian D Mendieta, Hamilcar Pereira da Silva, Lívia Aguiar Nogueira-Rosa, Nathalia Moraes-Figueiredo","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the CGRP pathway and represents the latest disease-specific and mechanism-based therapeutic option for cluster headache (CH).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for CH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies implementing galcanezumab for episodic and chronic CH. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (MOOSE) guidelines. The primary outcome was efficacy, defined by a reduction from the baseline of at least 50% in the weekly frequency of CH attacks and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 504 patients were included from 6 studies, of which 2 were RCTs. The follow-up period ranged from 3 weeks to 15 months. The mean age was 44.4 ± 10.2 years, with 24.4% female patients. Overall efficacy was 76.0% (95% CI 0.67-0.85), TEAEs were observed in 48.0% of patients (95% CI 0.25-0.72), and the most common were nasopharyngitis, local injection pain, and local injection swelling. TEAEs were, however, considerably higher within the 300 mg dose group compared with the 240 mg dose group, 80.0% (95% CI 0.65-0.87) versus 28.0% (95% CI 0.12-0.47), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that galcanezumab is effective in reducing the number of CH attacks and can be considered a safe medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"63-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for cluster headache preventive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marina Barbosa da Silva, Domênica Baroni Coelho de Oliveira Ferreira, Cristian D Mendieta, Hamilcar Pereira da Silva, Lívia Aguiar Nogueira-Rosa, Nathalia Moraes-Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the CGRP pathway and represents the latest disease-specific and mechanism-based therapeutic option for cluster headache (CH).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for CH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies implementing galcanezumab for episodic and chronic CH. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (MOOSE) guidelines. The primary outcome was efficacy, defined by a reduction from the baseline of at least 50% in the weekly frequency of CH attacks and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 504 patients were included from 6 studies, of which 2 were RCTs. The follow-up period ranged from 3 weeks to 15 months. The mean age was 44.4 ± 10.2 years, with 24.4% female patients. Overall efficacy was 76.0% (95% CI 0.67-0.85), TEAEs were observed in 48.0% of patients (95% CI 0.25-0.72), and the most common were nasopharyngitis, local injection pain, and local injection swelling. TEAEs were, however, considerably higher within the 300 mg dose group compared with the 240 mg dose group, 80.0% (95% CI 0.65-0.87) versus 28.0% (95% CI 0.12-0.47), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that galcanezumab is effective in reducing the number of CH attacks and can be considered a safe medication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"63-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Galcanezumab是一种靶向CGRP通路的单克隆抗体,是治疗丛集性头痛(CH)的最新疾病特异性和基于机制的治疗选择。目的:我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估galcanezumab治疗CH的疗效和安全性。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中使用galcanezumab治疗发作性和慢性CH的研究。我们遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)和观察性研究荟萃分析报告指南(MOOSE)指南。主要结果是疗效,由每周CH发作频率和患者总体印象改善量表(PGI-I)从基线降低至少50%来定义。次要结局包括治疗中出现的不良事件(teae)和严重不良事件(sae)。结果:6项研究共纳入504例患者,其中2项为随机对照试验。随访时间为3周到15个月。平均年龄44.4±10.2岁,女性占24.4%。总有效率为76.0% (95% CI 0.67-0.85), teae发生率为48.0% (95% CI 0.25-0.72),最常见的是鼻咽炎、局部注射痛和局部注射肿胀。然而,与240 mg剂量组相比,300 mg剂量组的teae明显更高,分别为80.0% (95% CI 0.65-0.87)和28.0% (95% CI 0.12-0.47)。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,galcanezumab可有效减少CH发作次数,可被认为是一种安全的药物。
Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for cluster headache preventive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the CGRP pathway and represents the latest disease-specific and mechanism-based therapeutic option for cluster headache (CH).
Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for CH.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies implementing galcanezumab for episodic and chronic CH. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (MOOSE) guidelines. The primary outcome was efficacy, defined by a reduction from the baseline of at least 50% in the weekly frequency of CH attacks and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
Results: A total of 504 patients were included from 6 studies, of which 2 were RCTs. The follow-up period ranged from 3 weeks to 15 months. The mean age was 44.4 ± 10.2 years, with 24.4% female patients. Overall efficacy was 76.0% (95% CI 0.67-0.85), TEAEs were observed in 48.0% of patients (95% CI 0.25-0.72), and the most common were nasopharyngitis, local injection pain, and local injection swelling. TEAEs were, however, considerably higher within the 300 mg dose group compared with the 240 mg dose group, 80.0% (95% CI 0.65-0.87) versus 28.0% (95% CI 0.12-0.47), respectively.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that galcanezumab is effective in reducing the number of CH attacks and can be considered a safe medication.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields.
The scope of the journal includes:
•Stem cell applications
•Molecular neuroscience
•Neuropharmacology
•Neuroradiology
•Neurochemistry
•Biomathematical models
•Endovascular neurosurgery
•Innovation in neurosurgery.