cenobamate对荷兰耐药局灶性癫痫患者的预算影响分析。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338
Nannan Li, Marian Majoie, Silvia Evers, Kim Rijkers, Felix Gubler, Rob Rouhl, Richard Lazeron, Pim Klarenbeek, Vicki Laskier-Owens, Mickaël Hiligsmann
{"title":"cenobamate对荷兰耐药局灶性癫痫患者的预算影响分析。","authors":"Nannan Li, Marian Majoie, Silvia Evers, Kim Rijkers, Felix Gubler, Rob Rouhl, Richard Lazeron, Pim Klarenbeek, Vicki Laskier-Owens, Mickaël Hiligsmann","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to explore the financial consequences of adopting cenobamate as a treatment alternative in epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures (FOS) from a societal perspective in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previous budget impact model with a 5-year time horizon was adapted to the Dutch setting accounting for the eligible population, real-world market shares, treatment effectiveness and resource use in two scenarios: cenobamate with constant market share versus cenobamate with linearly increased market share up to 20%. Clinical inputs included treatment response, seizure reduction and adverse events. Costs consisted of drugs, medical and non-medical costs. One-way sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to test the robustness of our results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14,723 patients were eligible for cenobamate in 2022. Although cenobamate adds a gross budget impact of €12,686,30, the displacement of other drugs yields a total impact on the drug budget of €3,722,596 over 5 years. Adopting cenobamate resulted in a medical cost savings of €13,499,498 due to less resource use, and non-medical cost savings of €22,144,054 due to reduced productivity losses. Overall, savings generated at medical and non-medical cost level offset the gross drug budget impact of cenobamate, resulting in a saving of €31,920,955 over 5 years. Results were robust in the sensitivity/scenario analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with cenobamate is associated with both medical and non-medical cost savings, which offset the increase in drug budget and result in a significant potential budget saving. The higher the market share of cenobamate, the larger the budget savings. We acknowledge several limitations; Complex scenarios such as drug interactions, stopping/switching drugs, and multiple drug use were not taken into account. The long-term efficacy and safety of cenobamate and its comparators remains uncertain. Future real-world data are needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"114-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Budget impact analysis of cenobamate for epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures in the Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"Nannan Li, Marian Majoie, Silvia Evers, Kim Rijkers, Felix Gubler, Rob Rouhl, Richard Lazeron, Pim Klarenbeek, Vicki Laskier-Owens, Mickaël Hiligsmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to explore the financial consequences of adopting cenobamate as a treatment alternative in epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures (FOS) from a societal perspective in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previous budget impact model with a 5-year time horizon was adapted to the Dutch setting accounting for the eligible population, real-world market shares, treatment effectiveness and resource use in two scenarios: cenobamate with constant market share versus cenobamate with linearly increased market share up to 20%. Clinical inputs included treatment response, seizure reduction and adverse events. Costs consisted of drugs, medical and non-medical costs. One-way sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to test the robustness of our results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14,723 patients were eligible for cenobamate in 2022. Although cenobamate adds a gross budget impact of €12,686,30, the displacement of other drugs yields a total impact on the drug budget of €3,722,596 over 5 years. Adopting cenobamate resulted in a medical cost savings of €13,499,498 due to less resource use, and non-medical cost savings of €22,144,054 due to reduced productivity losses. Overall, savings generated at medical and non-medical cost level offset the gross drug budget impact of cenobamate, resulting in a saving of €31,920,955 over 5 years. Results were robust in the sensitivity/scenario analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with cenobamate is associated with both medical and non-medical cost savings, which offset the increase in drug budget and result in a significant potential budget saving. The higher the market share of cenobamate, the larger the budget savings. We acknowledge several limitations; Complex scenarios such as drug interactions, stopping/switching drugs, and multiple drug use were not taken into account. The long-term efficacy and safety of cenobamate and its comparators remains uncertain. Future real-world data are needed to confirm our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"114-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是从荷兰的社会角度探讨采用cenobamate作为耐药局灶性发作(FOS)癫痫患者的替代治疗方案的经济后果。方法:将先前的预算影响模型(5年时间范围)调整为荷兰设置,考虑了两种情况下的符合条件的人口、现实世界的市场份额、治疗效果和资源利用:市场份额恒定的cenobamate与市场份额线性增长至20%的cenobamate。临床输入包括治疗反应、癫痫发作减少和不良事件。费用包括药品、医疗和非医疗费用。通过单向敏感性分析和情景分析来检验结果的稳健性。结果:2022年有14723例患者符合cenobamate的条件。尽管cenobamate增加了12,686,30欧元的总预算影响,但其他药物的替代在5年内对药物预算的总影响为3,722,596欧元。采用cenobamate后,由于减少了资源使用,节省了13 499 498欧元的医疗费用,由于减少了生产力损失,节省了22 144 054欧元的非医疗费用。总的来说,医疗和非医疗费用方面的节余抵消了cenobamate对药品预算总额的影响,5年内节余31,920 955欧元。敏感性/情景分析的结果是稳健的。结论:使用cenobamate治疗与医疗和非医疗成本节约相关,抵消了药物预算的增加,并导致显著的潜在预算节约。奥巴马的市场份额越高,节省的预算就越大。我们承认一些局限性;药物相互作用、停药/切换药物和多种药物使用等复杂情况未被考虑在内。cenobamate及其比较药的长期疗效和安全性仍不确定。需要未来的真实世界数据来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Budget impact analysis of cenobamate for epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures in the Netherlands.

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the financial consequences of adopting cenobamate as a treatment alternative in epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures (FOS) from a societal perspective in the Netherlands.

Methods: A previous budget impact model with a 5-year time horizon was adapted to the Dutch setting accounting for the eligible population, real-world market shares, treatment effectiveness and resource use in two scenarios: cenobamate with constant market share versus cenobamate with linearly increased market share up to 20%. Clinical inputs included treatment response, seizure reduction and adverse events. Costs consisted of drugs, medical and non-medical costs. One-way sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to test the robustness of our results.

Results: 14,723 patients were eligible for cenobamate in 2022. Although cenobamate adds a gross budget impact of €12,686,30, the displacement of other drugs yields a total impact on the drug budget of €3,722,596 over 5 years. Adopting cenobamate resulted in a medical cost savings of €13,499,498 due to less resource use, and non-medical cost savings of €22,144,054 due to reduced productivity losses. Overall, savings generated at medical and non-medical cost level offset the gross drug budget impact of cenobamate, resulting in a saving of €31,920,955 over 5 years. Results were robust in the sensitivity/scenario analyses.

Conclusion: Treatment with cenobamate is associated with both medical and non-medical cost savings, which offset the increase in drug budget and result in a significant potential budget saving. The higher the market share of cenobamate, the larger the budget savings. We acknowledge several limitations; Complex scenarios such as drug interactions, stopping/switching drugs, and multiple drug use were not taken into account. The long-term efficacy and safety of cenobamate and its comparators remains uncertain. Future real-world data are needed to confirm our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信