{"title":"胚胎移植当天血清孕酮水平不是整倍体囊胚移植冻融胚胎移植结果的可靠预测指标:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Wenjun Chen, Yiyao Xu, Xinyan Liu, Jiafu Pan, Bing Cai, Canquan Zhou, Yanwen Xu, Fang Gu","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate whether serum progesterone (P4) levels on embryo transfer (ET) day correlate with the likelihood of live birth in artificial frozen–thawed transfer cycles using intramuscular progesterone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University-affiliated hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing single euploid blastocyst transfer after preimplantation genetic testing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Live birth rate (LBR) was calculated in each percentile of serum P4 to detect a threshold associated with an increased probability of LB. The association between serum P4 and pregnancy outcomes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>LBR was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and early pregnancy loss (EPL) rate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 761 patients were included, and the overall LBR was 55.72%. For LBR, each percentile group of serum P4 did not significantly differ. The distributions of P4 were comparable between the LB and non-LB groups, with an average of 12.62 ± 4.05 and 12.84 ± 4.39 ng/mL, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that serum P4 did not affect the LBR, whereas the day of the blastocyst (D5 vs. D6: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–3.03) and embryo quality (good vs. viable embryo: aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.37–2.58) were independently associated with LBR. Similarly, serum P4 was not associated with CPR and EPL rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Serum P4 levels on ET day do not predict LBR in artificial cycles with intramuscular progesterone.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S2","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serum Progesterone Level on the Day of Embryo Transfer Is Not a Reliable Predictor for Frozen–Thawed Embryo Transfer Outcomes With Euploid Blastocyst Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Wenjun Chen, Yiyao Xu, Xinyan Liu, Jiafu Pan, Bing Cai, Canquan Zhou, Yanwen Xu, Fang Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.18045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate whether serum progesterone (P4) levels on embryo transfer (ET) day correlate with the likelihood of live birth in artificial frozen–thawed transfer cycles using intramuscular progesterone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>University-affiliated hospital.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients undergoing single euploid blastocyst transfer after preimplantation genetic testing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Live birth rate (LBR) was calculated in each percentile of serum P4 to detect a threshold associated with an increased probability of LB. The association between serum P4 and pregnancy outcomes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>LBR was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and early pregnancy loss (EPL) rate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 761 patients were included, and the overall LBR was 55.72%. For LBR, each percentile group of serum P4 did not significantly differ. The distributions of P4 were comparable between the LB and non-LB groups, with an average of 12.62 ± 4.05 and 12.84 ± 4.39 ng/mL, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that serum P4 did not affect the LBR, whereas the day of the blastocyst (D5 vs. D6: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–3.03) and embryo quality (good vs. viable embryo: aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.37–2.58) were independently associated with LBR. Similarly, serum P4 was not associated with CPR and EPL rates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Serum P4 levels on ET day do not predict LBR in artificial cycles with intramuscular progesterone.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 S2\",\"pages\":\"53-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18045\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Serum Progesterone Level on the Day of Embryo Transfer Is Not a Reliable Predictor for Frozen–Thawed Embryo Transfer Outcomes With Euploid Blastocyst Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Objective
To investigate whether serum progesterone (P4) levels on embryo transfer (ET) day correlate with the likelihood of live birth in artificial frozen–thawed transfer cycles using intramuscular progesterone.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
University-affiliated hospital.
Population
Patients undergoing single euploid blastocyst transfer after preimplantation genetic testing.
Methods
Live birth rate (LBR) was calculated in each percentile of serum P4 to detect a threshold associated with an increased probability of LB. The association between serum P4 and pregnancy outcomes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Main Outcome Measures
LBR was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and early pregnancy loss (EPL) rate.
Results
In total, 761 patients were included, and the overall LBR was 55.72%. For LBR, each percentile group of serum P4 did not significantly differ. The distributions of P4 were comparable between the LB and non-LB groups, with an average of 12.62 ± 4.05 and 12.84 ± 4.39 ng/mL, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that serum P4 did not affect the LBR, whereas the day of the blastocyst (D5 vs. D6: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–3.03) and embryo quality (good vs. viable embryo: aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.37–2.58) were independently associated with LBR. Similarly, serum P4 was not associated with CPR and EPL rates.
Conclusions
Serum P4 levels on ET day do not predict LBR in artificial cycles with intramuscular progesterone.
期刊介绍:
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.