Jeet Majumdar, Soham Mandal, Ananth Govind Rajan, Prabal K. Maiti
{"title":"扭曲二维材料中封闭水的结构相似但热力学、介电和摩擦特性不同:MoS2 与石墨烯","authors":"Jeet Majumdar, Soham Mandal, Ananth Govind Rajan, Prabal K. Maiti","doi":"10.1039/d4nr03821e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water-based nanofluidic devices, where water is confined in Angstrom scale nanochannels, are widely encountered in nanotechnology. Although it is known that the material of confinement has a significant influence on the properties of confined water, much less is known of the relationship between the structure of nanoconfined water and its properties, impacting the design of nanofluidic devices. We explore the behavior of a confined water monolayer within a bilayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small>) structure, comparing its behavior with that within bilayer graphene. We find that only ∼2% of the entire structure has nearly perfect square order and the rest is filled with rhombus ordering. Surprisingly, we find that although the structure of monolayer confined water remains the same in both the 2D materials, thermodynamic analysis shows that confined water has a more favorable potential environment in MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small> than graphene for all twists explored here. However, with increasing twist angle, the encapsulating effect of water diminishes slightly in the case of graphene than MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small>. Interestingly, the dielectric constant is anomalously lower in MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small> by ∼22% compared to the confined water dielectric constant in a graphene nanochannel. Finally, we show that the static friction coefficient of confined water in bilayer MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small> does not change with twist. However, unlike graphene, it does not show an order of magnitude reduction due to this extreme confinement. Overall, we show, counter-intuitively, that although confined water structures are similar in different 2D materials considered here, there exist differences in other properties of this structured water.","PeriodicalId":92,"journal":{"name":"Nanoscale","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Similar structure but different thermodynamic, dielectric, and frictional properties of confined water in twisted 2D materials: MoS2 vs. graphene\",\"authors\":\"Jeet Majumdar, Soham Mandal, Ananth Govind Rajan, Prabal K. Maiti\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d4nr03821e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Water-based nanofluidic devices, where water is confined in Angstrom scale nanochannels, are widely encountered in nanotechnology. Although it is known that the material of confinement has a significant influence on the properties of confined water, much less is known of the relationship between the structure of nanoconfined water and its properties, impacting the design of nanofluidic devices. We explore the behavior of a confined water monolayer within a bilayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small>) structure, comparing its behavior with that within bilayer graphene. We find that only ∼2% of the entire structure has nearly perfect square order and the rest is filled with rhombus ordering. Surprisingly, we find that although the structure of monolayer confined water remains the same in both the 2D materials, thermodynamic analysis shows that confined water has a more favorable potential environment in MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small> than graphene for all twists explored here. However, with increasing twist angle, the encapsulating effect of water diminishes slightly in the case of graphene than MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small>. Interestingly, the dielectric constant is anomalously lower in MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small> by ∼22% compared to the confined water dielectric constant in a graphene nanochannel. Finally, we show that the static friction coefficient of confined water in bilayer MoS<small><sub>2</sub></small> does not change with twist. However, unlike graphene, it does not show an order of magnitude reduction due to this extreme confinement. Overall, we show, counter-intuitively, that although confined water structures are similar in different 2D materials considered here, there exist differences in other properties of this structured water.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nanoscale\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nanoscale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nr03821e\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanoscale","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nr03821e","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Similar structure but different thermodynamic, dielectric, and frictional properties of confined water in twisted 2D materials: MoS2 vs. graphene
Water-based nanofluidic devices, where water is confined in Angstrom scale nanochannels, are widely encountered in nanotechnology. Although it is known that the material of confinement has a significant influence on the properties of confined water, much less is known of the relationship between the structure of nanoconfined water and its properties, impacting the design of nanofluidic devices. We explore the behavior of a confined water monolayer within a bilayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) structure, comparing its behavior with that within bilayer graphene. We find that only ∼2% of the entire structure has nearly perfect square order and the rest is filled with rhombus ordering. Surprisingly, we find that although the structure of monolayer confined water remains the same in both the 2D materials, thermodynamic analysis shows that confined water has a more favorable potential environment in MoS2 than graphene for all twists explored here. However, with increasing twist angle, the encapsulating effect of water diminishes slightly in the case of graphene than MoS2. Interestingly, the dielectric constant is anomalously lower in MoS2 by ∼22% compared to the confined water dielectric constant in a graphene nanochannel. Finally, we show that the static friction coefficient of confined water in bilayer MoS2 does not change with twist. However, unlike graphene, it does not show an order of magnitude reduction due to this extreme confinement. Overall, we show, counter-intuitively, that although confined water structures are similar in different 2D materials considered here, there exist differences in other properties of this structured water.
期刊介绍:
Nanoscale is a high-impact international journal, publishing high-quality research across nanoscience and nanotechnology. Nanoscale publishes a full mix of research articles on experimental and theoretical work, including reviews, communications, and full papers.Highly interdisciplinary, this journal appeals to scientists, researchers and professionals interested in nanoscience and nanotechnology, quantum materials and quantum technology, including the areas of physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, materials, energy/environment, information technology, detection science, healthcare and drug discovery, and electronics.