Keyhan Najafian, Benjamin Rehany, Alexander Nowakowski, Saba Ghazimoghadam, Kevin Pierre, Rita Zakarian, Tariq Al-Saadi, Caroline Reinhold, Abbas Babajani-Feremi, Joshua K Wong, Marie-Christine Guiot, Marie-Constance Lacasse, Stephanie Lam, Peter M Siegel, Kevin Petrecca, Matthew Dankner, Reza Forghani
{"title":"脑磁共振成像扫描的脑转移侵袭模式的机器学习预测。","authors":"Keyhan Najafian, Benjamin Rehany, Alexander Nowakowski, Saba Ghazimoghadam, Kevin Pierre, Rita Zakarian, Tariq Al-Saadi, Caroline Reinhold, Abbas Babajani-Feremi, Joshua K Wong, Marie-Christine Guiot, Marie-Constance Lacasse, Stephanie Lam, Peter M Siegel, Kevin Petrecca, Matthew Dankner, Reza Forghani","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain metastasis invasion pattern (BMIP) is an emerging biomarker associated with recurrence-free and overall survival in patients, and differential response to therapy in preclinical models. Currently, BMIP can only be determined from the histopathological examination of surgical specimens, precluding its use as a biomarker prior to therapy initiation. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of machine learning (ML) approaches to develop a noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based biomarker for BMIP determination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From an initial cohort of 329 patients, a subset of 132 patients met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study. We evaluated the ability of an expert neuroradiologist to reliably predict BMIP. Thereafter, the dataset was randomly divided into training/validation (80% of cases) and test subsets (20% of cases). The ground truth for BMIP was the histopathologic evaluation of resected specimens. Following MRI sequence co-registration, advanced feature extraction techniques deriving hand-crafted radiomic features with traditional ML classifiers and convolution-based deep learning (CDL) models were trained and evaluated. Different ML approaches were used individually or using ensembling techniques to determine the model with the best performance for BMIP prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expert evaluation of brain MRI scans could not reliably predict BMIP, with an accuracy of 44%-59% depending on the semantic feature used. Among the different ML and CDL models evaluated, the best-performing model achieved an accuracy of 85% and an F1 score of 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML approaches can effectively predict BMIP, representing a noninvasive MRI-based approach to guide the management of patients with brain metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"6 1","pages":"vdae200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning prediction of brain metastasis invasion pattern on brain magnetic resonance imaging scans.\",\"authors\":\"Keyhan Najafian, Benjamin Rehany, Alexander Nowakowski, Saba Ghazimoghadam, Kevin Pierre, Rita Zakarian, Tariq Al-Saadi, Caroline Reinhold, Abbas Babajani-Feremi, Joshua K Wong, Marie-Christine Guiot, Marie-Constance Lacasse, Stephanie Lam, Peter M Siegel, Kevin Petrecca, Matthew Dankner, Reza Forghani\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdae200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain metastasis invasion pattern (BMIP) is an emerging biomarker associated with recurrence-free and overall survival in patients, and differential response to therapy in preclinical models. Currently, BMIP can only be determined from the histopathological examination of surgical specimens, precluding its use as a biomarker prior to therapy initiation. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of machine learning (ML) approaches to develop a noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based biomarker for BMIP determination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From an initial cohort of 329 patients, a subset of 132 patients met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study. We evaluated the ability of an expert neuroradiologist to reliably predict BMIP. Thereafter, the dataset was randomly divided into training/validation (80% of cases) and test subsets (20% of cases). The ground truth for BMIP was the histopathologic evaluation of resected specimens. Following MRI sequence co-registration, advanced feature extraction techniques deriving hand-crafted radiomic features with traditional ML classifiers and convolution-based deep learning (CDL) models were trained and evaluated. Different ML approaches were used individually or using ensembling techniques to determine the model with the best performance for BMIP prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expert evaluation of brain MRI scans could not reliably predict BMIP, with an accuracy of 44%-59% depending on the semantic feature used. Among the different ML and CDL models evaluated, the best-performing model achieved an accuracy of 85% and an F1 score of 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML approaches can effectively predict BMIP, representing a noninvasive MRI-based approach to guide the management of patients with brain metastases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"vdae200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639946/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:脑转移侵袭模式(BMIP)是一种新兴的生物标志物,它与患者的无复发生存率和总生存率以及临床前模型对治疗的不同反应相关。目前,BMIP只能通过手术标本的组织病理学检查来确定,因此无法在开始治疗前将其用作生物标志物。本研究旨在研究机器学习(ML)方法的潜力,以开发一种基于磁共振成像(MRI)的无创生物标记物,用于确定BMIP:在最初的 329 例患者中,有 132 例患者符合这项回顾性研究的纳入标准。我们评估了神经放射专家可靠预测 BMIP 的能力。之后,数据集被随机分为训练/验证子集(80% 的病例)和测试子集(20% 的病例)。BMIP 的基本事实是切除标本的组织病理学评估。在核磁共振成像序列共配准之后,通过传统的 ML 分类器和基于卷积的深度学习(CDL)模型训练和评估了先进的特征提取技术,这些特征提取技术可得出手工创建的放射学特征。对不同的 ML 方法单独使用或使用集合技术,以确定 BMIP 预测性能最佳的模型:专家对脑磁共振成像扫描的评估无法可靠地预测 BMIP,准确率为 44%-59%,具体取决于所使用的语义特征。在评估的不同 ML 和 CDL 模型中,表现最好的模型准确率达到 85%,F1 分数达到 90%:ML方法可有效预测BMIP,是一种基于磁共振成像的无创方法,可指导脑转移患者的治疗。
Machine learning prediction of brain metastasis invasion pattern on brain magnetic resonance imaging scans.
Background: Brain metastasis invasion pattern (BMIP) is an emerging biomarker associated with recurrence-free and overall survival in patients, and differential response to therapy in preclinical models. Currently, BMIP can only be determined from the histopathological examination of surgical specimens, precluding its use as a biomarker prior to therapy initiation. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of machine learning (ML) approaches to develop a noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based biomarker for BMIP determination.
Methods: From an initial cohort of 329 patients, a subset of 132 patients met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study. We evaluated the ability of an expert neuroradiologist to reliably predict BMIP. Thereafter, the dataset was randomly divided into training/validation (80% of cases) and test subsets (20% of cases). The ground truth for BMIP was the histopathologic evaluation of resected specimens. Following MRI sequence co-registration, advanced feature extraction techniques deriving hand-crafted radiomic features with traditional ML classifiers and convolution-based deep learning (CDL) models were trained and evaluated. Different ML approaches were used individually or using ensembling techniques to determine the model with the best performance for BMIP prediction.
Results: Expert evaluation of brain MRI scans could not reliably predict BMIP, with an accuracy of 44%-59% depending on the semantic feature used. Among the different ML and CDL models evaluated, the best-performing model achieved an accuracy of 85% and an F1 score of 90%.
Conclusions: ML approaches can effectively predict BMIP, representing a noninvasive MRI-based approach to guide the management of patients with brain metastases.