Kevin Ngo, Lacy S Brame, Aniruddha C Parikh, Mark M Mims
{"title":"评估社交媒体中有关面瘫和复苏的内容质量。","authors":"Kevin Ngo, Lacy S Brame, Aniruddha C Parikh, Mark M Mims","doi":"10.1177/01455613241307886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Patients frequently use social media to direct their health care. However, the quality of social media posts regarding facial paralysis and reanimation is unclear. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the quality of facial reanimation posts on social media. <b>Methods:</b> Ten key search terms were used to search YouTube and Facebook. The top 10 posts for each search term were graded using a variety of parameters including the Global Quality Score (GQS), Modified DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association Criteria, and a novel Social Media Quality Score (SMQS) which was created by the authors. <b>Results:</b> There was a significant difference in SMQS (<i>P</i> = .035) and GQS (<i>P</i> = .01) between YouTube and Facebook Videos. For YouTube videos, there was a significant difference in SMQS scores (<i>P</i> = .003) between various search terms. For Facebook videos, there was a significant difference in both SMQS (<i>P</i> < .0001) and Modified DISCERN (<i>P</i> = .036) scores. The majority of videos evaluated were of moderate or low quality. <b>Conclusion:</b> Higher quality posts regarding facial reanimation are needed on social media. As health care providers, we must provide patients with appropriate resources to find high-quality posts, and when posting content, we must carefully curate the \"key words\" so that patients can easily find high-quality content.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613241307886"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Quality of Social Media Content Regarding Facial Paralysis and Reanimation.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Ngo, Lacy S Brame, Aniruddha C Parikh, Mark M Mims\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613241307886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Patients frequently use social media to direct their health care. However, the quality of social media posts regarding facial paralysis and reanimation is unclear. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the quality of facial reanimation posts on social media. <b>Methods:</b> Ten key search terms were used to search YouTube and Facebook. The top 10 posts for each search term were graded using a variety of parameters including the Global Quality Score (GQS), Modified DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association Criteria, and a novel Social Media Quality Score (SMQS) which was created by the authors. <b>Results:</b> There was a significant difference in SMQS (<i>P</i> = .035) and GQS (<i>P</i> = .01) between YouTube and Facebook Videos. For YouTube videos, there was a significant difference in SMQS scores (<i>P</i> = .003) between various search terms. For Facebook videos, there was a significant difference in both SMQS (<i>P</i> < .0001) and Modified DISCERN (<i>P</i> = .036) scores. The majority of videos evaluated were of moderate or low quality. <b>Conclusion:</b> Higher quality posts regarding facial reanimation are needed on social media. As health care providers, we must provide patients with appropriate resources to find high-quality posts, and when posting content, we must carefully curate the \\\"key words\\\" so that patients can easily find high-quality content.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1455613241307886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241307886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241307886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the Quality of Social Media Content Regarding Facial Paralysis and Reanimation.
Introduction: Patients frequently use social media to direct their health care. However, the quality of social media posts regarding facial paralysis and reanimation is unclear. Objective: To assess the quality of facial reanimation posts on social media. Methods: Ten key search terms were used to search YouTube and Facebook. The top 10 posts for each search term were graded using a variety of parameters including the Global Quality Score (GQS), Modified DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association Criteria, and a novel Social Media Quality Score (SMQS) which was created by the authors. Results: There was a significant difference in SMQS (P = .035) and GQS (P = .01) between YouTube and Facebook Videos. For YouTube videos, there was a significant difference in SMQS scores (P = .003) between various search terms. For Facebook videos, there was a significant difference in both SMQS (P < .0001) and Modified DISCERN (P = .036) scores. The majority of videos evaluated were of moderate or low quality. Conclusion: Higher quality posts regarding facial reanimation are needed on social media. As health care providers, we must provide patients with appropriate resources to find high-quality posts, and when posting content, we must carefully curate the "key words" so that patients can easily find high-quality content.