厘清自闭症的知觉基础:来自人脸后效实验的证据。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1002/aur.3283
Julius Hennig, Arne Doose, Clara Marie Breier, Alexander Soutschek, Nicole Beyer, Stefan Schweinberger, Ingeborg Kamp-Becker, Luise Poustka, Katja Albertowski, Veit Roessner, Stefan Ehrlich
{"title":"厘清自闭症的知觉基础:来自人脸后效实验的证据。","authors":"Julius Hennig,&nbsp;Arne Doose,&nbsp;Clara Marie Breier,&nbsp;Alexander Soutschek,&nbsp;Nicole Beyer,&nbsp;Stefan Schweinberger,&nbsp;Ingeborg Kamp-Becker,&nbsp;Luise Poustka,&nbsp;Katja Albertowski,&nbsp;Veit Roessner,&nbsp;Stefan Ehrlich","doi":"10.1002/aur.3283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Existing literature has documented diminished norm-based adaptation (aftereffects) across several perceptual domains in autism. However, the exact underlying mechanisms, such as sensory dominance possibly caused by imprecise priors and/or increased sensory precision, remain elusive. The “Bayesian brain” framework offers refined methods to investigate these mechanisms. This study utilized both model-free (frequentist statistics) and model-based (hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling) analytical approaches to compare gender face aftereffects in male adolescents with autism (<i>n</i> = 29) to neurotypical controls (<i>n</i> = 39) using a behavioral choice experiment. Contrary to our initial hypotheses, our analyses did not find support for imprecise priors or increased sensory precision within the autistic group. Instead, we observed generally decreased drift rates towards male but not female stimuli in the autistic group. Thus, our findings suggest a lack of own-gender bias in face processing among the autistic participants. These findings align with more recent behavioral and neurophysiological research observing intact priors in individuals with autism, suggesting that other mechanisms may better explain the perceptual challenges in autism. Our study contributes to the ongoing discourse on perceptual processing in autism, emphasizing the necessity for more nuanced analytical approaches in order to unravel the complexity of this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"349-361"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.3283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the perceptual underpinnings of autism: Evidence from a face aftereffects experiment\",\"authors\":\"Julius Hennig,&nbsp;Arne Doose,&nbsp;Clara Marie Breier,&nbsp;Alexander Soutschek,&nbsp;Nicole Beyer,&nbsp;Stefan Schweinberger,&nbsp;Ingeborg Kamp-Becker,&nbsp;Luise Poustka,&nbsp;Katja Albertowski,&nbsp;Veit Roessner,&nbsp;Stefan Ehrlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aur.3283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Existing literature has documented diminished norm-based adaptation (aftereffects) across several perceptual domains in autism. However, the exact underlying mechanisms, such as sensory dominance possibly caused by imprecise priors and/or increased sensory precision, remain elusive. The “Bayesian brain” framework offers refined methods to investigate these mechanisms. This study utilized both model-free (frequentist statistics) and model-based (hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling) analytical approaches to compare gender face aftereffects in male adolescents with autism (<i>n</i> = 29) to neurotypical controls (<i>n</i> = 39) using a behavioral choice experiment. Contrary to our initial hypotheses, our analyses did not find support for imprecise priors or increased sensory precision within the autistic group. Instead, we observed generally decreased drift rates towards male but not female stimuli in the autistic group. Thus, our findings suggest a lack of own-gender bias in face processing among the autistic participants. These findings align with more recent behavioral and neurophysiological research observing intact priors in individuals with autism, suggesting that other mechanisms may better explain the perceptual challenges in autism. Our study contributes to the ongoing discourse on perceptual processing in autism, emphasizing the necessity for more nuanced analytical approaches in order to unravel the complexity of this condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism Research\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"349-361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.3283\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.3283\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.3283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有文献记载,自闭症患者在多个感知领域的规范适应(后遗效应)都有所减弱。然而,其确切的内在机制,如可能由不精确的先验和/或增加的感觉精确度引起的感觉优势,仍然难以捉摸。贝叶斯大脑 "框架为研究这些机制提供了完善的方法。本研究利用无模型(频数统计)和基于模型(分层漂移扩散建模)的分析方法,通过行为选择实验比较了患有自闭症的男性青少年(n = 29)和神经正常对照组(n = 39)的性别面孔后效应。与我们最初的假设相反,我们的分析并未发现自闭症群体中存在不精确的先验或感官精确度提高的情况。相反,我们观察到自闭症群体对男性刺激的漂移率普遍下降,而对女性刺激的漂移率却没有下降。因此,我们的研究结果表明,自闭症参与者在人脸处理过程中缺乏自身性别偏差。这些发现与最近观察到的自闭症患者完整先验的行为和神经生理学研究结果一致,表明其他机制可能更能解释自闭症患者的知觉挑战。我们的研究为目前有关自闭症知觉处理的讨论做出了贡献,强调了采用更细致的分析方法来揭示这种疾病的复杂性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Disentangling the perceptual underpinnings of autism: Evidence from a face aftereffects experiment

Disentangling the perceptual underpinnings of autism: Evidence from a face aftereffects experiment

Existing literature has documented diminished norm-based adaptation (aftereffects) across several perceptual domains in autism. However, the exact underlying mechanisms, such as sensory dominance possibly caused by imprecise priors and/or increased sensory precision, remain elusive. The “Bayesian brain” framework offers refined methods to investigate these mechanisms. This study utilized both model-free (frequentist statistics) and model-based (hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling) analytical approaches to compare gender face aftereffects in male adolescents with autism (n = 29) to neurotypical controls (n = 39) using a behavioral choice experiment. Contrary to our initial hypotheses, our analyses did not find support for imprecise priors or increased sensory precision within the autistic group. Instead, we observed generally decreased drift rates towards male but not female stimuli in the autistic group. Thus, our findings suggest a lack of own-gender bias in face processing among the autistic participants. These findings align with more recent behavioral and neurophysiological research observing intact priors in individuals with autism, suggesting that other mechanisms may better explain the perceptual challenges in autism. Our study contributes to the ongoing discourse on perceptual processing in autism, emphasizing the necessity for more nuanced analytical approaches in order to unravel the complexity of this condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信