Marni B Jacobs, Alex E Clark, Nicole H Goldhaber, Holly D Valentine, Andrea Rivera, Toan Ngo, Tom Barber, Jacqueline Holmes, Brittany Manfredi, Aaron F Garretson, William Bray, Rob Knight, Christopher A Longhurst, Aaron F Carlin, Peter De Hoff, Louise C Laurent
{"title":"高通量变异特异性 SARS-CoV-2 抗梭状病毒 IgG 和 ACE2 中和检测的抗体水平与大量人群中 COVID 感染风险相关。","authors":"Marni B Jacobs, Alex E Clark, Nicole H Goldhaber, Holly D Valentine, Andrea Rivera, Toan Ngo, Tom Barber, Jacqueline Holmes, Brittany Manfredi, Aaron F Garretson, William Bray, Rob Knight, Christopher A Longhurst, Aaron F Carlin, Peter De Hoff, Louise C Laurent","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels have been proposed as a correlate of protection from infection. Yet, large-scale prospective studies of cost-effective scalable antibody measures as predictors of infection under real-world conditions are limited. We examined whether antibody levels measured by high-throughput variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) neutralization assays correlate with cell-based neutralizing antibody measurements and whether they can serve as a reasonable correlate of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a large institutional cohort study between January 2022 and March 2023. Participants (N = 2513) provided dried blood spot (DBS) samples for assessment of anti-spike IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels through high-throughput assays. Comparison with authentic cell-based SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assays was conducted with serum samples (n = 105). Associations between antibody levels and risk of infection were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation between serum and DBS sampling and between cell-based neutralizing and high-throughput antibody binding assays was high for anti-spike IgG and ACE2 neutralization, though the degree of correlation varied by variant. Longitudinal evaluation suggested that DBS-based IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels were anticorrelated with infection risk, with higher sensitivity noted for ACE2 inhibition and variant-matched measures. IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels decreased over time, with more durable responses observed in participants whose most recent priming event was infection vs vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels may be a useful correlate of protection for infection, which has important implications for vaccination recommendations and evaluating infection risk. High-throughput assays measured via DBS may have utility in timing of boosters at the population or individual level.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"921-930"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibody Levels From High-Throughput Variant-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike Immunoglobulin G and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Neutralization Assays Correlate With COVID-19 Infection Risk in a Large Population.\",\"authors\":\"Marni B Jacobs, Alex E Clark, Nicole H Goldhaber, Holly D Valentine, Andrea Rivera, Toan Ngo, Tom Barber, Jacqueline Holmes, Brittany Manfredi, Aaron F Garretson, William Bray, Rob Knight, Christopher A Longhurst, Aaron F Carlin, Peter De Hoff, Louise C Laurent\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiae622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels have been proposed as a correlate of protection from infection. Yet, large-scale prospective studies of cost-effective scalable antibody measures as predictors of infection under real-world conditions are limited. We examined whether antibody levels measured by high-throughput variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) neutralization assays correlate with cell-based neutralizing antibody measurements and whether they can serve as a reasonable correlate of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a large institutional cohort study between January 2022 and March 2023. Participants (N = 2513) provided dried blood spot (DBS) samples for assessment of anti-spike IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels through high-throughput assays. Comparison with authentic cell-based SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assays was conducted with serum samples (n = 105). Associations between antibody levels and risk of infection were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation between serum and DBS sampling and between cell-based neutralizing and high-throughput antibody binding assays was high for anti-spike IgG and ACE2 neutralization, though the degree of correlation varied by variant. Longitudinal evaluation suggested that DBS-based IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels were anticorrelated with infection risk, with higher sensitivity noted for ACE2 inhibition and variant-matched measures. IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels decreased over time, with more durable responses observed in participants whose most recent priming event was infection vs vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels may be a useful correlate of protection for infection, which has important implications for vaccination recommendations and evaluating infection risk. High-throughput assays measured via DBS may have utility in timing of boosters at the population or individual level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"921-930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998568/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae622\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antibody Levels From High-Throughput Variant-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike Immunoglobulin G and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Neutralization Assays Correlate With COVID-19 Infection Risk in a Large Population.
Background: SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels have been proposed as a correlate of protection from infection. Yet, large-scale prospective studies of cost-effective scalable antibody measures as predictors of infection under real-world conditions are limited. We examined whether antibody levels measured by high-throughput variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) neutralization assays correlate with cell-based neutralizing antibody measurements and whether they can serve as a reasonable correlate of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Methods: We conducted a large institutional cohort study between January 2022 and March 2023. Participants (N = 2513) provided dried blood spot (DBS) samples for assessment of anti-spike IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels through high-throughput assays. Comparison with authentic cell-based SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assays was conducted with serum samples (n = 105). Associations between antibody levels and risk of infection were evaluated.
Results: Correlation between serum and DBS sampling and between cell-based neutralizing and high-throughput antibody binding assays was high for anti-spike IgG and ACE2 neutralization, though the degree of correlation varied by variant. Longitudinal evaluation suggested that DBS-based IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels were anticorrelated with infection risk, with higher sensitivity noted for ACE2 inhibition and variant-matched measures. IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels decreased over time, with more durable responses observed in participants whose most recent priming event was infection vs vaccination.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels may be a useful correlate of protection for infection, which has important implications for vaccination recommendations and evaluating infection risk. High-throughput assays measured via DBS may have utility in timing of boosters at the population or individual level.
期刊介绍:
Published continuously since 1904, The Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) is the premier global journal for original research on infectious diseases. The editors welcome Major Articles and Brief Reports describing research results on microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and related disciplines, on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases; on the microbes that cause them; and on disorders of host immune responses. JID is an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.