开发三维主动运动范围分辨仪器,用于测试踝关节在跖屈时的本体感觉。

Yilin Zhao, Tongzhou Zhang, Shuhui Wang, Roger Adams, Gordon Waddington, Jia Han
{"title":"开发三维主动运动范围分辨仪器,用于测试踝关节在跖屈时的本体感觉。","authors":"Yilin Zhao,&nbsp;Tongzhou Zhang,&nbsp;Shuhui Wang,&nbsp;Roger Adams,&nbsp;Gordon Waddington,&nbsp;Jia Han","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Proprioception plays an important role in joint stability, and ankle sprains usually happen involving plantarflexion, internal rotation, and inversion. However, ankle 3D movement proprioception has never been measured in weight-bearing. Accordingly, the active 3-dimensional movement extent discrimination apparatus (AMEDA-3D) was developed and its reliability and validity were investigated. A total of 58 subjects volunteered for this trial, with 12 subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and 12 healthy controls in the test–retest reliability study. There were 17 subjects with CAI and 17 healthy controls in the validity study. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Minimum Detectable Change at the 90% confidence interval (MDC<sub>90</sub>) were computed. AMEDA-3D scores were analysed by independent samples <i>t</i>-tests, and Youden's index was used to calculate the optimal AMEDA-3D cut-off for discriminating individuals with CAI. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between AMEDA-3D scores and Y Balance Test (YBT), Time In Balance Test (TIB), and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) scores. The main results were as follows: (1) The ICC<sub>(3,1)</sub> value of AMEDA-3D scores was 0.817 (95% CI = 0.452–0.945) in CAI subjects. (2) The AMEDA-3D proprioceptive area under the curve score used to discriminate CAI subjects from healthy controls was 0.778, with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 82%. (3) AMEDA-3D proprioceptive scores were moderately correlated with CAIT scores (<i>r</i> = 0.58 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), YBT (<i>r</i> = 0.47 and <i>p</i> = 0.005), and TIB (<i>r</i> = 0.68 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Our findings suggest that the AMEDA-3D tool shows good reliability and validity for clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits associated with CAI. Improved ankle 3D motor proprioception may positively impact subjects' balance control, self-rated symptoms, and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a 3D active movement extent discrimination apparatus for testing proprioception at the ankle joint with inversion movements made in plantarflexion\",\"authors\":\"Yilin Zhao,&nbsp;Tongzhou Zhang,&nbsp;Shuhui Wang,&nbsp;Roger Adams,&nbsp;Gordon Waddington,&nbsp;Jia Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Proprioception plays an important role in joint stability, and ankle sprains usually happen involving plantarflexion, internal rotation, and inversion. However, ankle 3D movement proprioception has never been measured in weight-bearing. Accordingly, the active 3-dimensional movement extent discrimination apparatus (AMEDA-3D) was developed and its reliability and validity were investigated. A total of 58 subjects volunteered for this trial, with 12 subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and 12 healthy controls in the test–retest reliability study. There were 17 subjects with CAI and 17 healthy controls in the validity study. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Minimum Detectable Change at the 90% confidence interval (MDC<sub>90</sub>) were computed. AMEDA-3D scores were analysed by independent samples <i>t</i>-tests, and Youden's index was used to calculate the optimal AMEDA-3D cut-off for discriminating individuals with CAI. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between AMEDA-3D scores and Y Balance Test (YBT), Time In Balance Test (TIB), and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) scores. The main results were as follows: (1) The ICC<sub>(3,1)</sub> value of AMEDA-3D scores was 0.817 (95% CI = 0.452–0.945) in CAI subjects. (2) The AMEDA-3D proprioceptive area under the curve score used to discriminate CAI subjects from healthy controls was 0.778, with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 82%. (3) AMEDA-3D proprioceptive scores were moderately correlated with CAIT scores (<i>r</i> = 0.58 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), YBT (<i>r</i> = 0.47 and <i>p</i> = 0.005), and TIB (<i>r</i> = 0.68 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Our findings suggest that the AMEDA-3D tool shows good reliability and validity for clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits associated with CAI. Improved ankle 3D motor proprioception may positively impact subjects' balance control, self-rated symptoms, and function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本体感觉对关节稳定性起着重要作用,踝关节扭伤通常涉及跖屈、内旋和内翻。然而,踝关节三维运动本体感觉从未在负重状态下进行过测量。因此,研究人员开发了主动三维运动幅度分辨仪器(AMEDA-3D),并对其可靠性和有效性进行了研究。共有 58 名受试者自愿参加了此次试验,其中 12 名受试者患有慢性踝关节不稳(CAI),12 名健康对照组受试者参加了测试-再测可靠性研究。在有效性研究中,有 17 名 CAI 受试者和 17 名健康对照组受试者。计算了类内相关系数(ICC)和 90% 置信区间的最小可检测变化(MDC90)。通过独立样本 t 检验分析了 AMEDA-3D 分数,并使用尤登指数计算了区分 CAI 患者的最佳 AMEDA-3D 临界值。皮尔逊相关分析用于探讨 AMEDA-3D 评分与 Y 平衡测试 (YBT)、平衡时间测试 (TIB) 和坎伯兰踝关节不稳定性工具 (CAIT) 评分之间的关系。主要结果如下(1) CAI 受试者 AMEDA-3D 评分的 ICC(3,1) 值为 0.817(95% CI = 0.452-0.945)。(2)用于区分 CAI 受试者和健康对照组的 AMEDA-3D 本体感觉曲线下面积评分为 0.778,灵敏度为 94%,特异度为 82%。(3) AMEDA-3D 本体感觉评分与 CAIT 评分呈中度相关(r = 0.58,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of a 3D active movement extent discrimination apparatus for testing proprioception at the ankle joint with inversion movements made in plantarflexion

Development of a 3D active movement extent discrimination apparatus for testing proprioception at the ankle joint with inversion movements made in plantarflexion

Proprioception plays an important role in joint stability, and ankle sprains usually happen involving plantarflexion, internal rotation, and inversion. However, ankle 3D movement proprioception has never been measured in weight-bearing. Accordingly, the active 3-dimensional movement extent discrimination apparatus (AMEDA-3D) was developed and its reliability and validity were investigated. A total of 58 subjects volunteered for this trial, with 12 subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and 12 healthy controls in the test–retest reliability study. There were 17 subjects with CAI and 17 healthy controls in the validity study. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Minimum Detectable Change at the 90% confidence interval (MDC90) were computed. AMEDA-3D scores were analysed by independent samples t-tests, and Youden's index was used to calculate the optimal AMEDA-3D cut-off for discriminating individuals with CAI. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between AMEDA-3D scores and Y Balance Test (YBT), Time In Balance Test (TIB), and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) scores. The main results were as follows: (1) The ICC(3,1) value of AMEDA-3D scores was 0.817 (95% CI = 0.452–0.945) in CAI subjects. (2) The AMEDA-3D proprioceptive area under the curve score used to discriminate CAI subjects from healthy controls was 0.778, with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 82%. (3) AMEDA-3D proprioceptive scores were moderately correlated with CAIT scores (r = 0.58 and p < 0.001), YBT (r = 0.47 and p = 0.005), and TIB (r = 0.68 and p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that the AMEDA-3D tool shows good reliability and validity for clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits associated with CAI. Improved ankle 3D motor proprioception may positively impact subjects' balance control, self-rated symptoms, and function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信