高通量变异特异性 SARS-CoV-2 抗梭状病毒 IgG 和 ACE2 中和检测的抗体水平与大量人群中 COVID 感染风险相关。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Marni B Jacobs, Alex E Clark, Nicole H Goldhaber, Holly D Valentine, Andrea Rivera, Toan Ngo, Tom Barber, Jacqueline Holmes, Brittany Manfredi, Aaron F Garretson, William Bray, Rob Knight, Christopher A Longhurst, Aaron F Carlin, Peter De Hoff, Louise C Laurent
{"title":"高通量变异特异性 SARS-CoV-2 抗梭状病毒 IgG 和 ACE2 中和检测的抗体水平与大量人群中 COVID 感染风险相关。","authors":"Marni B Jacobs, Alex E Clark, Nicole H Goldhaber, Holly D Valentine, Andrea Rivera, Toan Ngo, Tom Barber, Jacqueline Holmes, Brittany Manfredi, Aaron F Garretson, William Bray, Rob Knight, Christopher A Longhurst, Aaron F Carlin, Peter De Hoff, Louise C Laurent","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels have been proposed as a correlate of protection from infection. Yet, large-scale prospective studies of cost-effective scalable antibody measures as predictors of infection under real-world conditions are limited. We examined whether antibody levels measured by high-throughput variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) neutralization assays correlate with cell-based neutralizing antibody measurements and whether they can serve as a reasonable correlate of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a large institutional cohort study between January 2022 and March 2023. Participants (N = 2513) provided dried blood spot (DBS) samples for assessment of anti-spike IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels through high-throughput assays. Comparison with authentic cell-based SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assays was conducted with serum samples (n = 105). Associations between antibody levels and risk of infection were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation between serum and DBS sampling and between cell-based neutralizing and high-throughput antibody binding assays was high for anti-spike IgG and ACE2 neutralization, though the degree of correlation varied by variant. Longitudinal evaluation suggested that DBS-based IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels were anticorrelated with infection risk, with higher sensitivity noted for ACE2 inhibition and variant-matched measures. IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels decreased over time, with more durable responses observed in participants whose most recent priming event was infection vs vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels may be a useful correlate of protection for infection, which has important implications for vaccination recommendations and evaluating infection risk. High-throughput assays measured via DBS may have utility in timing of boosters at the population or individual level.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"921-930"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibody Levels From High-Throughput Variant-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike Immunoglobulin G and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Neutralization Assays Correlate With COVID-19 Infection Risk in a Large Population.\",\"authors\":\"Marni B Jacobs, Alex E Clark, Nicole H Goldhaber, Holly D Valentine, Andrea Rivera, Toan Ngo, Tom Barber, Jacqueline Holmes, Brittany Manfredi, Aaron F Garretson, William Bray, Rob Knight, Christopher A Longhurst, Aaron F Carlin, Peter De Hoff, Louise C Laurent\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiae622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels have been proposed as a correlate of protection from infection. Yet, large-scale prospective studies of cost-effective scalable antibody measures as predictors of infection under real-world conditions are limited. We examined whether antibody levels measured by high-throughput variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) neutralization assays correlate with cell-based neutralizing antibody measurements and whether they can serve as a reasonable correlate of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a large institutional cohort study between January 2022 and March 2023. Participants (N = 2513) provided dried blood spot (DBS) samples for assessment of anti-spike IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels through high-throughput assays. Comparison with authentic cell-based SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assays was conducted with serum samples (n = 105). Associations between antibody levels and risk of infection were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation between serum and DBS sampling and between cell-based neutralizing and high-throughput antibody binding assays was high for anti-spike IgG and ACE2 neutralization, though the degree of correlation varied by variant. Longitudinal evaluation suggested that DBS-based IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels were anticorrelated with infection risk, with higher sensitivity noted for ACE2 inhibition and variant-matched measures. IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels decreased over time, with more durable responses observed in participants whose most recent priming event was infection vs vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels may be a useful correlate of protection for infection, which has important implications for vaccination recommendations and evaluating infection risk. High-throughput assays measured via DBS may have utility in timing of boosters at the population or individual level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"921-930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998568/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae622\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:SARS-CoV-2抗体水平被认为是保护(CoP)免受感染的相关因素。然而,在现实世界条件下,将具有成本效益的可扩展抗体措施作为感染预测指标的大规模前瞻性研究是有限的。我们研究了使用高通量变异特异性SARS-CoV-2抗刺突免疫球蛋白G (IgG)和ace2中和试验测量的抗体水平是否与基于细胞的中和抗体(NAb)测量相关,以及它们是否可以作为SARS-CoV-2感染的合理CoP。方法:我们在2022年1月至2023年3月期间进行了一项大型机构队列研究。参与者(n= 2513)提供干血斑(DBS)样本,使用高通量测定法评估抗刺突IgG和ACE2抑制水平。使用血清样本(n=105)与真实的基于细胞的SARS-CoV-2 NAb检测方法进行比较。评估抗体水平与感染风险之间的关系。研究结果:血清和DBS取样、基于细胞的中和和高通量抗体结合测定之间的相关性对于抗刺突IgG和ACE2的中和都是很高的,尽管相关程度因变体而异。纵向评估显示,基于dbs的IgG和ACE2抑制水平与感染风险呈负相关,ACE2抑制和变异匹配措施的敏感性更高。IgG和ACE2抑制水平随着时间的推移而下降,在最近的启动事件是感染与接种疫苗的参与者中观察到更持久的反应。研究结果提示,变异特异性SARS-CoV-2抗体水平可能是一种有用的感染CoP,这对疫苗接种建议和感染风险评估具有重要意义。通过DBS测量的高通量测定可能在人群或个体水平上对助推器的时间有实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibody Levels From High-Throughput Variant-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike Immunoglobulin G and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Neutralization Assays Correlate With COVID-19 Infection Risk in a Large Population.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels have been proposed as a correlate of protection from infection. Yet, large-scale prospective studies of cost-effective scalable antibody measures as predictors of infection under real-world conditions are limited. We examined whether antibody levels measured by high-throughput variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) neutralization assays correlate with cell-based neutralizing antibody measurements and whether they can serve as a reasonable correlate of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods: We conducted a large institutional cohort study between January 2022 and March 2023. Participants (N = 2513) provided dried blood spot (DBS) samples for assessment of anti-spike IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels through high-throughput assays. Comparison with authentic cell-based SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assays was conducted with serum samples (n = 105). Associations between antibody levels and risk of infection were evaluated.

Results: Correlation between serum and DBS sampling and between cell-based neutralizing and high-throughput antibody binding assays was high for anti-spike IgG and ACE2 neutralization, though the degree of correlation varied by variant. Longitudinal evaluation suggested that DBS-based IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels were anticorrelated with infection risk, with higher sensitivity noted for ACE2 inhibition and variant-matched measures. IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels decreased over time, with more durable responses observed in participants whose most recent priming event was infection vs vaccination.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels may be a useful correlate of protection for infection, which has important implications for vaccination recommendations and evaluating infection risk. High-throughput assays measured via DBS may have utility in timing of boosters at the population or individual level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Journal of Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
449
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published continuously since 1904, The Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) is the premier global journal for original research on infectious diseases. The editors welcome Major Articles and Brief Reports describing research results on microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and related disciplines, on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases; on the microbes that cause them; and on disorders of host immune responses. JID is an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信