{"title":"优化理论在多发性硬化症患者中的临床应用:一项概念验证研究及其对康复实践的影响。","authors":"Zahra Khalaji, Hamid Salehi, Maryam Nezakat Alhosseini, Rebecca Lewthwaite, Gabriele Wulf","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the potential to improve motor learning and performance in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) with OPTIMAL theory conditions. OPTIMAL theory predicts that three main factors [i.e. autonomy support (AS), enhanced expectancies (EE), and external focus (EF)] facilitate performance and learning. We examined whether the implementation of all three combined in a consecutive manner during practice would be beneficial for the motor learning and performance in a clinical population facing physical, cognitive, and emotional challenges. Thirty PwMS with mild-to-moderate disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale = 2.0-5.0) were randomly assigned to one of two groups (optimized and control) and practiced a novel motor-cognitive task involving rapid square-stepping to memorized patterns. Following a pretest (no group difference), optimized group participants practiced under each of three factors across practice phase (EE: feedback after good trials; AS: choice of mat color; and EF: external focus to the mat). Control group participants practiced under neutral conditions. The optimized group had significantly shorter movement times than the control group in the practice phase [174.7 (27.4) s vs. 236.8 (35.8) s, P < 0.0001], on the 24-h retention test [69.3 (9.3) s vs. 159.7 (15.5) s, P < 0.0001], and the 24-h transfer test [146.1 (14.9) s vs. 223.1 (38.9) s, P < 0.0001]. Thus, optimized practice combining AS, EF, and EE enhanced motor skill learning. Key factors in the OPTIMAL theory can be used to improve patients' motor learning. Further studies are warranted to extend these proof-of-concept observations for potential clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":" ","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical examination of OPTIMAL theory application in people with multiple sclerosis: a proof-of-concept study and implications for rehabilitation practice.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Khalaji, Hamid Salehi, Maryam Nezakat Alhosseini, Rebecca Lewthwaite, Gabriele Wulf\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated the potential to improve motor learning and performance in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) with OPTIMAL theory conditions. OPTIMAL theory predicts that three main factors [i.e. autonomy support (AS), enhanced expectancies (EE), and external focus (EF)] facilitate performance and learning. We examined whether the implementation of all three combined in a consecutive manner during practice would be beneficial for the motor learning and performance in a clinical population facing physical, cognitive, and emotional challenges. Thirty PwMS with mild-to-moderate disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale = 2.0-5.0) were randomly assigned to one of two groups (optimized and control) and practiced a novel motor-cognitive task involving rapid square-stepping to memorized patterns. Following a pretest (no group difference), optimized group participants practiced under each of three factors across practice phase (EE: feedback after good trials; AS: choice of mat color; and EF: external focus to the mat). Control group participants practiced under neutral conditions. The optimized group had significantly shorter movement times than the control group in the practice phase [174.7 (27.4) s vs. 236.8 (35.8) s, P < 0.0001], on the 24-h retention test [69.3 (9.3) s vs. 159.7 (15.5) s, P < 0.0001], and the 24-h transfer test [146.1 (14.9) s vs. 223.1 (38.9) s, P < 0.0001]. Thus, optimized practice combining AS, EF, and EE enhanced motor skill learning. Key factors in the OPTIMAL theory can be used to improve patients' motor learning. Further studies are warranted to extend these proof-of-concept observations for potential clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000653\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们研究了在优化理论条件下改善多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者运动学习和表现的潜力。最优理论预测,三个主要因素[即自主支持(AS),增强期望(EE)和外部焦点(EF)]促进绩效和学习。我们研究了在实践中以连续的方式实施这三种方法是否对面临身体、认知和情感挑战的临床人群的运动学习和表现有益。30名轻度至中度残疾的PwMS(扩展残疾状态量表= 2.0-5.0)被随机分为两组(优化组和对照组),并练习一项新的运动认知任务,包括快速方步到记忆模式。在前测之后(无组间差异),优化组参与者在练习阶段分别在三个因素下进行练习(EE:良好试验后的反馈;AS:席子颜色的选择;EF:对垫子的外部聚焦)。对照组参与者在中性条件下进行练习。优化组在练习阶段的运动时间明显短于对照组[174.7 (27.4)s比236.8 (35.8)s, P < 0.0001],在24 h保持测试中[69.3 (9.3)s比159.7 (15.5)s, P < 0.0001],在24 h转移测试中[146.1 (14.9)s比223.1 (38.9)s, P < 0.0001]。因此,结合AS、EF和EE的优化练习增强了运动技能的学习。优化理论中的关键因素可用于改善患者的运动学习。进一步的研究是必要的,以扩大这些概念验证观察潜在的临床应用。
A clinical examination of OPTIMAL theory application in people with multiple sclerosis: a proof-of-concept study and implications for rehabilitation practice.
We investigated the potential to improve motor learning and performance in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) with OPTIMAL theory conditions. OPTIMAL theory predicts that three main factors [i.e. autonomy support (AS), enhanced expectancies (EE), and external focus (EF)] facilitate performance and learning. We examined whether the implementation of all three combined in a consecutive manner during practice would be beneficial for the motor learning and performance in a clinical population facing physical, cognitive, and emotional challenges. Thirty PwMS with mild-to-moderate disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale = 2.0-5.0) were randomly assigned to one of two groups (optimized and control) and practiced a novel motor-cognitive task involving rapid square-stepping to memorized patterns. Following a pretest (no group difference), optimized group participants practiced under each of three factors across practice phase (EE: feedback after good trials; AS: choice of mat color; and EF: external focus to the mat). Control group participants practiced under neutral conditions. The optimized group had significantly shorter movement times than the control group in the practice phase [174.7 (27.4) s vs. 236.8 (35.8) s, P < 0.0001], on the 24-h retention test [69.3 (9.3) s vs. 159.7 (15.5) s, P < 0.0001], and the 24-h transfer test [146.1 (14.9) s vs. 223.1 (38.9) s, P < 0.0001]. Thus, optimized practice combining AS, EF, and EE enhanced motor skill learning. Key factors in the OPTIMAL theory can be used to improve patients' motor learning. Further studies are warranted to extend these proof-of-concept observations for potential clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.