解耦硫化物固态电池中的第一周期容量损失机制

IF 32.4 1区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Emma Kaeli, Zhelong Jiang, Xiaomian Yang, Emma Patricia Kwai Lin Choy, Nicolas Bojun Liang, Edward Barks, Sunny Wang, Stephen Dongmin Kang, William C. Chueh
{"title":"解耦硫化物固态电池中的第一周期容量损失机制","authors":"Emma Kaeli, Zhelong Jiang, Xiaomian Yang, Emma Patricia Kwai Lin Choy, Nicolas Bojun Liang, Edward Barks, Sunny Wang, Stephen Dongmin Kang, William C. Chueh","doi":"10.1039/d4ee04908j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solid-state batteries (SSBs) promise more energy-dense storage than liquid electrolyte lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, first-cycle capacity loss is higher in SSBs than in LIBs due to interfacial reactions. The chemical evolution of key interfaces in SSBs has been extensively characterized. Electrochemically, however, we lack a versatile strategy for quantifying the reversibility of solid electrolyte (SE) redox for established and next-generation SSB electrolytes. In this work, we perform tailored electrochemical tests and <em>operando</em> X-ray diffraction to disentangle reversible and irreversible sources of capacity loss in positive electrodes composed of Li<small><sub>6</sub></small>PS<small><sub>5</sub></small>Cl SE, Li(Ni<small><sub>0.5</sub></small>Mn<small><sub>0.3</sub></small>Co<small><sub>0.2</sub></small>)O<small><sub>2</sub></small> (NMC), and carbon conductive additives. We leverage an atypically low voltage cutoff (2.0 V vs. Li/Li<small><sup>+</sup></small>) to quantify the reversibility of SE redox. Using slow (5.5 mA g<small><sub>NMC</sub></small><small><sup>-1</sup></small>) cycling paired with &gt; 100 h low-voltage holds, our cells achieve a surprising 96.2% first-cycle Coulombic efficiency, which is higher than previously reported (mean: 72%, maximum: 91.6% across surveyed literature). We clarify that sluggish NMC relithiation kinetics have been historically mistaken for permanently irreversible capacity loss. Through systematic decoupling of loss mechanisms, we uncover the unexpected reversibility of SE redox and isolate the major contributors to capacity loss, outlining a strategy for an accurate assessment of next-generation SE materials and interface modifications.","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":32.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoupling First-Cycle Capacity Loss Mechanisms in Sulfide Solid-State Batteries\",\"authors\":\"Emma Kaeli, Zhelong Jiang, Xiaomian Yang, Emma Patricia Kwai Lin Choy, Nicolas Bojun Liang, Edward Barks, Sunny Wang, Stephen Dongmin Kang, William C. Chueh\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d4ee04908j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Solid-state batteries (SSBs) promise more energy-dense storage than liquid electrolyte lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, first-cycle capacity loss is higher in SSBs than in LIBs due to interfacial reactions. The chemical evolution of key interfaces in SSBs has been extensively characterized. Electrochemically, however, we lack a versatile strategy for quantifying the reversibility of solid electrolyte (SE) redox for established and next-generation SSB electrolytes. In this work, we perform tailored electrochemical tests and <em>operando</em> X-ray diffraction to disentangle reversible and irreversible sources of capacity loss in positive electrodes composed of Li<small><sub>6</sub></small>PS<small><sub>5</sub></small>Cl SE, Li(Ni<small><sub>0.5</sub></small>Mn<small><sub>0.3</sub></small>Co<small><sub>0.2</sub></small>)O<small><sub>2</sub></small> (NMC), and carbon conductive additives. We leverage an atypically low voltage cutoff (2.0 V vs. Li/Li<small><sup>+</sup></small>) to quantify the reversibility of SE redox. Using slow (5.5 mA g<small><sub>NMC</sub></small><small><sup>-1</sup></small>) cycling paired with &gt; 100 h low-voltage holds, our cells achieve a surprising 96.2% first-cycle Coulombic efficiency, which is higher than previously reported (mean: 72%, maximum: 91.6% across surveyed literature). We clarify that sluggish NMC relithiation kinetics have been historically mistaken for permanently irreversible capacity loss. Through systematic decoupling of loss mechanisms, we uncover the unexpected reversibility of SE redox and isolate the major contributors to capacity loss, outlining a strategy for an accurate assessment of next-generation SE materials and interface modifications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":32.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee04908j\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee04908j","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decoupling First-Cycle Capacity Loss Mechanisms in Sulfide Solid-State Batteries
Solid-state batteries (SSBs) promise more energy-dense storage than liquid electrolyte lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, first-cycle capacity loss is higher in SSBs than in LIBs due to interfacial reactions. The chemical evolution of key interfaces in SSBs has been extensively characterized. Electrochemically, however, we lack a versatile strategy for quantifying the reversibility of solid electrolyte (SE) redox for established and next-generation SSB electrolytes. In this work, we perform tailored electrochemical tests and operando X-ray diffraction to disentangle reversible and irreversible sources of capacity loss in positive electrodes composed of Li6PS5Cl SE, Li(Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2)O2 (NMC), and carbon conductive additives. We leverage an atypically low voltage cutoff (2.0 V vs. Li/Li+) to quantify the reversibility of SE redox. Using slow (5.5 mA gNMC-1) cycling paired with > 100 h low-voltage holds, our cells achieve a surprising 96.2% first-cycle Coulombic efficiency, which is higher than previously reported (mean: 72%, maximum: 91.6% across surveyed literature). We clarify that sluggish NMC relithiation kinetics have been historically mistaken for permanently irreversible capacity loss. Through systematic decoupling of loss mechanisms, we uncover the unexpected reversibility of SE redox and isolate the major contributors to capacity loss, outlining a strategy for an accurate assessment of next-generation SE materials and interface modifications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Environmental Science
Energy & Environmental Science 化学-工程:化工
CiteScore
50.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
349
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences." Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信